- Jun 30, 2014
- 10,169
- 5,512
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Banned
- #1,201
League are kings of government fundingLeague is King up here. Rightly or wrongly every other sporting code professional or amateur are fighting for the scraps of public funding.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
League are kings of government fundingLeague is King up here. Rightly or wrongly every other sporting code professional or amateur are fighting for the scraps of public funding.
FS1 is a de facto Fox League channel as it is.You'd think they'd have to have an aim of getting every game live. They'll be able to use the AFL deal as an example, and the world hasn't ended there. No idea about the Fox League channel - IIRC Fox Footy is used as a bargaining chip, and Foxtel throws it in (or takes it out) depending on how the deal with the AFL goes. It's of more interest to the AFL than to Foxtel, probably as cheap advertising on the AFL's behalf (watch AFL at any time...). Is it as appealing to the NRL? No idea.
This really is becoming a bigger issue as we continue to struggle to find a place to call home. We are essentially a 3rd world country in terms of our facilities compared to other clubs. Shame on the past administrators for letting it get this bad. We should have had this sorted off the back of the 3peat but now we are trying to find land and funds when we can't get a win on the field.
A few of us have highlighted the importance of our facilities in comparison to the rest of the league and how this would play a major part in our retention in another thread. This for me is our greatest concern at the moment out of a number of issues. Gilly would obviously know the state of our facilities and I would like to know what is happening on this front. Head office (AFL) come out saying that we are now on their radar again and this should be front and square of their issues to fix. It obviously takes $$$$ and lots of it. Why couldn't we take out a 'loan' from the AFL with a requirement to pay it back over a large duration of time with minimal interest or even none. Why not $50mil over 50 years @ $1m payment a year or something crazy like that. It's just a thought.
I don't think the issue is trying to find a location. Regardless of where we build, we can't raise the funds. A more expensive build on a flood prone site would just exacerbate the problem.With those sites in a prime location but are affected by flood is it possible to flood proof the site by raising the land level and adding suitable drainage...cost in the short term will be painful but could be the long term solution.
As a lot of the local AFL clubs experience all the timeI don't think the issue is trying to find a location. Regardless of where we build, we can't raise the funds. A more expensive build on a flood prone site would just exacerbate the problem.
.....also another idea. Why not develop the Gabba and use that for all training........seems the sensible, obvious thing to do. Just have to get the Gabba people to see our way of thinking.......after all, we are their main tenants, they need to learn to be more agreeable and co-operative.
Its not like it is used for anything else at this time of year...we are the only ones to use it.
.....also another idea. Why not develop the Gabba and use that for all training........seems the sensible, obvious thing to do. Just have to get the Gabba people to see our way of thinking.......after all, we are their main tenants, they need to learn to be more agreeable and co-operative.
Its not like it is used for anything else at this time of year...we are the only ones to use it.
If we leave the Gabba who will become their major Tenant? They have a bit to lose in this as well I would of thought. Is this a game of bluff with the Gabba management to make some significant changes?