Could equally move Pendles to HB and add Macrae.
Pendles is a mid, not a half back.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Could equally move Pendles to HB and add Macrae.
Are Port really resting 7 players this week end?That absolutely smacks of hubris to me.It looks like they’re sacrificing the Carlton game to be fresh for us.But it could backfire on them in a big way.
I’m not sure about this. I don’t think getting minutes into a guy who’s between 27-30 on our list (the named 23 + Checkers, WHE and Cameron at a minimum) is a need this late in the season.Yeah I would. I wouldn't consider it dropping, but managing. Macrae needs game time, is a similar player, and Mitchell is already only going to play 1.5 quarters.
We're two games out from the bye. If I thought Mitchell was being "managed", I'd agree with you, but I don't think that's the case. I think we've picked our 23 and there's a surplus mid. We're going to rotate the mids. Pendles next week or the week after.Yeah I would. I wouldn't consider it dropping, but managing. Macrae needs game time, is a similar player, and Mitchell is already only going to play 1.5 quarters.
But why? Why not give someone on the fringe a chance. And he's more an accumulator anyway rather than an impact player.
Internalise that sh1t, just doesn’t need to be put out there, support a Port loss but not ever a Carlton winBlues win is nice this week.
Let us be the one's to finish off their season in a few weeks time.
No current season stats available
I don't think Darcy is a good matchup for Cox, too strong. Expect Frampton will be first ruck. Jackson too mobile for Cox as well.Will be very interesting to see how we go in clearances without Cameron in ruck or Mitchell on the ball.
Why is HB or HF “rolling up” needed? Macrae could just come in for the injured mid. And one of Ryan, HH, Ruscoe in your scenario is not needed.They aren’t. My scenario requires a HB or HF rolling up to cover the mid we lost. How can that make our scenarios the same if your suggestions is a mid rolling back to HB? That would leave us a mid down on our current preferred setup. If a HF or HB went out I don’t think we’d be shuffling things to make room for Macrae and was being generous with my concession he maybe gets in ahead of HH or Ginnivan.
He’s frequently played HB under Fly, especially last year,Pendles is a mid, not a half back.
Preemptive resting. It’s what we should be doing. Hopefully Macrae gets a go.So rumours Hill out too?
We're starting to get a turnover.
If Hill is out, I’d think it would be Ginnivan who comes in.Preemptive resting. It’s what we should be doing. Hopefully Macrae gets a go.
Look for the club announcement rather than the AFL one. We’ve been naming the sun early for months now and it’s posted almost the instant that teams are named officially.I can't believe the AFL STILL hasn't made the sub naming a thing. I didn't even know Mitchell was sub until I read this thread. I just assumed he was being rested.
Suspect he gets subbed on for someone else in need of a rest (like an Adams) or likely Sidebottom, depending how the game pans out.
Nailed it, Fly's a smart guy and been in good winning systems before, he knows the best things to deliver on the last dance.I think McRae and his fellow coaches are totally focused on stability of line-up and getting as many games as possible into their preferred Finals team members. Wanting to maximise their team chemistry and trust to ensure that when the real pressure comes, they all know where each other will be and who is doing what.
I doubt niceties like getting games into Macrae or giving Ginni another chance is high in their thinking. Those guys will just have to bide their time, or leave.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Mate, that’s crap. There’s been games this year where Mitchell’s clearance work has been the difference for us. He’s not just an accumulator, that’s nonsense.But why? Why not give someone on the fringe a chance. And he's more an accumulator anyway rather than an impact player.
Or plug itIs that code for stick it up your arse?
Preemptive resting. It’s what we should be doing. Hopefully Macrae gets a go.
I’m not sure about this. I don’t think getting minutes into a guy who’s between 27-30 on our list (the named 23 + Checkers, WHE and Cameron at a minimum) is a need this late in the season.
Yeah, that's the debate isn't it? My thinking: if we get a few injuries -- say Adams and Mitchell together -- then someone like Macrae is likely to come in. Do we really want him coming in not having played at all this year?
Great dreamI woke from a dream this morning that we played the Suns in the Grand Final. The scores were 100 to the Suns and 10 to us at quarter time. With the last 30 seconds of the game after fighting back hard, Nick launched a torpedo from outside 50 and we won.
That's got nothing to do with this week though (or reality and RIP Dew's coaching appointment), and I'm happy with the ins. There are going to be more magnet shifts between now and finals, but hopefully they're going to find that balance that leads to glory.
I'm not going to underestimate Freo, but even if they put up their dukes we'll get on top easily.
No chance he comes in when it counts. We would move our flankers into the middle first and bring in more runnersYeah, that's the debate isn't it? My thinking: if we get a few injuries -- say Adams and Mitchell together -- then someone like Macrae is likely to come in. Do we really want him coming in not having played at all this year?