- Jun 19, 2016
- 21,166
- 40,952
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Fair play if it works and you re-sign him for unders.Both sound about equal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Fair play if it works and you re-sign him for unders.Both sound about equal.
I wouldn't trade Bailey Williams for Chad Wingard
Have Port had their B&F yet? Really interested to see where Chad finishes.
Actually - keen on Port fans' view on how Wingard's season has been. I'll admit I didn't see much of Port this year and prefer not to just look at stats to form an opinion on things.
Even a fan is more credible than Hinkley and your list management these days.And that’s why you’re a fan and not a coach or list manager.
Or he is bullshitting on his social media.Shit post dude. Why bother going on BF if you are going to revert to this ?
It is clear Port have told him to explore his options, how could you say otherwise?
It is also clear through his social media that Wingard originally stated he had no plans to leave Port. Yet, now he is meeting with Vic clubs.
Based on this, it is also reasonable to conclude, whilst not impossible, there would be a significant strain on the relationship between player and club if he stays.
Further, lets not forget he is a restricted free agent next year and Port might be nervous he requests to leave. Especially when a year prior they put him in the shop window.
Port have weakened their trading position because they shopped him. He didn't ask to leave.
You're also presenting your points as facts, which is a blatant fallacy and completely diminishes your credibility.Right. Deflection?
You see, I am being very clear in my points and the reasoning behind this.
I'm not up for trading Williams but if it's Wingard or Williams, sorry to see you go Bailey.And that’s why you’re a fan and not a coach or list manager.
You're also presenting your points as facts, which is a blatant fallacy and completely diminishes your credibility.
Or he is bullshitting on his social media.
Nothing is clear and any number of conclusions can be reasonably made.
I've already posted it. If you're really interested, and I suspect you aren't, you can find it a few pages back.Once again, what is your view Moonshift? That is, relevant to Wingard.
I wouldn't be saying this if I were you, not after making a fool of yourself with false, empty claims.Anyone with average intelligence
I've already posted it. If you're really interested, and I suspect you aren't, you can find it a few pages back.
I wouldn't be saying this if I were you, not after making a fool of yourself with false, empty claims.
No need to get so sensitive, just swallow your pride and admit you made a mistake.
Right here:What are my false, empty, claims?
Contract is irrelevant now dude. Port have clearly shopped him. Remember, originally Wingard spoke openly that he didn't want to leave. It's an untenable situation and he will leave the club. Port have in a way shot themselves in the foot here.
Shit post dude. Why bother going on BF if you are going to revert to this ?
It is clear Port have told him to explore his options, how could you say otherwise?
It is also clear through his social media that Wingard originally stated he had no plans to leave Port. Yet, now he is meeting with Vic clubs.
Based on this, it is also reasonable to conclude, whilst not impossible, there would be a significant strain on the relationship between player and club if he stays.
Further, lets not forget he is a restricted free agent next year and Port might be nervous he requests to leave. Especially when a year prior they put him in the shop window.
Port have weakened their trading position because they shopped him. He didn't ask to leave.
Right here:
I'm not 'saying' anything regarding Wingard & Port's relationship, just pointing out your foolishness.And? For me, it is clear. It is reasonable to conclude this.
So you're saying Port haven't shopped him yeah?
I'm not "saying" anything, just pointing out your foolishness.
You're saying it's clear Port are pushing him out the door based on your own social media speculation, and even rhetorically asking "how could you say otherwise?".
The sad reality is, you don't really know anything about what's going on between Wingard and Port, much as that pains you.
Right here:
There are enough hints in the interview to suggest they're very keen on this draft, and why wouldn't they be with all the SA talent.
I can see pick 7 + Dahlhaus compensation getting it done. That shitspewing twitter feed mentioned Bailey Williams, but I give that a 0% chance of happening, he's not homesick.
There are enough hints in the interview to suggest they're very keen on this draft, and why wouldn't they be with all the SA talent.
Probably right.Don't bother. He clearly doesn't get it and you are wasting your time.
Any number of reasonable conclusions, hence nothing is clear.Without doubt any number of reasons can be concluded.
I stand by my view, and my rationale behind this.
It's all played out very oddly, the president suggests he is on the block, he responds via twitter he wants to stay, now he is entertaining the idea of moving.
To me, reading between the lines, it seems pretty clear Port have shopped him if the price is right.
Any number of reasonable conclusions, hence nothing is clear.
Drawing inference from a players Twitter feed isn't what I'd call strong evidence.
No one really knows what's going on. It's purely speculation and nothing more.