Essendon set to have picks 10, 24, 26 and a pick in the low 30s, along with Mark Williams but lose pick 16 and Nash to Power. I don't see how Essendon lose, they seem like winners to me?
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Burgoyne nominates Hawthorn? (part II)
- Thread starter brogan2motlop
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Where'd you hear that from?
RussellEbertHandball
Flick pass expert
Some people just need to stop and take a breather.
When Rohde was interviewed at about 7.25pm EST, it sounded in his voice as if it would be quiet awhile before everything would be finalised.
So don't be surprised if you don't hear the full details until after 9.30pm or even until tomorrow.
Some players may need to be contacted and if they are uncontactable the details wont be released.
The media do not know the full details, they are just speculating. Just be patient and wait!
When Rohde was interviewed at about 7.25pm EST, it sounded in his voice as if it would be quiet awhile before everything would be finalised.
So don't be surprised if you don't hear the full details until after 9.30pm or even until tomorrow.
Some players may need to be contacted and if they are uncontactable the details wont be released.
The media do not know the full details, they are just speculating. Just be patient and wait!
Adam White's twitter http://twitter.com/Whitey927
It seems highly unrealistic that they get 10, 24, 26 and a pick in the low 30s, Mark Williams just for 16 and Nash, he must of got confused
EDIT: they already had pick 10 from the beginning
Kickpuncher
Now I am become Donuts, the Destroyer of Ports
- Feb 13, 2007
- 12,464
- 21,268
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Janus
Advocatus Diaboli
- Sep 9, 2007
- 23,418
- 57,309
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Dallas Cowboys, Chicago Bulls
If you didn't get Nash, it would of been a great deal for you. Now it's merely Good 
Coopers Pale Ale
Rookie
- Oct 15, 2007
- 49
- 1
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Liverpool FC; Seattle Seahawks
Junior for 9 and 16...
Well thats what it appears to be anyway...thanks to afl.com.au...
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/85877/default.aspx
Well thats what it appears to be anyway...thanks to afl.com.au...
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/85877/default.aspx
Kickpuncher
Now I am become Donuts, the Destroyer of Ports
- Feb 13, 2007
- 12,464
- 21,268
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Re: Junior for 9 and 16...
And Jay Nash apparently.
And Jay Nash apparently.
The Cats were also able to secure picks 40, 42 and 56 in return for pick 33 as part of a complicated multi team deal involving Port Adelaide, Hawthorn and Essendon.
on geelong site, seems strange.http://www.gfc.com.au/geelongnews/newsarticle/tabid/3933/newsid/85698/default.aspx
on geelong site, seems strange.http://www.gfc.com.au/geelongnews/newsarticle/tabid/3933/newsid/85698/default.aspx
FishingRick04
Brownlow Medallist
Re: Junior for 9 and 16...
I think the better questions to ask now. Do we use 8,9 and 16 either 1 or 2 to try and prize another pick.
either way after 16 I think our picks aren't that infleuntial.
So trade em away for Coughlan or Haselby to add some experience or Tuck even.
Plus Nash & Schultz plus top 3 picks is min of 5 retirements plus delistings. So far we have had 5 Shaun, Farmer, Toby, Blade, Peter
I think the better questions to ask now. Do we use 8,9 and 16 either 1 or 2 to try and prize another pick.
either way after 16 I think our picks aren't that infleuntial.
So trade em away for Coughlan or Haselby to add some experience or Tuck even.
Plus Nash & Schultz plus top 3 picks is min of 5 retirements plus delistings. So far we have had 5 Shaun, Farmer, Toby, Blade, Peter
Burningleviathan
Norm Smith Medallist
- Apr 27, 2007
- 8,662
- 5,011
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Dallas Cowboys, Houston Rockets
Re: Junior for 9 and 16...
So we lose No. 24, 40 and 56 & Burger and Gain Picks 9 - 16 and a fringe player. Sounds like we over paid to be honest.
So we lose No. 24, 40 and 56 & Burger and Gain Picks 9 - 16 and a fringe player. Sounds like we over paid to be honest.
Kickpuncher
Now I am become Donuts, the Destroyer of Ports
- Feb 13, 2007
- 12,464
- 21,268
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Re: Junior for 9 and 16...
So summing it up for now what draft picks do we have?
So summing it up for now what draft picks do we have?
Re: Junior for 9 and 16...
With the Carlton/Brissy deal breaking down,
time to offer #9 for the Fev?
Gives them an option of keeping the Fev and his problems, or taking the best available offer.
With the Carlton/Brissy deal breaking down,
time to offer #9 for the Fev?
Gives them an option of keeping the Fev and his problems, or taking the best available offer.
Re: Junior for 9 and 16...
Multiple first round picks > late picks. Let's get Butcher, Cunnington and Panos.
I'm sure we'll pick up Jumpin' Jimmy Jo Jo out of Central District Under 15s with pick 72 anyway.
Multiple first round picks > late picks. Let's get Butcher, Cunnington and Panos.
I'm sure we'll pick up Jumpin' Jimmy Jo Jo out of Central District Under 15s with pick 72 anyway.
- Oct 8, 2004
- 18,531
- 25,374
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
based on that we have 3 draft picks
9
10
72
There is unlikely to be anyone worth drafting at pick 72 as the draft falls away dramatically after pick 20 - so that would be left for a PSD pick or used to upgrade a rookie (most probably d stewart who had a great end to the season with north).
gain nash as well as schulz
lose s burgoyne and farmer
retired p burgoyne, lade, thurstans
9
10
72
There is unlikely to be anyone worth drafting at pick 72 as the draft falls away dramatically after pick 20 - so that would be left for a PSD pick or used to upgrade a rookie (most probably d stewart who had a great end to the season with north).
gain nash as well as schulz
lose s burgoyne and farmer
retired p burgoyne, lade, thurstans
Janus
Advocatus Diaboli
- Sep 9, 2007
- 23,418
- 57,309
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Dallas Cowboys, Chicago Bulls
Re: Junior for 9 and 16...
Absolutely. I think people get hung up on how many picks they have at the end of trade week. It's not important. What IS important is drafting quality players - and having 8, 9 & 16 it will be much easier to do so than having the 8 & 24 we started with.
Besides, the talk is the draft drops away after 30 or so. We don't need fillers.
Absolutely. I think people get hung up on how many picks they have at the end of trade week. It's not important. What IS important is drafting quality players - and having 8, 9 & 16 it will be much easier to do so than having the 8 & 24 we started with.
Besides, the talk is the draft drops away after 30 or so. We don't need fillers.
Well Choco did say Port will be targetting new players.
Nash and Schulz are STUDDS.
Nash and Schulz are STUDDS.
FishingRick04
Brownlow Medallist
Wouldn't we have 8,9, 16 plus 72?
Fine by me.
Lose Shaun, Mitch, Blade, Peter and Toby. So 1 more needs to make way?
I would like to see us trade 9 and 16 for pick 4,5,6 or 7 plus a player from one of those clubs if possible.
Re: Junior for 9 and 16...
Nope, obviously we wouldn't be using those picks anyway, so gave them out to whoever wanted them to get this deal done. Win - Win scenario.
