Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The thought crossed my mind yes. I’m not a dumb one eyed supporter with this stuff. Clarko has a pretty long history of intervening in the players’ personal lives so the allegations were devastating but kind of unsurprising tooSo what did you first think about the allegations against Clarkson & your club?
Given your thoughts on the Collingwood matter, I assume that you thought Clarkson was guilty straight away as alleged?
Their complaints are all too believable, that's the problem the AFL finds itself in.So what did you first think about the allegations against Clarkson & your club?
Given your thoughts on the Collingwood matter, I assume that you thought Clarkson was guilty straight away as alleged?
But equally there are often times where a first glance of very detailed allegations showing a pattern of behaviour from a person whose job it is to document such behaviour should be a given a substantial amount of weight as evidence - it would take a hell of a different account to refute this. That’s not me jumping to conclusions - it’s me using my common sense
Yep - people keep being dichotomous with this stuff and say “procedural fairness - innocent until proven guilty” but it in actual fact the law will often have interim solutions until fact is found based on the seriousness of allegations: see bail, see family violence intervention orders, see interim accommodation orders in child protection matters etc.Goes without saying the Kelly needs his "day in court". But it is going to get very ugly if Pies back him in and then it is discovered that these allegations do have substance.
I think Pies safest course would be to stand him down in the interim. Appoint a caretaker and let the allegations go through the process. As CEO he has to be held to a much higher standard than most at the club and Pies can't afford to sit on their hands and wait for FW to adjudicate.
I'm sorry...were you in the presence of Kelly & Cleaver when all these things occurred?The Fair Work Commission case was unresolved. I know you Magpie fans love to do mental gymnastics to justify your point of view on any issue (Heritier, Ginni booing, Ginni getting caught doing Ketamine), but let's not lie here.
So what’s the bet Rabish Binney and Stax on the mill that you won’t admonish this poster for completely character assassinating the claimant based on a whole bunch of assumptions. Procedural fairness is good for rich CEOs but not for others I bet? Is that right ?The trouble is a lot of people in these made up touchy feely jobs are very toxic people, life hasn't been kind to them and they are bitter with the world and hate seeing anyone else happy, they thrive on causing kaos and dragging other people down to their sad lonely level
So what’s the bet Rabish Binney and Stax on the mill that you won’t admonish this poster for completely character assassinating the claimant based on a whole bunch of assumptions. Procedural fairness is good for rich CEOs but not for others I bet? Is that right ?
Whose the jerk now
Everyone was too busy having a good time to “bat an eyelid”.You are. Progress is just slow.
Every CEO would’ve spoken like this in the 80s and nobody would’ve batted an eyelid.
AFL needs to not do this club by club anymore. Sure we can jump on the pies to say WTF but it’s time that the AFL did a report for all clubs and stamp this shit out for good
Goes without saying the Kelly needs his "day in court". But it is going to get very ugly if Pies back him in and then it is discovered that these allegations do have substance.
I think Pies safest course would be to stand him down in the interim. Appoint a caretaker and let the allegations go through the process. As CEO he has to be held to a much higher standard than most at the club and Pies can't afford to sit on their hands and wait for FW to adjudicate.
Just goes to show: if someone is determined to be offended they will find a wayreading from The Age
Kelly is alleged to have said: “I really care about our Indigenous people.”
Thorpe pulled Kelly up on his comment, according to the documents, saying, “You don’t say ‘our’, we don’t belong to you.”
What would be more appropriate saying "those indigenous people"?
Yeah, but there were a number of people that looked at the complaints and said “all clear.” Include the Vic police, I think. Is that right? I don’t really know those details as I’m not paying close attention. But if some authoritative reviews have happened and it’s been cleared, then Collingwood can’t go saying “well, we will punish this now because it’s hit the media whirlwind.”
If the media and internets were mature about this, all would say, “Ok, let’s have a look at this in court and let the cards fall where they may.” But that maturity is sorely lacking now days so the frenzy will be cranked up to 11.
Everyone was too busy having a good time to “bat an eyelid”.
Yeah, but there were a number of people that looked at the complaints and said “all clear.” Include the Vic police, I think. Is that right? I don’t really know those details as I’m not paying close attention. But if some authoritative reviews have happened and it’s been cleared, then Collingwood can’t go saying “well, we will punish this now because it’s hit the media whirlwind.”
Even if everything alleged is true, I doubt anything criminal has taken place. It's really not about that. The bar for inappropriate behaviour is set very low for a CEO. They have enormous power within an organisation and need to very aware of how they use that power. That applies whether you are CEO of a footy club or BHP.
I am not saying Kelly should be "punished". Just that the safest course of action would be for him to step down from the role until due process has been conducted. To be honest, I would think Kelly would put up his hand himself and say in the interests of the club I am going to stand aside until the matter is resolved. Because the worst thing that could happen is BAU and then in 12 months it happens that these allegations are found substantiated.
I would normally agree, but if you're innocent and you know you are then I don't see how you could possibly bring yourself to do that knowing how the media would jump on that as an admission of guilt.I am not saying Kelly should be "punished". Just that the safest course of action would be for him to step down from the role until due process has been conducted. To be honest, I would think Kelly would put up his hand himself and say in the interests of the club I am going to stand aside until the matter is resolved. Because the worst thing that could happen is BAU and then in 12 months it happens that these allegations are found substantiated.
I would normally agree, but if you're innocent and you know you are then I don't see how you could possibly bring yourself to do that knowing how the media would jump on that as an admission of guilt.
Collingwood to wear all white?I think the punishment needs to be something Collingwood will actually feel.
Port get the prison bars jumper.