Board discussion

[blue gunslinger]

Hmm please explain where I have ever been shown to have a vendetta against a Carlton player? Nope never. Have always loved the bunnies on this board - Russell, Walker, Hampson etc.

I have been critical of Ratts, but also said he deserves a fair go and said so in another thread earlier tonight discussing Malthouse.

I have also never claimed to have any personal connections with the club.

So sorry I don't think you could reasonably accuse me of any of those things.

What I won't do is simply refuse to criticise the CFC. That sort of head in the sand mentality is what enabled JE to get away with stuffing the club for a decade. It is prevalent on this board.

I am not the first poster to complain about a boy's club on this board. So you can post as many assurances as you like, at the end of the day you are a moderator not someone that can force feed us what to think. I believe there is a serious bias on this board, mainly shown by groups of posters targetting people and all jumping in to defend one of their group that says something stupid. This is reinforced by the mods not taking a firm stand against such behaviour.

As for your comments on what the mods agree will be sanctioned, why don't you discuss posters suggesting that rules of evidence be changed to ensure an AFL player (a former CFC player) receives a criminal conviction? Does such a stupid statement have a place on this board?

so you are asking MSR to give you a red for calling me a w***er?

 

[Chism]

program started today dammit.Here we go again

Start running then!!

 

[blue gunslinger]

Start running then!!

80+kms per week plus cross training and hill climbs

 

[jono25]

so you are asking MSR to give you a red for calling me a w***er?

I stand 100% by my opinion as previously expressed.

 

[jono25]

80+kms per week plus cross training and hill climbs

oh well makes my new year's resolution to run 5kms a day and swim 1km look soft. But then I would assume you are much more fit than I so gotta start somewhere.

 

[blue gunslinger]

I stand 100% by my opinion as previously expressed.

I will inform my 33 other accounts
You certainly have covered yourself in glory

 

[thylacine60]

As for your comments on what the mods agree will be sanctioned, why don't you discuss posters suggesting that rules of evidence be changed to ensure an AFL player (a former CFC player) receives a criminal conviction? Does such a stupid statement have a place on this board?

Deary me, shall we moan on and on about it? You're a year past Fev's use by date. Freshen your work, Suitboy.

 

[jono25]

I will inform my 33 other accounts
You certainly have covered yourself in glory

what are you on about now?? 33 accounts?

 

[jono25]

Deary me, shall we moan on and on about it? You're a year past Fev's use by date. Freshen your work, Suitboy.

Your attitude is out of touch with western society. Rather than deflecting the comment by poor attempts at humour directed at myself, how about justifying the statement?

You go on about having a social conscience, but seem to think it is ok to amend the legal system to demonise one individual.

 

[bluepride]

Waterworld wasnt too bad of a movie if you ask me.

 

[thylacine60]

Your attitude is out of touch with western society. Rather than deflecting the comment by poor attempts at humour directed at myself, how about justifying the statement?

You go on about having a social conscience, but seem to think it is ok to amend the legal system to demonise one individual.

Crikey, even your dog has had enough of you. But he's wrong, Waterworld sucked.

 

[blue gunslinger]

hmm and what do you have in common with guns? Pretty sad when you use multiple accounts to attack a poster.

what are you on about now?? 33 accounts?

indeed

 

[bluepride]

Crikey, even your dog has had enough of you. But he's wrong, Waterworld sucked.

Dont call me a dog Thy.

Now im serious.

 

[Chism]

Crikey, even your dog has had enough of you. But he's wrong, Waterworld sucked.

Channel 9 has "Any which way you can" on the sequel to every which way but loose with Clint Eastwood and the orangutan Claude!! It's a pisser!

 

[thylacine60]

Dont call me a dog Thy.

Now im serious.

If only I could believe you.

 

[blue gunslinger]

Dont call me a dog Thy.

Now im serious.

bluepride-do you know of celtic pride and how he once stirred the pot? Left of centre sometimes but entertaining

 

[bluepride]

Channel 9 has "Any which way you can" on the sequel to every which way but loose with Clint Eastwood and the orangutan Claude!! It's a pisser!

Dad loves that movie, I just dont seem to get it .

 

[40yearBLUE]

harshly.

but then somebody arguing to change the rules of evidence to convict an individual would be banned from posting because of suggesting something utterly inconsistent with social norms.

You really do have some issues dont you. Go back and re-read the brief councelor.

Never once did I say that the rules of evidence as they pertain to law need to be changed. I didnt speak to him being charged I spoke to him being sacked as an AFL player. You really need to stick the facts in evidence in the thread and I deliberately ignored your calls to have me explain something I did not in fact say.

I am sorry that I have to type monosyllabic words and definitions for you to understand and that my tongue in cheek throw away lines are taken so literally by you, but my point was that the AFL have had ample "evidence" of Fev bringing the game into disrepute and have failed to act, perhaps citing the excuse of lack of evidence of a crime as their excuse, and perhaps hiding the real reasons.

That being that they either are too scared to act or dont want to act because they are to invested in Fev and are simply mouthing the platitudes of action and then taking none. All implicit in all of my postings but apparently beyond your brilliant legal thinking. MEH, and you wonder why I sometimes question the veracity of certain posters claims of themselves.

Even the scantest research would have told you councelor, that I believe the AFL to be immorally beholden to big liquor and brewing, and that we as a society have serious issues with alcohol abuse. IMO the AFL is out of step with the community values on this and their constant turning a blind eye sends a totally inappropriate message to the vulnerable and impressionable in society whilst the very deep and troubling issues that alcohol abuse and the havoc it wreaks on society go unanswered by a body that has a moral responsibility that it is abrogating on the issue perhaps because of the dollars it brings. As I said even the most cursory of research (and you laughed at me because I used wiki, better than no research at all huh?) in these forums would show you that.

Also the most cursory of research would show you that I have disagreed with just about everyone on these forums, I recall a heated debate I had with guns over Carrots once, so this notion of a boys club you have concocted smacks of paranoia.

For the record I also got a warning and it was deserved for I scarcely can hide the utter contempt with which I hold some posters, but I will try harder. I replied to my warning that I agreed and had noted my failings but that perhaps the thread was closed prematurely as I felt it was working itself out. Perhaps that thought, given the evidence to the contrary in this thread was erroneous.

BTW the only club I see is the one that abhors people that think they are better than others and bignote themselves and rails against them accordingly. Perhaps some humility and you might find you dont have need for the paranoia?

 

[blue gunslinger]

Dad loves that movie, I just dont seem to get it .

love the bikie gang
man u up 1-0
get fox

 

[bluepride]

If only I could believe you.

I really dont care for your humor at the moment.

Dont call me a dog.

I like to have a bit of fun, its a forum mate. I just asked not to be called a dog nothing big. Not many people like to back down these days and just say okay.

 

[blue gunslinger]

make that 1-1 go west brom

 

[thylacine60]

make that 1-1 go west brom

I hate Man U.

 

[jono25]

You really do have some issues dont you. Go back and re-read the brief councelor.

Never once did I say that the rules of evidence as they pertain to law need to be changed. I didnt speak to him being charged I spoke to him being sacked as an AFL player. You really need to stick the facts in evidence in the thread and I deliberately ignored your calls to have me explain something I did not in fact say.

I am sorry that I have to type monosyllabic words and definitions for you to understand and that my tongue in cheek throw away lines are taken so literally by you, but my point was that the AFL have had ample "evidence" of Fev bringing the game into disrepute and have failed to act, perhaps citing the excuse of lack of evidence of a crime as their excuse, and perhaps hiding the real reasons.

That being that they either are too scared to act or dont want to act because they are to invested in Fev and are simply mouthing the platitudes of action and then taking none. All implicit in all of my postings but apparently beyond your brilliant legal thinking. MEH, and you wonder why I sometimes question the veracity of certain posters claims of themselves.

Even the scantest research would have told you councelor, that I believe the AFL to be immorally beholden to big liquor and brewing, and that we as a society have serious issues with alcohol abuse. IMO the AFL is out of step with the community values on this and their constant turning a blind eye sends a totally inappropriate message to the vulnerable and impressionable in society whilst the very deep and troubling issues that alcohol abuse and the havoc it wreaks on society go unanswered by a body that has a moral responsibility that it is abrogating on the issue perhaps because of the dollars it brings. As I said even the most cursory of research (and you laughed at me because I used wiki, better than no research at all huh?) in these forums would show you that.

Also the most cursory of research would show you that I have disagreed with just about everyone on these forums, I recall a heated debate I had with guns over Carrots once, so this notion of a boys club you have concocted smacks of paranoia.

For the record I also got a warning and it was deserved for I scarcely can hide the utter contempt with which I hold some posters, but I will try harder. I replied to my warning that I agreed and had noted my failings but that perhaps the thread was closed prematurely as I felt it was working itself out. Perhaps that thought, given the evidence to the contrary in this thread was erroneous.

BTW the only club I see is the one that abhors people that think they are better than others and bignote themselves and rails against them accordingly. Perhaps some humility and you might find you dont have need for the paranoia?

Here is your exact quote "At last count Fev allegedly assaulted 2 in the last 15 months, insufficient evidence to charge him on any though, time we changed the definition of evidence"

"time we changed the definition of evidence" - speaks for itself really.

I won't respond to the rest of your comments, except to say they are baseless.

 

[Chism]

make that 1-1 go west brom

Soccer sux!!!

Monday morning 5am NFL baby!!!! Wooooot!

Nearly playoffs as well!

 

[40yearBLUE]

I hate Man U.

And I hate U Man.

Good night all.