Why no interest in Perryman?
Chuggas best mate
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Why no interest in Perryman?
Warner I think maybe Papley.Wondering when Houston nominates Carlton
Also Wondering which player nominates to be traded if they win a flag
In the case of Kennedy, we had trouble fitting him in the midfield and he often drew the short straw playing out of his preferred position. Carroll is even further back in the midfield pecking order and having an impact in the senior team.Just trying to keep things simple, if we lose Kennedy, Owies amd Carrol, unless the draftees who come in are better, then I think we go backwards.
Even if we get full years from the players you mention, I don’t think it changes anything.
A full tllt at the draft is fine as long as you or we replace the players we cut in the short term
Massive salary apparently.Why no interest in Perryman?
$850k over 6 years apparently what he’s been offeredMassive salary apparently.
The more I read, see and hear about the Owies situation, the more it makes sense.
As for Stringer, no thanks. Has the ability to turn a game, win it off his own boot and is great to watch when he's on. Unfortunately he isn't anywhere near consistent enough and his worst is horrible.
Finally papley is coming home lolWarner I think maybe Papley.
Do you think players would ever have an agreement with a club, if we win a premiership let me go home early.
What’s he done to get the hate?On stringer.
Last 4 years
19 games - 41 goals
15 games - 25 goals
17 games - 21 goals
23 games - 45 goals
Career average of 2.66 tackles a game.
Take away the knob factor, bloke is durable, kicks goals, has a X factor that we are in need of.
I believe he has at least 2 years left of this type of output.
Mates with saad from what I’ve read. Read also that Stringer in person is actually a lovely guy.
If we had a crystal ball and we could look into the future and he was part of us getting the next flag would the ‘Carlton respects, or no dickheads policy’ crew still say no.
Worth a punt.
Bloke made mistakes, comes across like a dick ‘hello ginni, Zorko, papley, ect’ but not unworthy of a second chance.
May have missed something but what has he done wrong over the last 5+ years?
We are a strong club now with strong leadership, hard nut coach, trust them to set the standards.
And you think the players at our club are all angels?Big difference between dickhead & scum bag.
Stringer firmly in the scum bag camp & given that the afl took it upon themselves to call out his & Hind for who they associate with it, shows he hasn’t got any smarter.
Special level of piece of shit to cheat on the mother of your two young kids (who you’ve been in 10yr relationship with) with a 17yr old school girl.
That’s only the tip of the iceberg - we don’t need that shit at the club.
* are shit, if there was any chance of a positive with him they would have signed him for 2 already
$850k over 6 years apparently what he’s been offered
Yep people keep referring to individual stats (goals specifically) when referring to players like Stringer but the reality is his traits like you have mentioned break down in terms of team structures, disciplines and most importantly rules/system !!Stringer would still have a couple of decent on field moments, but I find him even more lazy, selfish and conditional
Would be a no from my perspective
Dueling banjos. Great scene, great movie.
Expensive, not very fast (so doesn't address our ball movement issues).Why no interest in Perryman?
Career average of 2.66 tackles a game.
Take away the knob factor, bloke is durable, kicks goals, has a X factor that we are in need of.
I believe he has at least 2 years left of this type of output.
Mates with saad from what I’ve read. Read also that Stringer in person is actually a lovely guy.
Stringer would still have a couple of decent on field moments, but I find him even more lazy, selfish and conditional
Would be a no from my perspective
Don’t know if Stringer is capable of the sorts of performances that he once was, but if he *could play that sort of footy consistently I’d look at him on the condition of:
If he came with the drive and determination to be a team-oriented 3rd tall, he’d kick 40 goals and probably go a long way to helping us to a flag. But that’s an almighty big if.
- He’s calmed down off-field
- He passes a medical with flying colours.
- He’s fit for day 1 of pre-season
- He’s on an extremely low base-wage contract with performance bonuses built in
Good post, agree on those points. Just don't get the interest in him. We will have a fit, strong and determined JSOSYeah most of those tackles are from 2-3 steps away as his man beats him to the ball and if it's not in that zone he doesn't chase at all, there's a reason no clubs are chasing him.
Also the AFL gave him and Essendon and official warning about his mates coming in the rooms after games. They are not people we want around the club.
ThisCan we please stop talking about Stringer coming anywhere near our club. Please I beg you all…..
Can we please stop talking about Stringer coming anywhere near our club. Please I beg you all…..