Apex36
Hall of Famer
- Mar 26, 2014
- 39,595
- 83,464
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Absolutely. Not arguing with that.Sorry Apex36 but you still go to the B&F don't you unless you are with your dad in Queensland?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Absolutely. Not arguing with that.Sorry Apex36 but you still go to the B&F don't you unless you are with your dad in Queensland?
ABSOFARKENLUTELY! Rockliff/Hanley maybe not. But Aish! Come on!Look I agree with the premise of the post, especially the delusional part which was well put.
I think we can stop placing Aish in the same sentence as Rockliff/ Hanley etc. He is no where near as good at present. Nor a guarantee to be so.
Pick 4 and Rockliff or Hanley would be overs in my opinion but Aish- please. He has shown his selection may not be a bust but that is it. No where near the other two.
Pick 4 and Aish is two guesses on the part of the Pies for a proven top echelon midfielder about to enter his prime. I accept that pick 4 and a proven, good to great player, in Rockliff/ Hanley is too much but a first year player (pick 4) and one about to enter his 2nd year(Aish) is not overs and more than fair.
If the Lions can't do that deal then all that they are trying to do is pull our pants down for a contracted player.
It's nothing different to what Brisbane are saying about only pick 4. It's a start point to commence negotiations. Both clubs know they will have to meet somewhere in between. I wouldn't read anything more into it than that.
You may be correct but I doubt whether either Beams or the club care much about the opinions of a few ill-informed BF posters.
Didn't consider that. Aish to the Crows for pick 9 sounds close. Picks 4 & 9 for Beams, is a fair deal, IMO, considering the draft depth.Or we can take brisbanes pick 4 and aish
On trade aish to adelaide for their picks 9 and 29
Trade 29 for greenwood
Gives us picks 4,8,9,22 (H), 28, greenwood.
Imagine how big a draft it would be if we got moore with pick 28.
BOYOHBOY WOWWEE
I thought so too but I would have needed a bit more amunition to hit him with before I replied. In the end my better judgement meant not engaging him, would have been pointless.That's one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.
What on earth would make you think it would have been put to him that way. If they said anything at all, (and I'm not saying they necessarily did) I'd imagine it would be nothing more than that he should consider his position given the likely fall out from some members. Strong enough to let him know that it could turn into a sideshow without the suggestion that he's not wanted.
ABSOFARKENLUTELY! Rockliff/Hanley maybe not. But Aish! Come on!
By the same token I think we'd have to be prepared to give up a Kennedy/Grundy/Broomhead though so it is harder than it sounds.
Beams is obviously not happy at the club. Is it because we moved on Shaw, he wasn't happy with the training loads, didn't like Bucks' approach to on and off field professionalism ? Who knows, but if these reasons are legitimate it really shows the true character of Beams rather than reflecting poorly on the coach/club etc.
Didn't consider that. Aish to the Crows for pick 9 sounds close. Picks 4 & 9 for Beams, is a fair deal, IMO, considering the draft depth.
If we're keen on Greenwood-
Lumumba & pick 29 for picks 22 & 34 (Clark trade)
Greenwood for 34.
Picks 4, 9 & 22 + Greenwood for Pick 29, Beams and Lumumba. I could live with that.
Look I agree with the premise of the post, especially the delusional part which was well put.
I think we can stop placing Aish in the same sentence as Rockliff/ Hanley etc. He is no where near as good at present. Nor a guarantee to be so.
Pick 4 and Rockliff or Hanley would be overs in my opinion but Aish- please. He has shown his selection may not be a bust but that is it. No where near the other two.
Pick 4 and Aish is two guesses on the part of the Pies for a proven top echelon midfielder about to enter his prime. I accept that pick 4 and a proven, good to great player, in Rockliff/ Hanley is too much but a first year player (pick 4) and one about to enter his 2nd year(Aish) is not overs and more than fair.
If the Lions can't do that deal then all that they are trying to do is pull our pants down for a contracted player.
You only think it's delusional because you hang out with people who want it to be delusional.
Look at it this way ..
Add Beams to Brisbane's 22; and take out one of Rockliff, Hanley or Aish, and take out the contribution pick 4 would have make ... And after all of that, would Brisbane be a better side than they are today? Of course they would be.
Now take Beams out of Collingwood's 22; then add one of , Hanley or Aish; add a pick 4 player ... And after all that, would Collingwood be a better side than they are today? Of course not! (Sure, there's a possibility they might be in 3 years when the young players develop)
If Brisbane can get Beams for pick 4 and one of Aish / Rockliff / Hanley; they should grab the deal and run like they stole it.
Didn't consider that. Aish to the Crows for pick 9 sounds close. Picks 4 & 9 for Beams, is a fair deal, IMO, considering the draft depth.
If we're keen on Greenwood-
Lumumba & pick 29 for picks 22 & 34 (Clark trade)
Greenwood for 34.
Picks 4, 9 & 22 + Greenwood for Pick 29, Beams and Lumumba. I could live with that.
Yeah except that can't happen coz u cannot on-trade a player! You can only on-trade a pick!
I believe it was an old post by Beams done a few weeks ago. It only came up again last night when a fan commented on it.NOTE on Beams non appearance at the BnF - Ed said he personally invited him, once Beams was named as 3rd place. Beams was being a smartarse posting the Instagram comment about being with H.Shaw, his best mate, on the night he should have been attending the BnF. It was a case of indicating " I'm not there because you got rid of my mate and look what I'm doing tonight instead". Very immature.
Didn't consider that. Aish to the Crows for pick 9 sounds close. Picks 4 & 9 for Beams, is a fair deal, IMO, considering the draft depth.
If we're keen on Greenwood-
Lumumba & pick 29 for picks 22 & 34 (Clark trade)
Greenwood for 34.
Picks 4, 9 & 22 + Greenwood for Pick 29, Beams and Lumumba. I could live with that.
Yeah except that can't happen coz u cannot on-trade a player! You can only on-trade a pick!
Just do a three way trade with Adelaide then. They give pick 9 to Brisbane who then on trade it to us along with their pick 4.
This needs to be posted as a thread title and stickied forever.Yeah except that can't happen coz u cannot on-trade a player! You can only on-trade a pick!
FiloBeddie, can this happen? I don't have the answer.This needs to be posted as a thread title and stickied forever.
Just do a three way trade with Adelaide then. They give pick 9 to Brisbane who then on trade it to us along with their pick 4.
Sounds ok I think. I reckon some thought that the It would be 4 and Aish to us and then we could deal with Adelaide separately. That can't happen.FiloBeddie, can this happen? I don't have the answer.
Aish to Crows for pick 9 to Brisbane.
Beams to Lions for picks 4 & 9.
I understand where you are coming from but what has transpired in the past 24 hours means simply that it is pick 4 and a worthwhile player or he plays for the Pies next year.My 2 cents as an opposition supporter. You don't have a strong hand - it's pick 4 now or nothing in 12 months. This is nothing you don't know. That's why he's only 'worth' pick 4. The way he's behaving I think he's more than happy to sit next year out...