List Mgmt. Collingwood Trade Talk 2016 Part 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Mayne and Hoskin-Elliot will be good additions to our forwardline. Hopefully we get both deals done, our forwardline is going to be quiet dynamic next season.

Fasolo - Moore - Mayne
Elliot - White - Hoskin-Elliot

I actually quite like it. If White can continue his serviceable form from late in the year then happy days. I believe Mayne will be a really good addition, he needed a change of scenario in my honest opinion.
 
Mayne and Hoskin-Elliot will be good additions to our forwardline. Hopefully we get both deals done, our forwardline is going to be quiet dynamic next season.

Fasolo - Moore - Mayne
Elliot - White - Hoskin-Elliot

I actually quite like it. If White can continue his serviceable form from late in the year then happy days. I believe Mayne will be a really good addition, he needed a change of scenario in my honest opinion.

That forward line doesn't fill me with confidence at all.
 
That forward line doesn't fill me with confidence at all.

Fasolo - showed potential of being a 40-50 goal player this year barring injury
Elliott - comes back hopefully in 2014/15 form and could potentially have a similar output (inarguably our best forward when on song)
Mayne - serviceable role player in the forward line, upgrade on Blair
Moore - developing KPP, no point putting any goal targets on him but obviously has the potential in spades
White - serviceable to good, pinch hit in the ruck and showed at the back end of the season that he's a serious contributor
WHE - topline pick, huge upside

I honestly don't see how that's too bad of a forward setup.
 
Every day that passes by with no trades... just means that the next days ahead are going to potentially going to get more intense.

Now we have 6 days left.

Any chance we could spread it all out rather than have 20 pick swaps on the last hour next Thursday?

Its all dick swinging for the first couple days.
 
Poor form Hawthorn! This one stinks worse than our decision to move Shaw. What sort of message does it send to have a guy take unders for a number of years only to turf them out for the shiny new toy? I never expected to see something like this from them. Fair enough if he nets them an early pick, but he's not going too so its just a sad situation.
my initial thoughts exactly...
 
With Blair being an RFA and therefore supposedly in our top 25% earners, does this alone effect what compensation we'd get for him?

Or does it solely depend on what his next club offers him, in the way of contract amount, length, etc.?

Surely if a club takes one of our "best 25%" players it would be grounds for some good compensation. Which would tell me that's been the club's planning going into this season, which would be smart.

Just on the provision that he was to go somewhere that is. There hasn't yet been any news on Blair AFAIK.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

With Blair being an RFA and therefore supposedly in our top 25% earners, does this alone effect what compensation we'd get for him?

Or does it solely depend on what his next club offers him, in the way of contract amount, length, etc.?

Surely if a club takes one of our "best 25%" players it would be grounds for some good compensation. Which would tell me that's been the club's planning going into this season, which would be smart.

Just on the provision that he was to go somewhere that is. There hasn't yet been any news on Blair AFAIK.
Blair agreed to a contract extension a while back I thought.

Only Brown and Williams have question marks over their heads now.

Williams wouldn't qualify for any compensation but Brown might. If we hadn't of taken Wells of course, who cancels out any chance of compensation for us.
 
Fasolo - showed potential of being a 40-50 goal player this year barring injury
Elliott - comes back hopefully in 2014/15 form and could potentially have a similar output (inarguably our best forward when on song)
Mayne - serviceable role player in the forward line, upgrade on Blair
Moore - developing KPP, no point putting any goal targets on him but obviously has the potential in spades
White - serviceable to good, pinch hit in the ruck and showed at the back end of the season that he's a serious contributor
WHE - topline pick, huge upside

I honestly don't see how that's too bad of a forward setup.

Moore has great potential & will be a star but is still a baby in terms of being a KPP
White - was okay last year but not much chop previously. Decent defender will smash him.
Mayne - Can tackle but I'm not convinced we should chase him at all.
WHE - Hasn't done much in the AFL to date, but admittedly don't watch enough of him.
Elliott - Injury cloud still there. Very good when fit.


I'd like another good tall forward in that line up.
 
Blair agreed to a contract extension a while back I thought.

Only Brown and Williams have question marks over their heads now.

Williams wouldn't qualify for any compensation but Brown might. If we hadn't of taken Wells of course, who cancels out any chance of compensation for us.

Oh, I just assumed he was potentially still on the way out.

I don't believe Williams is a free agent, is he?

I believe the ruling is that clubs with a "net loss" are compensated... so in theory if we lost both Blair (if he didn't actually sign an extension) and Brown to Free Agency, I think we'd be a chance for compensation, despite bringing in Wells.

Happy to be corrected on this, but Trade Radio's "rules of the NAB Trade Period" has a fair bit of emphasis on net loss.
 
Getting boring the trade period
Have you repressed the fateful trade period of 2008, where thousands died of trade atrophy? I still tell my grandkids of the week that I survived on nothing but scuttlebutt and innuendo only to return home and be spat on with the biggest trade of the week being Robbie f**king Warnock!
 
Oh, I just assumed he was potentially still on the way out.

I don't believe Williams is a free agent, is he?

I believe the ruling is that clubs with a "net loss" are compensated... so in theory if we lost both Blair (if he didn't actually sign an extension) and Brown to Free Agency, I think we'd be a chance for compensation, despite bringing in Wells.

Happy to be corrected on this, but Trade Radio's "rules of the NAB Trade Period" has a fair bit of emphasis on net loss.
Yeah, I believe there is a net loss equation, but gaining Wells would be about equal to Brown I reckon.

As you've probably seen by some of my posts, I'm strictly against any compensation for clubs at all when it comes to free agents. The system is way too messy.
 
With Blair being an RFA and therefore supposedly in our top 25% earners, does this alone effect what compensation we'd get for him?

Or does it solely depend on what his next club offers him, in the way of contract amount, length, etc.?

Surely if a club takes one of our "best 25%" players it would be grounds for some good compensation. Which would tell me that's been the club's planning going into this season, which would be smart.

Just on the provision that he was to go somewhere that is. There hasn't yet been any news on Blair AFAIK.
We're bringing in 2 free agents. We wouldn't get any compo.
 
Im curious as to who it was they were offered too... we must be pursuing someone that hasn't been leaked yet?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top