List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Whose future picks would you have preferred?


  • Total voters
    216

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links



Trade period
In:
12, F1, F2, F3, 73, Baker, Owies, Graham*
Out: 3, 63, F4, Barrass, Darling

*Free agent

Done deals

  • Jai Culley, Alex Witherden and Coby Burgiel delisted






  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If Saints are the third team then possibly:

WCE
OUT: 3, 26, F3
IN: 8, 14, F2 (STK)

STK
OUT: 8, F3
IN: 12, 26

CAR
OUT: 12, 14
IN: 3, F3 (WCE)

Doesn't account for Owies. 14 becomes Baker + 24 + 51. Go to the draft with 8, 24, 51 63, 68. The latter three picks to come in 5-10 places each with Brisbane and Essendon's picks being swallowed up by bids.
Nah we wanted Pick 3, we get screwed by Carlton here. Would have never accepted that.
 
If we trade Pick 3 for Owies, 12 and Baker I will ****ing spew.

Since when was Baker EVER worth a high first rounder before the Vic media started pumping him up after the slightest interest in West Coast.

If 27 year old Owies is good enough to have his name near Pick 3, why is he being shopped so hard.

Trade period is a farce, player value and movement is controlled and heavily/unfairly influenced by Victorian media.

We are supposed to be hitting a DEEP DRAFT this year before Tasmania rock up and kill the draft for the rest of us.

I've tried to have a break from footy but I just can't listen to this garbage anymore. Particularly after the debacle with Hawthorn/Barrass. They better be ****ing good. Honestly.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

If Saints are the third team then possibly:

WCE
OUT: 3, 26, F3
IN: 8, 14, F2 (STK)

STK
OUT: 8, F2
IN: 12, 26

CAR
OUT: 12, 14
IN: 3, F3 (WCE)

Doesn't account for Owies. 14 becomes Baker + 24 + 51. Go to the draft with 8, 24, 51 63, 68. The latter three picks to come in 5-10 places each with Brisbane and Essendon's picks being swallowed up by bids.
Whats the incentive for the Saints here? 8->12
 
So whose definitely gone by Pick 12?

1) Lalor
2) Langford
3) FOS
4) Jagga
5) Smilie
6) Draper

Next tier:
  • Reid
  • Tauru
  • Travaglia
  • Armstrong
  • Trainor
  • Lindsay
  • Allan

So we’ll end up with one those?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Whats the incentive for the Saints here? 8->12
Extra pick this year. I don't know what their priorities are. They have a lot of decent players already.
 
We really need to get the 2 first rounders for Barass and trade at least one into this years draft if this trade happens. Also surely a second rounder from Richmond comes back in the baker trade. Makes it a little less dumb


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
If Saints are the third team then possibly:

WCE
OUT: 3, 26, F3
IN: 8, 14, F2 (STK)

STK
OUT: 8, F2
IN: 12, 26

CAR
OUT: 12, 14
IN: 3, F3 (WCE)

Doesn't account for Owies. 14 becomes Baker + 24 + 51. Go to the draft with 8, 24, 51 63, 68. The latter three picks to come in 5-10 places each with Brisbane and Essendon's picks being swallowed up by bids.
In what world do Carlton get another pick on top of 3 lol ?
 
So whose definitely gone by Pick 12?

1) Lalor
2) Langford
3) FOS
4) Jagga
5) Smilie
6) Draper

Next tier:
  • Reid
  • Tauru
  • Travaglia
  • Armstrong
  • Trainor
  • Lindsay
  • Allan

So we’ll end up with one those?
King Of The Hill Reaction GIF by MOODMAN
 
The melts are great on their own, but people desperately trying to figure out just who could be the mystery third club in a trade where we're getting Baker is a fantastic bit.
Richmond is the obvious one but it sounds like we're getting 14 and then trading it on which would imply Richmond isn't directly involved
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top