Toast Collingwood unbeaten in King's Birthday Fixture

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

LOL both rabid monarchists.
Feeling unfulfilled? Lonely? Under-appreciated for all your marvelous qualities, which only you seem to recognise? Not surprising; your sneering attitude and the sizeable chip on your shoulder towards anyone who might, through luck, circumstance or merit, have surpassed - in other peoples' minds - the insufferable love you have for yourself and your own cherished opinions, would keep decent folk a mile away from you, imho.
 
Indeed it was - she was far too young then.
Her mum and dad were one of the few exceptions to monarch unworthiness.
Inspirational leadership.
The fruit two generations down has fallen far from the tree.
She did Army Reserve/ Home Corps duty during WW 2
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The sad thing about the predicted demise of the monarchy is that all we’re left with are politicians. The royal family has always been slightly irrelevant to me but I’ll miss it when it’s gone. Long live the queen, the queen is dead.
 
Collingwood's Keating looking very pleased after giving HRH a little back rub


Queen Elizabeth II and former prime minister Paul Keating at Parliament House in Canberra during Queen's visit in 1992. Picture: AFP
 
Anyway, onto King Charles the III. Hopefully he has better luck than King Charles II
King Charles II was bloody lucky. Evaded capture by the roundheads by hiding up a an oak tree (which is why every 2nd pub in England is called the Royal Oak). Regained the throne only because Oliver Cromwell died, and Cromwell‘s son Richard was hopeless, bordering on imbecilic. Charles than proceeded to live the life of Reilly, with upteen mistresses and illegitimate children, but despite a life of debauchery was immensely popular cause the merry monarch was a hell of a lot more affable than the puritanical Cromwell. Even managed to get away with a life time of mascarading as a Protestant, when he was a closet Catholic…
 
King Charles II was bloody lucky. Evaded capture by the roundheads by hiding up a an oak tree (which is why every 2nd pub in England is called the Royal Oak). Regained the throne only because Oliver Cromwell died, and Cromwell‘s son Richard was hopeless, bordering on imbecilic. Charles than proceeded to live the life of Reilly, with upteen mistresses and illegitimate children, but despite a life of debauchery was immensely popular cause the merry monarch was a hell of a lot more affable than the puritanical Cromwell. Even managed to get away with a life time of mascarading as a Protestant, when he was a closet Catholic…
You had me spellbound until this.....

Screenshot_20220909-192317~2.png
.
WTF - mascara? - one of the classics and that's saying something
 
You had me spellbound until this.....

View attachment 1503914
.
WTF - mascara? - one of the classics and that's saying something
He lost me at: "despite" a life of debauchery he was immensely popular.

How bad was his spelling of "because of"
 
That was more her mum and dad?
Not sure about them but... .
Over the objections of her royal parents, she enlisted in the Auxiliary Territorial Service. Elizabeth II, longest-reigning monarch in British history, once served her country—and the war effort—as a humble truck mechanic.

2022-09-09_203822.jpg
 
The richest woman in the world dies and the world goes Gaga.
In more pressing news, related to all Victorians, our Parliament resumes in a couple of weeks and not one thing can be done by our elected representatives until they take an oath of allegiance to King Charles the 3rd.
Anyone comfortable with that?
Why even elect representatives of the people if they cannot represent without passing their loyalty to someone else other than those people? Someone on the exact opposite part of the planet.
In 2022 it simply beggars belief that this situation exists.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Toast Collingwood unbeaten in King's Birthday Fixture

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top