Daicos dangerous tackle on Daniel

[Cdog71]

Quite a few frees not paid I thought.
Strange he passed the test but the afl didn’t let him come back on.
Kingsley mentioned it in his presser

 

[FireKrakouer]

Very soft but it’s the standard this year that he should get 1.
There’s no way that happens though.

That is the incident the haters are crying about??

 

[Footy_Fan2007]

That is the incident the haters are crying about??

Well yeah. It’s soft but players have been suspended for it all year.

Similar to this -


Don’t panic though he’s not getting suspended.

 

[Xtreme]

No love for Bont?

It would honestly be Sicily's brownlow... if he wasn't suspended 9037490247 times this season

 

[Footy_Fan2007]

It would honestly be Sicily's brownlow... if he wasn't suspended 9037490247 times this season

To be fair I do have a soft spot for Sicily.

 

[FireKrakouer]

Well yeah. It’s soft but players have been suspended for it all year.

Similar to this -


Don’t panic though he’s not getting suspended.

No sling, no second motion, didn't even pin the arms, Daniel's right arm completely free. What infringement did he even commit apart from hurting the feelings of the haters?

 

[FAIRANDBALANCED]

Collingwood is the only team to have someone suspended for the GF in the last 25 years and it has happened twice. So many morons showing their age with absolutely no idea thinking there is some bias to assist Collingwood in a GF. Why? Every non Pies supporter will be going for our opponent.

 

[Footy_Fan2007]

No sling, no second motion, didn't even pin the arms, Daniel's right arm completely free. What infringement did he even commit apart from hurting the feelings of the haters?

Omg take a look. Surely you can see he pinned the arm. You can see his arm tucked around Daniels left arm right at the end.
He isn’t getting suspended so forget about it.
And I like Daicos. All I’m saying is MULTIPLE players have been suspended for a similar action this season.
Its soft but that’s the rule.

 

[420]

Daicos could shank a bloke with a home-made shiv and the umpires/commentators/MRO would still completely ignore it, no chance of a suspension.

 

[powerrrrrrrrrrrr]

Probably gets saved by the fact Pendles is holding his other arm as a contributing factor. Still drove his head down but that provides enough wriggle room.

 

[Satan]

Pendles will take the blame

 

[Leon]

1990 ?

Phil Carmen in the 70’s.

Jason Cloke 2002.

Anthony Rocca 2003.

 

[rye]

Probably gets saved by the fact Pendles is holding his other arm as a contributing factor. Still drove his head down but that provides enough wriggle room.

how about we meet halfway and suspend them both

 

[Shadow89]

It's DanielS...

 

[ChristianBoy]

Collingwood is the only team to have someone suspended for the GF in the last 25 years and it has happened twice. So many morons showing their age with absolutely no idea thinking there is some bias to assist Collingwood in a GF. Why? Every non Pies supporter will be going for our opponent.

Cloke knocked Edwards out with a king hit. He should have stood aside himself.

Rocca a raised elbow into Lades jaw.

There was no possible excuse for the AFL to get them off. Two of the worst incidents you’ll see.

 

[flamethrower]

HIA cleared = No Harm No Foul.

 

[gordo2016]

Omg take a look. Surely you can see he pinned the arm. You can see his arm tucked around Daniels left arm right at the end.
He isn’t getting suspended so forget about it.
And I like Daicos. All I’m saying is MULTIPLE players have been suspended for a similar action this season.
Its soft but that’s the rule.

Who are the multiple players?

 

[Orange Agent]

Michael Christian and a Collingwood player...

Nothing to see here folks.

 

[Yoda_]

Why is the gut punch on the far flank being overlooked as well?

Action needs to be looked at not the result.. Deserves a week for being a pleb, more so after throwing his head back when minimal if any head contact in a contact involving a tackle

 

[Orange Agent]

The point Kingsley has made post match can't be ignored. We lost a valuable player in the last qtr over this because the AFL docs insisted on a concussion test.

 

[CobberRodgers]

The point Kingsley has made post match can't be ignored. We lost a valuable player in the last qtr over this because the AFL docs insisted on a concussion test.

AFL just wants to have enough pages in their scrapbook containing empty “care” actions to try and dodge the eventual penalties.

 

[CobberRodgers]

Going to be fun watching the AFL justify both the non sanction for the tackle resulting in a HIA, and the HIA for a tackle that isn’t sanctioned.

 

[hdi]

Hw

The point Kingsley has made post match can't be ignored. We lost a valuable player in the last qtr over this because the AFL docs insisted on a concussion test.

How does this square with wieterring stumbling around last week like he was due an 8 count, with 15mins left still to go. How can AFL docs over rule in this one, but not the weitering one (which objectively looked much more severe)?

 

[Oscarman]

Sports entertainment era = no case to answer. Some random Giants player will get a week for something. Probably Lloyd as he is retiring

 

[Oscarman]

Hw

How does this square with wieterring stumbling around last week like he was due an 8 count, with 15mins left still to go. How can AFL docs over rule in this one, but not the weitering one (which objectively looked much more severe)?

HQ preferred winners v non preferred. Simples.