Though I ultimately agree, I would say however that Dawes has significantly more room for improvement. It was only the middle of the year that Dawes started to feel relatively confident in the side. Had he played the whole season, he probably would have kicked around the same amount of goals as Cloke. I think he can improve quite a bit next season, while Cloke is relatively limited in where he goes from here. He's already one of the better contested marks in the league, works as hard as any CHF etc, and is highly unlikely to significantly improve his goal kicking as much as year after year Collingwood fans keep saying he will. He will always have an issue with his kicking just like Richo and others have.If this is serious then Cloke hands down. Dawes was simply insipid in the first GF, utterly horrible. Cloke on the other hand was good, would have been great if he kicked straight for goal, still on contribution he was there and there abouts as the best foward on the ground.
Dawes was a little bit better in the second GF and Cloke a little worse but it was hardly enough to bridge the gap between Cloke and Dawes in the first final.
As for the thread I have mentioned else where if Trav had any intention to go it would have been explored elsewhere before the draft, where they could have found him a more suitable home rather then play the lottery that will be the pre-season draft. As Zahki has mentioned I think David Cloke was asked and in an effort to push things along with a club made this comment / threat without fully understanding (or with full knowledge) of the drama it would create in a hope of getting a better deal from the club.
Dawes on the other hand has plenty of room for improvement given the physical domination he has proven in periods but not consistently he can impose upon defenders. As his confidence continues to rise he will start to use this more consistently.
I actually think Dawes will be our leading goal kicker for a number of years whether Cloke goes or stays.