List Mgmt. Our Trade/FA, Suburban & Country Town Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

I'd do Richards, Noble and future first for Houston.

3 way deal. Port and GC squabble about picks, but Port want this year's 12 and GC will want the future pick as the big pieces.
It won't be enough. That's barely more than we gave away for Schultz and Houston is actually indisputably elite and coming off 2 AAs. Also has 3 years left on his contract compared to Schultz who had one year before UFA.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Who says Huston doesn’t do his ACL day one of preseason and never make it back. Taking two picks to the draft defrays the risk. Yes there is a chance both end up as busts but same with the player you bring in
We can change the past, embrace the present. Let the club do it's job, then worry about the decisions they've made.
 
I’ve literally given you the stats which you choose to ignore.
Picks 11-20 in the draft average 110 games. Thats role players at best. That’s a markov career.
The key word is average here. So no, the likelihood is that you’ll either get a 150-200 gamer or a bust, with a sprinkling of role players thrown in.
 
No flag, no BNF, no all Aus and didn’t play 100 games for two top 10 picks. If that was the return we got from the draft picks you’d say they were a bust
The only metric that even remotely shows the value of the trade is looking at the players drafted with those picks. In this case it's Treloar for Logue and Weiderman. Dunno if you want to continue hitching your wagon to this argument.
 
The only metric that even remotely shows the value of the trade is looking at the players drafted with those picks. In this case it's Treloar for Logue and Weiderman. Dunno if you want to continue hitching your wagon to this argument.
lol look at the other players available. At or after that pick. We wouldn’t have necessarily made the same decision as the clubs the picks got on traded to
 
It won't be enough. That's barely more than we gave away for Schultz and Houston is actually indisputably elite and coming off 2 AAs. Also has 3 years left on his contract compared to Schultz who had one year before UFA.
Different scenarios. No one valued those second round picks last year, because there were so many academy kids and teams didnt rate the draft enough to open a lot of list spots, so forget that second round pick part of it. Then with the future first, it ended being a lower number than expected in a draft that's value has also risen significantly since the deal.

If Carlton aren't willing to trade their current first, not sure how they're offering more.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

lol. So it’s okay to say let’s give up two picks as their bodies may fail like Scharenberg and Freeman yet the same logic can’t be applied to assess the risk of the trade the other way
How are you not getting this? Nobody is saying that the risk is that their bodies might fail. It's that they won't be as good of a player as the one that we're trading for. Future injuries can't be factored into any trade scenario.
 
lol. So it’s okay to say let’s give up two picks as their bodies may fail like Scharenberg and Freeman yet the same logic can’t be applied to assess the risk of the trade the other way
If the only risk with Shaz and Freeman or any other draft pick was their body failing, I'd agree with you.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Our Trade/FA, Suburban & Country Town Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top