List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Whose future picks would you have preferred?


  • Total voters
    216

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links



Trade period
In:
12, F1, F2, F3, 73, Baker, Owies, Graham*
Out: 3, 63, F4, Barrass, Darling

*Free agent

Done deals

  • Jai Culley, Alex Witherden and Coby Burgiel delisted






  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Getting ready to boooo Barrass on Wednesday....

And double boooo him when we play hokheads at Optus next season....

MEGA
 

Log in to remove this ad.

They dont have to be insurance. They are kids who we rated highly enough who are yet to get proper exposure to the midfield.
We have already added Graham and are soon to add Baker.
Hewetts latest foot injury was in the opposite foot wasnt it?(or at least an unrelated injury)
Im not saying we never need to draft a mid again, but this year in particular, we dont have to.

Oh yeah we are set for mids - in what world? Wildly off
 
I'm not really after what people value him at, because that's really subjective. More interested in what other players in his circumstances were worth in previous trades.

Neal-Bullen, 2 and a bit years older for an early second would make it reasonable for Baker to be worth a late first, but it's a single data point.

You were disputing talent though - I’d take ANB over Baker if they were the same age. Agree the value gap is narrowed due to Neal-Bullen getting on a bit
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

No tweets from tonight's episode of Footy 'Classified' Furnace about the Eagles pick being up for grabs. Did any brave soul watch? Was it brought up at all? Promising signs if it wasn't.
They said something like "potentially" up for grabs but hard no to Carlton.

FWIW not really many other updates.
 
Mate no offence but you know f*ck all about what Pyke & the board think so stop acting like you do. Your a guy on a online forum who’s entitled to your opinion but stop talking like it’s a fact. Give it a break (You’re also not the only one)
Old Men Laughing GIF by ABC Network
 
Final predictions as get rolling:

Darling for a disappointingly late pick that will disappear into the tail end of a pick swap/thrown into a more complex deal. - Got the pick right, hopefully we can use it on Champion.

Baker and a pick in the 30s for 14. - Won’t be 14 but I suspect something like this will happen for the F1 received for Barrass. Stil confident it’ll be slight overs, despite the uncontracted status, due to Clarke’s Richmond history.

Jack Graham takes the 4 years on the table. Tick (but not exactly hard).

Barrass for 14 and F2 - 14 gone but I think it’s F1 (Hawthorn) and F2 (Carlton) now.

Clurey for something late. - Seems unlikely.

No Garcia (stays at Dogs) or Robertson (goes to some pointless Vic club). - Tick on Garcia and standing by this for Robertson - I’ll say St Kilda.

We retain 3 (4) for now… - Staying with this but no guarantee it makes it to draft night.

Checking in on my initial predictions.

Will add one more - no other players coming our way (other than Baker) - but we will have a few train-ons. Parfitt won’t be one of them, he’ll stay in Victoria.
 
He's nominated us because we offered him more money and years.

No way should we pay overs for him, but that doesn't mean we should **** him around to get him for free. A second rounder + something else should get it done
Weak argument..that's being nice, we offered a deal and money, we did not once promise a 1st round pick... Richmond are fu*king him, they were offered market value and said no.
 
We have competent inside mids, Reid, Baker, graham, Hall, Hutch, and Hewett is enough to work with for 1 more year alongside Yeo and Kelly.
We have grunt and enough bodies to get by.

We have basically 0 strong outside ball users, Maric has a great kick but lacks run, Ginbey can run but isnt a great kick, etc. Not a lot to work with. We also have very little elite in the pipeline for the backline.

Not going into it all again as ive been through it here before. More than 1 way to go about it is all im going to say
"Competent" doesn't cut it. We're trying to build for a flag, not mid table. You take the elite mids while you have the picks to get them.
 
We need elite talent in the backline too mate. The backline isnt just a place for failed mids and failed KPFs anymore
Sure, and you get them when you have the right draft picks. When you have a top 5 pick, in a draft full of elite mids, you take an elite mid.

In the nicest possible way, you have no idea. No club is doing what you suggest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top