How is it that Bolton is part of our future plans!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
How is it that Bolton is part of our future plans!
how long?The club has a whole as put in so much effort into a long term plan, why not try to see it through. Otherwise it’s a waste of time
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Apparently we need to count to 66.how long?
you're not guaranteed
you need markers along the way so people buy into it as they come up
at the moment we have over yonder.. trust us!
that's where they have gone wrong!
I'm not sure how some people are missing this!
it's very simple
You're right.how long?
you're not guaranteed
you need markers along the way so people buy into it as they come up
at the moment we have over yonder.. trust us!
that's where they have gone wrong!
I'm not sure how some people are missing this!
it's very simple
Apparently we need to count to 66.
no they didn'tYou're right.
66 games.
It's all they've said the entire time. 66 games is what it was going to take before the coaches had a base from which they could begin. But you knew that already.
I honestly do not know why we are playing 4 talls in the back line ??
no they didn't
they just said 66 game reset
they haven't mentioned what happens
unless I'm missing something
please find it
Your coach?
Hmmm... You do support Carlton, correct? Or is this an alt account for another club, and it's taken this long for you to slip up?
As for the content of what you're saying, you cannot pick and choose. Either we play the kids - all of them - and we get outrun and beaten and yes, we play too tall, or we play the senior players and get beaten regardless and you have people like theheatleystand and carlton2thebone complaining about how the kids always get dropped for no hopers.
And I find it interesting that it's the backline you're bewailing, when its the height of the forward line and the relative lack of speed through the middle that is tearing us up after turnovers, as they lack the pace to get back behind the ball in time to affect the next contest.
Um, no.no they didn't
they just said 66 game reset
they haven't mentioned what happens
unless I'm missing something
please find it
no they didn't
they just said 66 game reset
they haven't mentioned what happens
unless I'm missing something
please find it
And that’s what I and many others have been screaming about on Thursday night most of this year, that because Bolton wanted to add these players in whilst still playing our young talls then we start off matches at a disadvantage before the ball is even bounced.
This is our <190cm list.
Injured: Williamson, Docherty, Byrne, (Lang), Cuningham, (Pickett)
Rookies: Shaw, McDaid, LeBois
Midfielders: Kennedy, Kerridge, Dow, O'Brien, Graham, Curnow, Murphy, Petrevski-Seton, Fisher
Forwards: Lamb, Garlett, Wright, Polson,
Able to play back: Thomas, Mullett, Simpson
We literally have three guys who have the skill set to be able to play small down back who have been healthy. Wright has played out of position some of the time to his detriment. Our midfield is short on talent enough as it is already. There are no other players able to play down back that are small.
Lang and Pickett have been injured on and off during the entire season. Neither is really a small defender anyway.
We play tall down back because we have no other choice.
We've been crucified by injury and paid for mostly intelligent list design management. You draft bigs early as they take time to develop. Unfortunately it has meant that in the short term we lack numbers in the small department.
I just hope that when SOS ends up signing a flanker or two nobody is stuck in the past and screams about having too many flankers.
You can only select the personnel that you have at your disposal. Unfortunately, the list is out of wack this year and it has been exacerbated by injuries.
You need to understand the list management philosophy that SOS and co have used. From that end it makes sense.
We're too tall because that's who we've got to roll with.
No doubt our list isn’t complete yet, no doubt SOS and co went for the talls first because they take longer to develop, no problem with that strategy at all.
The issue isn’t why we have so many talls on our list right now, that’s been discussed as naeusiam.
I was responding to a post I was mentioned in that stated that we have if we want to play all our young kids then we go in to tall.
I couldn’t agree with that, it was Bolton’s insistence to keep including the likes of the 5 older no hoper talks I mentioned in my previous post that ensured we kept going in too tall when we also included our young talls.
Just clarifying....
Because, when you observe the complete list SOS has picked since he came to the club, you'll notice that the rate in which he's picked up talls against smalls has been roughly the same (across trades and drafting). This is despite the fact that in an AFL context you realistically need about 5-6 talls and 15-16 smalls to build a side.Seeing as how you mentioned me and suddenly I don’t have privledges to post in the other forum to continue our discussion, I’ll answer this instead.
Why are they linked, playing all the kids and playing too tall?
I mean, players like Casboult, Rowe, Jones, O’Shea, mullet, Kreuzer are all talller older bodies, the first 5 of them no hopers in my opinion.
So of course when you add these older no hopers into the team it naturally means you either have to drop the younger talls to stop from going even taller or logically go in even taller when you include them.
And that’s what I and many others have been screaming about on Thursday night most of this year, that because Bolton wanted to add these players in whilst still playing our young talls then we start off matches at a disadvantage before the ball is even bounced.
Surely we dont need to be spoonfed anymore do we ?no they didn't
they just said 66 game reset
they haven't mentioned what happens
unless I'm missing something
please find it
I din't need to work out for myself that round 2 2015 we were going to have a 66 game rebuild that was going to take us to a wooden spoon on 2018You can't work that out for yourself?
What did you think the 66 game reset meant?
So my question to you is this:
Which small players have been healthy that you would give games ahead of the older talls who shouldn't be played?
We just don't have the cattle. There isn't anyone worthy of games that is missing out that isn't tall (e.g. Harry McKay).
spoon fed?Surely we dont need to be spoonfed do we ?
Is it not obvious by looking at our midfield that we need atleast another off season to fill some more gaps in the side ?
Surely we can work that out .
Then hope for a better run with injury and further development over the coming 2-3 years .
Point being, we can definitely field a team where it’s no too tall and has way less no hopers included it in if we wanted to, this week shows that.
Because, when you observe the complete list SOS has picked since he came to the club, you'll notice that the rate in which he's picked up talls against smalls has been roughly the same (across trades and drafting). This is despite the fact that in an AFL context you realistically need about 5-6 talls and 15-16 smalls to build a side.
We play a side without some of the kids, to ensure that the ones we already have in the ones are not unduly exposed, you have a whinge that we're not developing the kids (not without a basis, but still). We play all the kids, we're tall and unfit - due, in part, because from the drafting side of the ledger SOS has picked up a tall two out of every three picks - and we cannot run with our older stronger opposition, and you have a whinge about our lack of leadership and our poor development.
Look, I've become rather fed up. I'd prefer to come on here and commiserate with people concerning our fortunes this year. I enjoy a good argument, but I find that to be more or less all I'm doing recently, as I read attacks and vitriol and just nonsense, like someone left an overactive rottweiler puppy inside and it tore the place up. I understand that people - like you - are frustrated by a lack of perceived progress. Believe me, I get it. But constantly bemoaning the state of things, constantly grouping everyone that disagrees with you into some ubiquitous globule of internet people who disagree with you - 'heads in the sand, take your navy glasses off'; honestly, only on the Carlton forum of Bigfooty would you actually have a muppet trying to tell someone else that their support of Carlton was a bad thing! - being defensive and changing the goalposts on what exactly the argument is makes me beyond irritated, and into angry and tired.
I can keep this up, C2DB (hey, that's a catchy acronym!). I can and I will, because I have standards I refuse to let lapse. But one of the things I do miss isn't the sense of optimism as we headed into this season, or the season before. It isn't the humour that we still see, usually around Wednesday after the red haze has worn off from the weekend and before we've all talked ourselves into believing we can win again. It's in the good spirited arguing that simply doesn't happen anymore.
Right now, this board is split, fractured into individuals that support a team yet cannot stand to talk to each other. Once upon a time, we'd argue and we'd disagree, but now we have whole pages needing to be removed by the mods, with posters getting suspended left and right because each of us are too raw to truly not take things personally.
It saddens me, that we've come to this. But, like our side, we can only move forwards in time.
We have the talent in the squad, and every now and then you catch a glimpse of it. This is as good a draft as any to come last in, provided we can leverage our selections to ensure that we get multiple picks inside the top 20, as while there's lots of key position talent, there's also shitloads of midfielders, and while there are outside mids the majority are in/out or hard ball earners. There's x-factor all the way to the late second round.
This isn't really to do with Bolton, so if we need to continue this, quote me in List Management. Just realise that, while I do and probably will continue to disagree with you and the way you argue at times, we need to be a part of improving the discourse on here, and at the very least part of that starts with me.
Theyve been open and honest what is it you want to clarify whether its a reset or rebuild ??spoon fed?
you call that spoon feeding?
transparency and markers going forward are now called being spoonfed
Yet we still lost by 10 goals to a team a few places above us on the ladder...
Phillips and Weitering both missed. Highly likely that if both were available they both would have played. Either that or Harry goes in with Phillips being dropped.