HotPiesWithSauce
Club Legend
Good game for Sidey to come back in, not expecting anything from him just want to see him get through
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
HH wasn’t bad either and I don’t know if Fin has done enough to push past him in terms of how we pick our 23. I’m a believer in the view of sr36 that we pick for specialist positions and whilst the gap might be closing between him and the guys in the best 23 I still think that in squad rotation is preferred. Definitely agree that sub rotation with those older guys is a big tick from me.Normally I’d agree, but coming off a 38 disposal game against relatively weak opposition, I’d have said it would have been likely that they’d give Fin a run if Mitchell was actually out.
As it stands though, I’m actually liking the idea of making the older guys the starting sub at this time of year. Managing their minutes strategically without having them actually miss games is a clever use of the sub rule.
I mean sure it's Carlton but you can't be serious that you'd rather the 2nd place team that's hot on our heels win than Carlton who's been largely irrelevant for the year. Win/win for sure, but some wins are bigger than others.Win win for us in that game. I lean towards wanting Blues to lose.
I'm definitely serious. I'd prefer Carlton lose to Port. As I mentioned above, Port is one of the least concerning teams for me. The higher they finish the better.I mean sure it's Carlton but you can't be serious that you'd rather the 2nd place team that's hot on our heels win than Carlton who's been largely irrelevant for the year. Win/win for sure, but some wins are bigger than others.
Unfair on Mitchell as he is starring and probably does not want to be rested.But is it? The reason is that MacCrea is not going to be part of our finals team, so why play him. We need to see how our midfield goes without Mitchell, just in case. I would rather we do that with Crisp or Adams taking Mitchells spot, allowing us to work on that option.
Definitely get your angle, but a Port loss this week basically locks in top 2 if we were to win next week. I’m on the Blues bandwagon.I'm definitely serious. I'd prefer Carlton lose to Port. As I mentioned above, Port is one of the least concerning teams for me. The higher they finish the better.
Also not worried about finishing first, 2nd is fine.
Likewise I can’t bring myself to wanting either the blues or power to win. A draw wouldn’t be the worst outcome; keeps Carlton & the 2nd round pick we hold low, offsets the powers point in comparison to ours.Port have 7 outs this week, so hopefully it upsets their team balance and shuts down their momentum.
It's clearly a ploy to have players fresh to play us - with any luck, it will backfire.
I'm torn really - I want both Port and the scum to lose.
Even if Carlton win they will not make the 8. Doubting it highly.Likewise I can’t bring myself to wanting either the blues or power to win. A draw wouldn’t be the worst outcome; keeps Carlton & the 2nd round pick we hold low, offsets the powers point in comparison to ours.
My 9 year old said much the same.That's what I'm hoping too when I've said I hope it bites them on the bum. I also don't want either to win, maybe a really tough, brutal, soul destroying draw would suffice.
Great minds think alikeMy 9 year old said much the same.
He needed two outs pre Nick Daicos’ shift to the midfield he probably needs three now.It’s unlikely Fin comes in at any stage for one of Mitchell, Pendles, JDG, Adams etc. because in that case we’d shift Crisp or Adams or Pendles inside more and pick a Ryan or HH or Ruscoe to replace the one that goes out. He needs two of that group to miss in order to come in.
Fair enough I don't rate Port all that much either but I would still prefer to not let them have that minor premiership if we can help itI'm definitely serious. I'd prefer Carlton lose to Port. As I mentioned above, Port is one of the least concerning teams for me. The higher they finish the better.
Also not worried about finishing first, 2nd is fine.
Perhaps but I doubt this factored in the decision at all.Playing macrae for one game would likely do more harm than good. He’d take time to adjust to the lvl, and playing one game then dropping him isn’t ideal. Not to mention the wolves that would come for him on here if he struggled with the tempo first up. We are here to win a flag, not play kids
Oh no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Tipped us to win by 33pts
Yep. Love it. When we had Ginni or Harrison in the 23, the sub came from small forward, because that's where the excess player was. But now that Nick has moved into the midfield, that's where the excess is and where the sub will come from. There's no doubt that Mitchell, Adams, Pendles, Lipinski are much better allround players than guys like McCreery and Hill, but if you want a bloke to apply defensive pressure and sit out wide and break lines with pace to create goals, it's McCreery and Hill all day long. And Macrae is not yet in the conversation with Pendles, Mitchell and Adams, yet.HH wasn’t bad either and I don’t know if Fin has done enough to push past him in terms of how we pick our 23. I’m a believer in the view of sr36 that we pick for specialist positions and whilst the gap might be closing between him and the guys in the best 23 I still think that in squad rotation is preferred. Definitely agree that sub rotation with those older guys is a big tick from me.
Don’t necessarily want top and play Melbourne week 1 of finalsEven if Carlton win they will not make the 8. Doubting it highly.
A good outcome for us.
Top spot plays 4th at the G
Melbourne would be a dream result for us and yes, just my opinion.Don’t necessarily want top and play Melbourne week 1 of finals
However I absolutely want top 2 (and avoid travel week 1) and Bris and Port losing this week would vastly improve the chances of that
Our clearance stats have risen this year because of Titch’s ability to get first use. If Crisp and Adams were capable of getting first use like Titch, he would never have been recruited.But is it? The reason is that MacCrea is not going to be part of our finals team, so why play him. We need to see how our midfield goes without Mitchell, just in case. I would rather we do that with Crisp or Adams taking Mitchells spot, allowing us to work on that option.
That’s definitely possible, but gut feel is he’s closer than that on the basis of Fly’s comments mid week. Unless that was fluff to keep him hungry which is possible I’m just not convinced.He needed two outs pre Nick Daicos’ shift to the midfield he probably needs three now.
If Titch is out a good chance Macrae is sub?That’s definitely possible, but gut feel is he’s closer than that on the basis of Fly’s comments mid week. Unless that was fluff to keep him hungry which is possible, but I’m not convinced.