Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Our players could see it.Well the club doctor did give the green light to send him back out on the ground with a four broken ribs, a minor lung puncture and, more seriously, a lacerated spleen. Blind freddy could see he was cooked on the night when it happened and especially when they sent him out after the quarter time break.
He's on 1.5M though..
Thats more than anyone on our list.
When he came back ONTO the field on a stretcher is was pretty obviousOur players could see it.
No.Ed Allan was terrific on Friday night and has huge upside, plus a 194cm midfielder, who l would be loathe to lose.
If the Suns however said we are interested in Allan, so you trade us Allan, pick 33 and a future first for picks 10, 20 and Lukosius. Anyone doing that?
Surely dogs throw in a second rounder as a sweetener ?Fin McRae to the Dogs for Sam Darcy?
NoEd Allan was terrific on Friday night and has huge upside, plus a 194cm midfielder, who l would be loathe to lose.
If the Suns however said we are interested in Allan, so you trade us Allan, pick 33 and a future first for picks 10, 20 and Lukosius. Anyone doing that?
Hey Ed, after never considering trading you back home last year involving Lachie Shultz we've decided to reward your improvement this year by trading you 2000km further from home instead.
I'd rather keep the talented player we've already got on our hands. We're screaming out for another mid..and here he is.It wasn't only for Lukosius, its was also to obtain2 picks in the top 20 of this years draft, which could be handy in obtaining a free agent or just using in a very good draft....
I go back to the incident on match day itself and Melbourne putting him on the ground again.Rightly so, he has been treated like a dog in a third world country from what we've all been hearing since the incident.
Lynch is getting that money regardless, why would he play extra years for same dollars or renegotiate that over more years ?Surely someone isn’t gonna be giving lynch anywhere near that unless it’s a 3 year deal at the $1.5 total which would be a free swing I guess
3 years would be also to long I think
He’s body has been cooked last 2 seasons
Once traded can wage and all be re negotiated?
Same as the petracca talk. Re negotiations?
Get lost. No way.Throw in one of their bundle of first round picks then maybe we’ll consider
SR36 doesn't have a passport - he floats from gig to gig on dodgy visasI'm not sure sr36 is a real teacher. Who teaches English as a second language in an English speaking school. Sounds like a scam to me
I would have thought that if there is a valid complaint, it would likely be less specific Ie ‘medical negligence’ and more nebulous Ie ‘duty of care.’You’re clearly not a doctor.
Medical negligence is very difficult to prove legally. Very difficult.
It certainly isn’t making a call on limited information.
Negligence would involve something like having a scan in the rooms that showed internal damage and bleeding, yet letting him go out there. Even then, it would not be clear cut.
So we wanted Lynch when he was approaching his youthful best and was one of the most exciting forwards in the competition.
Now we will get the injury prone, and the best behind him version of Lynch who has played 8 games in 2 years....
If he wants to sit on the bottom of the ladder and get smashed every week that isLynch is getting that money regardless, why would he play extra years for same dollars or renegotiate that over more years ?
If you’re referring to a doctor then they are the same thing. A breach of their duty of care is negligence.I would have thought that if there is a valid complaint, it would likely be less specific Ie ‘medical negligence’ and more nebulous Ie ‘duty of care.’
Lynch is getting that money regardless, why would he play extra years for same dollars or renegotiate that over more years ?
He doesn’t even have to play, not a bad gig IMO.If he wants to sit on the bottom of the ladder and get smashed every week that is
Not medical negligence by the doctor, duty of care by the club.If you’re referring to a doctor then they are the same thing. A breach of their duty of care is negligence.
It’s more that the standard of proof in order to establish a breach of the duty is very high and so it should be because if it wasn’t we’d have no doctors.
It would also be impossible to sue the club as for one, the doctor is not an employee and even if he was, how could they be negligent considering that doctor has expert knowledge and the club would be entitled to rely upon it.
Basically, there’s not going to be medical negligence and nor would such a thing void his contract.
It’s more just the “vibe”.
Duty of care goes both ways. Trac also had a duty of care to himself and shouldn't have gone back onNot medical negligence by the doctor, duty of care by the club.
Do we know what the contracting language is around duty of care?
Look, I know sr36 is good at wordle and that but he sounds like the High Plains Drifter to me. Snake oil salesperson evenSR36 doesn't have a passport - he floats from gig to gig on dodgy visas
@Borderforce please action
Said free swing if it was $1.5 in total and went over 3 yearsrich have no need for a salary cap dump of lynch, there’s no pick involved. They are losing plenty already.
He’s been cooked for two years. And his heavily backended contract is a hard no. It’s not a free swing. It’s a bloody expensive one