One reasonable game and it’s a tick? Wardlaw and Sheezel were hardly speculative picks and what we paid for CCJ was laughable. 90 percent of the time he has looked terrible for us as well. He is just too slow and lumbering to ever be a consistent threat. You are really looking at things with rose coloured glasses if you’re using one game as evidence to justify Rawlings but conveniently ignore every other game.Funny how he looks like he’s done a good job when the playing group bring effort and the game plan clicks.
Whilst it’s reasonable to question all aspects of the club, the critics need to be consistent.
Phillips, Powell, Ford, Bergman, Wardlaw, Sheezel, Drury, CCJ all looked like big ticks yesterday.