- Banned
- #776
One I asked about.Which study?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
One I asked about.Which study?
'97% Of Climate Scientists Agree' Is 100% Wrong
Think about how many times you hear that 97 percent or some similar figure thrown around. It’s based on crude manipulation propagated by people whose ideological agenda it serves. It is a license to intimidate.www.forbes.com
Did you ever suck it up and say which paper was published?You talk a big game. Mate this stuff is in recent peer reviewed journals. It's not something you'll find on a basic google search. If HurleyHepsHird doesn't take up the offer perhaps you'd like to have that bet?
The following graphic will have no impact on the climate change deniers. Hopefully it will of the realists.
Except they didn’t. It is crackpot nonsense.Scientists fiddled with the data — ocean data, atmospheric data, put their temperature sensors too close to cities. Motivated wanting to keep their funding and get ahead in organisations such as the American Meteorology Society, American Geophysical Union, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science - which will not allow discussion from any skeptical point of view.
Let's build them all in Melbourne.
The “realists” know nothing can be done. The denialists pretend nothing is happening, and the fools think that socialism saves the environment (despite its appalling track record)The following graphic will have no impact on the climate change deniers. Hopefully it will of the realists.
Adelaide.Let's build them all in Melbourne.
Nah that's were we'll store the waste.Adelaide.
Nah that's were we'll store the waste.
If we could find a sustainable and safe way to reduce the waste then it would be a great option
Look at the debacle with Morrison in the pacific. Australia will continue to prioritise coal as a primary energy source as long as we have a liberal government.
You’d think by now the deniers and conspiracy theorists would realise technology and science is the reason we are where we are today and not chasing one another with sharpened rocks like cavemen.
If we could find a sustainable and safe way to reduce the waste then it would be a great option
Latest CSIRO report comparing the projected costs of various tuype sof power generations, Nuclear is just more expensive than renewables.
Why punt on a untested technology with massive development costs, massive development times and unresolved issues around waste?
I thought we were moving to low CO2 power generation to reduce CO2. It is proven that solar and wind can't achieve that, so do we choose failure or success?
Can you point to a single jurisdiction on the planet, that has a renewables strategy, that deliver 40-70g per kwhr, that doesn't rely upon hydro or nuclear? You'd probably struggle to find one that get within 5 times worse. Germany is likely to be 10-15 times worse than that in 2035 after blowing $1.5 trillion.
All of the US's waste would fit into a storage facility 6m X 35m X 15. That's tiny and given the "waste" can be reused in gen 4 reactor, this will shrink again to a small fraction of that.