Yeah, but its a stupid arse contract that should actually lower his trade price given some mug is going to be stuck paying it.He is Contracted so no real Suprise we had to pay Tad Overs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yeah, but its a stupid arse contract that should actually lower his trade price given some mug is going to be stuck paying it.He is Contracted so no real Suprise we had to pay Tad Overs
Cloke is contracted too and we'll get peanuts for him..
Yeah, but its a stupid arse contract that should actually lower his trade price given some mug is going to be stuck paying it.
You could make the same justification of Witts' year.Or maybe he is actually a terrific player who just hasn't had a proper run at it due to injuries and being stuck behind other elite GWS talent?
They should be if we're giving a likely pick in the 20s for him.Maybe GWS are going to pay some of it.
Maybe GWS are going to pay some of it.
2nd for whe? Better include corr in that
I was gobsmacked when I saw his, (supposed) H/O stats in some of those games.Witts' work rate, overhead ability and total and utter lack of pace will never see him excel IMO.
His tap work can be good, but honestly watching him through the VFL finals and a couple of the H&A VFL games I never for a minute thought "oh he's definitely got a future".
I think we got exactly what he was worth for him.
Yeah, but its a stupid arse contract that should actually lower his trade price given some mug is going to be stuck paying it.
It's a little unfortunate that amongst all our injuries this year Grundy wasn't one of them. If Witts had of played a few games in the seniors as the sole ruck this year I think we would have got slightly more.Naturally Witts will look average when compared to his direct competition who just happened to be one of the Top 3 best ruckmen in the league this year and arguably THE in form ruckmen of the 2nd half of the season.
Witts would have easily been playing seniors in 10 other sides in the comp.
But...don't misinterpret me as saying Witts is a gun. He's not. He's a serviceable ruckman who has flaws he needs to work on. But his ceiling is still pretty high and were it not for Grundy's amazing 2016, definitely would have been playing seniors for us this year.
Thanks for the speedy reply.That isn't so Easy.
You don't have to do the deal just for the sake of it. WHE is highly injury prone, on a huge contract, and hasn't played much senior footy in a long time. We should get him for unders.He is Contracted so no real Suprise we had to pay Tad Overs
You don't have to do the deal just for the sake of it. WHE is highly injury prone, on a huge contract, and hasn't played much senior footy in a long time. We should get him for unders.
I'd be v.happy to snap up Xavier Richards with a low-ball bid at the death is still available. Would be an upgrade on Frost.
Not sure how you came to that. Pretty sure Horaceg was suggesting if we are premiers or runners up our 2017 2nd rounder would be pick 35, 36 and after compo picks could get pushed back to 40+. Big ifs.So if we are crap next year, you'll be happy with the WHE trade?
It's a little unfortunate that amongst all our injuries this year Grundy wasn't one of them. If Witts had of played a few games in the seniors as the sole ruck this year I think we would have got slightly more.
Come on guys, before this trade period everyone would have thought that it would costs a second rounder to get WHE.
It's only because posters here post their wishful thinking about landing him for bugger all, that everyone else buys in on and then accepts as fact, that makes you think we are paying overs. I reckon a second rounder is spot on.
You're doing this all wrong.