pressurepoint
Team Captain
- Dec 24, 2012
- 315
- 416
- AFL Club
- Carlton
If we trade up to 3, I worry about the pressure we place on the kid we pick
He will forever be compared to who gets picked at 12, 14, and our 2025 F1 and F2
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If we trade up to 3, I worry about the pressure we place on the kid we pick
Yep, in your scenario, we'd have 0 x F1, 2 x F2s, 0 x F3. So if trade out one of the F2s, need to get (at least) an F3 back. Agree, it's doable. Maybe GC's 29.Currently hold Brisbanes F2. Would think we would find a way
You've over thought my point Soapy.Good clubs do this well.
Lions brought in Payne for example who struggled previously but played a role in GF side. Ah Chee was struggling at GCS. Every flag side has these players. You need 30 or more players contributing to win a flag.
As much as we all get excited by early picks and names like Houston it’s our ability to nail a couple of later players that can take us further.
A List Managers ability to maximise late picks, rookies or improve DFAs can make a massive difference to a side
Is that you Curley?eric just told us what our options are. They are all fantastic. There are 3 days left. Peripheral dreaming can cease lol.
Austin has put us in a fantastic position.
Ryan I understand but DGB is 22. IMO worth the discussion at least to see if club can think he can reach his early potentialYou've over thought my point Soapy.
There's players and then there's players.
I'm all for recycled players.
I was objecting to people putting forward names like Liam Ryan and even Granger Barrass.
Older players with injury histories and the old we'll try to retrain the square peg to fill our round hole.
Ludicrous when we are finally balancing our list and making it more durable. Spots are a premium. Right player....of course!
Cant see how WC now get Baker. They wont use 3 of course. They wont get a 1st for Barrass now. They only have next years 1st which could be in the top 5 again.
And i think Richmond want pics this year.
Let’s see their tune once Freo swoopes on Baker now.
So 9? I'll say 8 Dunkley is not a star. Cerra 2023 > Dunkley
Cripps, Walsh, Charlie, harry, TDK, weits, Draper, Saad
Comfortable with that for sure! (I think Saad is a better half back than zorko)
But to their credit. They also have kiddy Coleman who is a ****ing gun too.
They've a great list. I think Draper puts our midfield ahead of theirs
I think our spine is ahead.
Our flankers are well behind.
I don't see adding Houston as putting us any closer to them. Draper? **** yes.
We shouldn’t offer anything more. If they want our picks then it needs to be on our terms. Plus the points index is well in their favour just if we traded 12, 14 for 3
I think Richmond would be receptive to future picks to spread the talent, and subsequent contract extensions, over a broader span of time. All clubs plan years in advance so, I wouldn’t write them off as a trade partner in any context.I hope we take advantage if we do this trade for pick 3. This time is different, if we are to believe they contacted us, then we need to ask for a bit more than just pick 3, because at the end of the day they need our two picks to get Baker and keep a 1st for themselves too. The threat of Fremantle to get both baker and Bolton is real as they have 3 1st rounders.
I would be also asking for at least a 2nd round pick or dare i say it the pick they get for Barrass. And throw in Carrol too.
So that will leave us with pick 3, round 2 and the later picks for points that we can possible move up or do something with.
We have a bit of the upper hand here. It’s how i would play it.
Westcoast want Bolton and they cant lose him to Fremantle. No one else can offer this hand to them but us. It wont be St Kilda. Sydneys picks are at the bottom end of the 1st round.
And i dont think Richmond want future picks.
It’s ruthless yes, but i want us to be.
We have thrown an offer out there. Walk away now and if they come back to us it’s on our terms. Let’s all not forget, 12 and 14 in a even draft is goldOh well fun while it lasted
TBH, I've thought about this a LOT over the last couple of years.I`m with you, I would like to see us hold our two 1st rounders & hit the draft. If we trade up to 3, I worry about the pressure we place on the kid we pick....IMHO Stocker is an example of a kid drowning in expectation when we drafted him.
Agree. We've done trades so far that are nominally in the other side's favour in order to get us in the position we are, with 2 good first round picks. If WC want those picks, it will be a trade in our favour. Very happy to go to the draft with those two picks otherwise.We have thrown an offer out there. Walk away now and if they come back to us it’s on our terms. Let’s all not forget, 12 and 14 in a even draft is gold
don't forget big Billy Frampton!Best sides get value out of recycled players.
Surely this is not controversial.
Oleg Markov played in a premiership last year.
Tyson Stengle the year before.
On Pixel 7a using BigFooty.com mobile app
Pick 3 is worth 2348 pts
Picks 12 and 14 worth 2840
That’s roughly a difference of pick 50.
Austin has made it clear he wants 2 picks inside 20 not sure how that deal for pick 3 would work for us.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app