FR0GGY
From a cartel villa in Tuscany
3 kidsWhat was your decision making process to get to this point (to have surgery)?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
3 kidsWhat was your decision making process to get to this point (to have surgery)?
Just have more kidsThis is a terrible thread to read before you’re about to get surgery down there.
NooooooooJust have more kids
Can you just summarise what was being said in the Podcast?People should take the time and listen to the Howie Games podcast and Chris Judd's take on OP
Enlightening and even Brad should have a chat to Judd
In your case, it was high reward surgery! lol3 kids
Prefer you to listen but getting jabs at the Eagles just to play. Jabs at half time.Can you just summarise what was being said in the Podcast?
Well hopefully he won't be reading this! And besides, I don't think we're saying things that he hasn't heard before from his surgeon.This is a terrible thread to read before you’re about to get surgery down there.
It’s not all about brad, it was about me!Well hopefully he won't be reading this! And besides, I don't think we're saying things that he hasn't heard before from his surgeon.
Now has bicept awarenessthey accidentally swapped his arm and leg during surgery
What are you even talking about? Brad has *never* gotten over his groin issues. They've been ongoing and deteriorating for 18 months.Where are you getting your facts about the chances of success for surgery vs no surgery?
Brad has proven multiple times he can get over his groin issues from "no surgery", so why would they jump on "surgery" over the preseason?
Has anyone thought perhaps Brad didn't want surgery unless he had to?
Me personally if there is a possibility that something can resolve itself without cutting into me id take that option.
How long he should have rested for is a subject of opinions, and it would be of a better opinion if all the facts were given to us. Brad's case is an isolated case, because he's the one that has not had one full season with us without a given injury/issue throughout his time at the Crows. There is no BS involved in Brad's case, because I keep repeating and I'll say it again - surgical decisions are not made by the club, they're made by the specialists in conjunction with Brad, weighing up all the pros and cons. You're also making a big assumption he had been rested for 22 weeks without any improvements, but I reckon he had gotten better somewhere mid-way and then another flare-up happened again.What are you even talking about? Brad has *never* gotten over his groin issues. They've been ongoing and deteriorating for 18 months.
I'll defer to those who have greater knowledge than me when it comes to medical issues and treatments, but let's not distort the facts. He played all last year under pain management treatment and was visibly hampered by his injury regardless. If they didn't rest him for 6 weeks after the GF, they're at best overly optimistic and at worst, incompetent. If he broke down or deteriorated as a result of some preseason work, then they could have rested him from there at the very least. But we're now in June. That's 22 weeks this year they have had. Even if they rested him at the end of January, they should have made the call end of March at the latest. Instead, we're a further 8 weeks down the road.
I'm not a club basher, but I don't accept bullshit. If this was an isolated case I'd accept it. But it's not, it's a pattern of really poor injury management. And it coincides with the appointment of certain people, and the implementation of certain systems.
The jury is in.
Especially when resting has helped several times in the past! Why the hell would anyone jump straight to surgery first?!Has anyone thought perhaps Brad didn't want surgery unless he had to?
Me personally if there is a possibility that something can resolve itself without cutting into me id take that option.
I always enjoy your input and well measured responses. It's ok to be angry at the club, but Brad's delayed surgery has merits that I feel a lot on here aren't understanding the concept of "surgery failure rates" and "complication risks".Unfortunately in Brad’s case, surgery is an absolute last resort. Not just because of the risks involved, but because it’s just not that good. I agree that questions need to be asked as to whether we were at “last resort” a long time ago. Trouble is, in isolation, their management is fine, but there’s been a number of cases where we’ve pushed ahead too long with conservative management and ended up with players having surgery at less than ideal times in the season.
These conditions, Brad’s, are extremely difficult to manage and I think questions need to be asked as to how it got this bad in the first place and I think the answer likely lies roughly in the same spot as the answer for our hamstring epidemic.
Out training loads/programs have been extremely poor and poor for 2 years now. There were signs last year with a spate of hamstring injuries early, but it seems instead of rectifying this, we’ve gone full steam ahead and some guys have come down with hamstrings, others with groin injuries. It’s all a sign of overtraining/poor injury prevention program.
You're just making up.stories to suit your opinions. The facts don't lie.How long he should have rested for is a subject of opinions, and it would be of a better opinion if all the facts were given to us. Brad's case is an isolated case, because he's the one that has not had one full season with us without a given injury/issue throughout his time at the Crows. There is no BS involved in Brad's case, because I keep repeating and I'll say it again - surgical decisions are not made by the club, they're made by the specialists in conjunction with Brad, weighing up all the pros and cons. You're also making a big assumption he had been rested for 22 weeks without any improvements, but I reckon he had gotten better somewhere mid-way and then another flare-up happened again.
In Brad's particular case, surgery also wouldn't guarantee a prolonged success because if he's genetically non-robust in the groin region, then what's to say it can't crumble again? Surgery is not a guarantee, and it's an emphasis I'm making, more in Brad's case (compared with all other players on our list). This is most likely why they're trying all the conservative measures first before making this final decision.
Sorry, when did this fairytale happen?Especially when resting has helped several times in the past! Why the hell would anyone jump straight to surgery first?!
And are you in a same position who has experienced or a witness to severe complications or surgical failures as others? If not, then you need to take a step back and think about why there is a delay in the surgical decision.Are you a professional sports person who makes hundreds of thousands off playing and has a significant interest in the fastest recovery?
If not, I'm not sure that you're in the same position.
When he's seen playing AFL games with us, and in between episodes of him having "groin issues".Sorry, when did this fairytale happen?