Banter Carlton is better in 2024. Who will be better in 2025? Carlton or Collingwood? Part 3

[HeathySure]

Your best player is a high draft pick but they are "meaningless" in winning flags...?

yes. Every team has high draft picks, some have multiple number 1 and top 10 picks, in fact 25 years of them and cant get closer than 1 prelim in 25 years.

 

[carlton_99]

yes. Every team has high draft picks, some have multiple number 1 and top 10 picks, in fact 25 years of them and cant get closer than 1 prelim in 25 years.

So they aren't meaningless - glad we agree

 

[HeathySure]

So they aren't meaningless - glad we agree

they arent totally meaningless if you get a game winner. They come along maybe once a year if that though. Otherwise you struggle in the depths of despair for years... you should know..
anyway as an aside Tigers could have 15 picks in a superdraft year, it wont matter, without good elder players they will be in a deep hole for the next 10 years

 

[carlton_99]

they arent totally meaningless if you get a game winner. They come along maybe once a year if that though. Otherwise you struggle in the depths of despair for years... you should know..
anyway as an aside Tigers could have 15 picks in a superdraft year, it wont matter, without good elder players they will be in a deep hole for the next 10 years

Yep a balanced list approach is key - not only for the now but also for the future

 

[Worm4]

That's quite funny. And desperate.

You see , this is why there is no point getting into a reasonable discussion with you.
You make a statement about a top 15 list which you have compiled on my football club, then when I bring up a few names in discussion, you merely refute those claims as they aren't in agreeance with your random list. It's like your list can not ever be questioned because you have compiled it , and that is the only list that can be discussed .
You're a joke mate. Keep on pasting away useless stats for your own giggles - end of the day they are all pretty meaningless

 

[Fadge]

You see , this is why there is no point getting into a reasonable discussion with you.
You make a statement about a top 15 list which you have compiled on my football club, then when I bring up a few names in discussion, you merely refute those claims as they aren't in agreeance with your random list. It's like your list can not ever be questioned because you have compiled it , and that is the only list that can be discussed .
You're a joke mate. Keep on pasting away useless stats for your own giggles - end of the day they are all pretty meaningless

Let's be clear.

You questioned whether Dan McStay was in Collingwood's Top 15 players, and countered with Silvagni as one of Carlton's top 15 players.

You've then gone on a rant about me refuting other posters' claims because they're not in agreeance (which isn't even a word) with me.

And you're calling me 'a joke'?

Wowee.

 

[WalshistheGOAT]

Let's be clear.

You questioned whether Dan McStay was in Collingwood's Top 15 players, and countered with Silvagni as one of Carlton's top 15 players.

You've then gone on a rant about me refuting other posters' claims because they're not in agreeance (which isn't even a word) with me.

And you're calling me 'a joke'?

Wowee.

Dan McSpud cannot be considered a loss to a team. He's the KPF equivalent of Owies

 

[Fadge]

Dan McSpud cannot be considered a loss to a team. He's the KPF equivalent of Owies

Again, go and watch the 2023 Qualifying and Preliminary Finals, and come back to me.

You guys aren't shy about showing your ignorance, are you?

 

[Scritchyscroony]

You see , this is why there is no point getting into a reasonable discussion with you.
You make a statement about a top 15 list which you have compiled on my football club, then when I bring up a few names in discussion, you merely refute those claims as they aren't in agreeance with your random list. It's like your list can not ever be questioned because you have compiled it , and that is the only list that can be discussed .
You're a joke mate. Keep on pasting away useless stats for your own giggles - end of the day they are all pretty meaningless

Let's be clear.

You questioned whether Dan McStay was in Collingwood's Top 15 players, and countered with Silvagni as one of Carlton's top 15 players.

You've then gone on a rant about me refuting other posters' claims because they're not in agreeance (which isn't even a word) with me.

And you're calling me 'a joke'?

Wowee.

The Fadge and Worm show in full flight. I see it's spilled over to the Slobbos top 50 thread too

Get a room you two ...

 

[WalshistheGOAT]

Again, go and watch the 2023 Qualifying and Preliminary Finals, and come back to me.

You guys aren't shy about showing your ignorance, are you?

I guess Jack Martin and Matt Cottrell are also key players because they played a few good games in a finals series? McSpud is a career spud. A couple of good games isn't going to change that.