List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Whose future picks would you have preferred?


  • Total voters
    216

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links



Trade period
In:
12, F1, F2, F3, 73, Baker, Owies, Graham*
Out: 3, 63, F4, Barrass, Darling

*Free agent

Done deals

  • Jai Culley, Alex Witherden and Coby Burgiel delisted






  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Log in to remove this ad.

What a load of crap!!!!! Seriously whoever was finagling this deal is a complete and utter moron and should be fired and replaced before he bungles the Bolton, Rioli and Baker deals. Pick 42 will blow out to 52 and be borderline useless.

There’ll be no list managers left at this rate.

And come to think of it, why are we the only team that concedes late goals?
 
So we either had no interest in bumping up Graham's salary (effectively pick purchasing) to give Richmond a better pick which we could use in the Baker deal OR we lack this creativity.
Or we wanted to avoid four years of melts about role players using us as a retirement home and lining their bank balance on huge contracts.

No win scenario, the old trade and draft period.
 
In last year's Futures game, Xavier Lindsay showed us a glimpse of what he might be capable of as a rebounding defender. Tough in contested situations and elite with his disposal off half back, taking on creative and difficult options and executing with ease. One of the best performed players on the day.



Geez he’s a good kick, would much rather use 14 on him than a butcher like baker. Our team could really use an elite kick out of defence/on the wing


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I know I'm coming off belligerent when it comes to him, and I dont mean to since we clearly agree on the prospects much more than we disagree, but in what world is Travaglia's disposal so great, or better than (eg) Duggan's? I like him as a high urgency, metres gained player but he's hardly a surgeon by hand or foot. Lindsay yes.
Not belligerent, just a different opinion.

Firstly, Travaglia is an excellent decision maker. He is a penetrating kick but I wouldn’t call accuracy elite so on that specific point I see where you’re coming from. However he makes up for this by usually kicking within himself (which is part of decision making) so ends up nailing his short kicks. From my viewing in person and from footage when he kicks long he tends to kick into space to advantage which will also be important if McQualter is going with the game plan he’s suggesting.

Regarding his handballing I would absolutely describe it as surgical and among the best in the draft. It’s an ungainly action but it’s VERY effective. Numerous times with the ground ball in dispute he gets first hands to the ball and fires off a handball to the best option. When he’s got time and space his handballing is also very accurate and almost always to the best option.

His defensive work, reading the play and therefore intercept marking is also a highlight. He’s still to grow into his frame but if we drafted him he would walk into our back 6 round 1 IMO and could also push to a wing. I wouldn’t split pick 3 unless Travaglia is part of the plan.
 
His defensive work, reading the play and therefore intercept marking is also a highlight. He’s still to grow into his frame but if we drafted him he would walk into our back 6 round 1 IMO and could also push to a wing. I wouldn’t split pick 3 unless Travaglia is part of the plan.
My question though is: do you want to be using Pick 3 on a winger, when we need quality pure-blooded mids?
 
Just curious, obviously Lindsay very good with ball in hand, but what's his running ability like? Had he been able to compete at the combine where would he sit?

On SM-A155F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Good tank, no issues there whatsoever. Part of the reason he was able to consistently get so many possessions at CTL level throughout the year by getting to contests and to good areas to receive the ball.
 
Not always as black and white as you imply. You over pay a player, it can create waves in the playing group in the long run.

Tigers getting band 4 is only good news.
Agree 👍

Also Graham and Baker are isolated trades. While manipulating the Graham compo rules so Richmond do a good deal with us for Baker is theoretically possible, it's not risk free.

What's stopping Richmond from happily accepting band 1/2 compo for Graham and then telling us they still want 14 for Baker? Nothing.

We'd then be left with the bag - an overpaid player affecting our salary cap for 4 years + coughing up a high pick for Baker.
 
My question though is: do you want to be using Pick 3 on a winger, when we need quality pure-blooded mids?
It’s a good point, although I wouldn’t pigeonhole Travaglia or Lindsay as just HBF/wingers. Lindsay has shown all year he’s got a great clearance game and is a fantastic first receiver. Tobie definitely has potential to play in the midfield and is a lot stronger in the contest than most probably think.

Obviously the answer to that depends on the shape of the draft and how the club views Warner next year. Using a trade with Richmond as an example (3,14 for 6,10,Baker) I’d be very happy with Travaglia, Lindsay and Hynes and ok with Travaglia, Allan and Hynes.

A medium term midfield group including stints from those three, Harley, Hewett*, Hall, Johnson and hopefully Ginbey and Chesser and I wouldn’t call our midfield depth poor anymore. Kelly, Graham, Yeo, Baker to hold the fort until then and add Warner or a top mid next year and I’d almost say our midfield is looking strong going forward.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top