Dogs_R_Us
Space Traveller
How close is Wallis to coming back?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hrovat was all class against Swans
hope he isn't sub this weekend
Agree with this, personally we have no other rucks who can play this role. Only difference is I would bring in Hamling for Cordy as he can play either end, including help Boyd with the back up ruck role. Biggs another week or there is an injury. An obvious replacement for Webb, but only if Webb is sore as he is super impressive.My choice would be to ruck Roughead, leave Fletcher -ROBERTS down back, I believe Fletcher must stay in know.
MORRIS to return later, Biggs terrific on weekend, things can be handled down back.
ROUGHEAD must play first ruck.
How close is Wallis to coming back?
Wood - Talia - Webb
M Boyd - Roberts - Murphy
Macrae - Picken - Johannisen
Dahlhaus - Crameri - Honeychurch
Stringer - T Boyd - Dickson
Roughead - Bontempelli - Wallis
Grant - Stevens - Jong - Hrovat
In: Wallis, Grant
Out: Cordy, Smith
Want to rest Clay and trial Roughie in the ruck. Hopefully Wallis is fit. Will back Grant to light it up in those conditions.
Hadn't considered their second ruck, somehow - did want to find a spot for Hammer, though.I like it Badger, but who plays on Hickey while he is up forward and Longer is rucking? Wood?
If we go down this path what about Hamling in instead of Grant to play down back?
Bontempelli's DE was far worse. It was wet weather a DE of 60 is pretty bloody good.Mmmm...I like Hrovat as much as the next guy, but I reckon this is a bit of a stretch.
Most of his kicks went nowhere near a teammate and his DE was 60. Also sprayed a shot at goal on the run, IIRC.
Great player - needs to work on his disposal, for mine.
Bonts was going at 37% mid way in the 3rdMmmm...I like Hrovat as much as the next guy, but I reckon this is a bit of a stretch.
Most of his kicks went nowhere near a teammate and his DE was 60. Also sprayed a shot at goal on the run, IIRC.
Great player - needs to work on his disposal, for mine.
So you bring in grant instead of giving a kid a run against a shit team ? Come on mateWood - Talia - Webb
M Boyd - Roberts - Murphy
Macrae - Picken - Johannisen
Dahlhaus - Crameri - Honeychurch
Stringer - T Boyd - Dickson
Roughead - Bontempelli - Wallis
Grant - Stevens - Jong - Hrovat
In: Wallis, Grant
Out: Cordy, Smith
Want to rest Clay and trial Roughie in the ruck. Hopefully Wallis is fit. Will back Grant to light it up in those conditions.
I hear ya... But I think it's not anti-Will sentiment, I think people just wanna see Ayce get some more experience and GET BETTER ASAP, seeing as though Minno will be entering the twilight of his career shortly...Just wondering how many would be sticking up for Minson or Campbell if they performed the same as Cordy has and had been subbed off twice in 4 games, I think there is a bit of personal hate in regards to Minson on rumours from last season.
Agree with this, personally we have no other rucks who can play this role. Only difference is I would bring in Hamling for Cordy as he can play either end, including help Boyd with the back up ruck role. Biggs another week or there is an injury. An obvious replacement for Webb, but only if Webb is sore as he is super impressive.
How close is Wallis to coming back?
Think he's still a couple of weeks away
The thing is that was a hard game against a strong bodied team in the wet. Even if they pulled up ok, it's hard for young players to bring the same energy after a game like that. It should definitely be a consideration at the very least.I'm not for resting players who are for all intents and purposes playing ok. Injury or soreness that could lead to injury then I have no issue with precaution.
I'm not for resting the likes of Webb or Smith unless it's formed based. I'm also not sure we should make too many changes to a winning side. I think Webb is a bit special and unless he's buggered then I wouldn't be dropping him back just yet. Make him the sub before you do that.
We play the Saints this week and we cannot afford to drop the ball here. We must beat the teams around us and they are one of them. We should not mess with this team too much, tinker here and there is ok but no wholesale changes based on resting up guys. We ain't that good yet.
I'd look at making a change if Wallis is available and perhaps we'd look at do we need the extra tall defender or go with an attacking player like grant or hunter for Fletch this week.
If we think cords can handle the saints resting ruck when forward then we go again with him, and if not we bring in Will and use Toydy as the chop out.
On what basis? Have either demonstrated in the VFL their value in defensive structures and mobility? Have either demonstrated they bring more to the overall team than playing Roughy in the ruck with backup from Boyd and maybe a Hamling? Is Beverage changing his game structure to incorporate a pure centre bounce ruckman?Need Campbell or Minson in the ruck not Cordy and not roughead