Ha ha - you're hilarious Mitch. The House are younger than they were in 2009. I suppose we'll just have to see what happens on the paddock.
The Power House rumour file is just that - rumours. Some may be right. Some may be wrong. Wait and see
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
D3 Division 3 2011
- Thread starter Rooster1979
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Ha ha - you're hilarious Mitch. The House are younger than they were in 2009. I suppose we'll just have to see what happens on the paddock.
The Power House rumour file is just that - rumours. Some may be right. Some may be wrong. Wait and see
- Oct 7, 2002
- 16,172
- 16,873
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Hard to find time on a Saturday in that industry!
for Pike to play he would have to be cleared by VAFA first wouldn't he? Keep an eye out for transfers on the website. Brisbane Lions -> Powerhouse should stand out I reckon.
Also would mean as a player-coach VAFA would impose a limit on how much he could be paid. It's a measly limit too. Either he'd be forgoing his salary or Powerhouse would have to hope the amnesty got extended to 2011
Also would mean as a player-coach VAFA would impose a limit on how much he could be paid. It's a measly limit too. Either he'd be forgoing his salary or Powerhouse would have to hope the amnesty got extended to 2011
Mighty2Blues
Debutant
who's playing who in praccys this yr?
Crusader Rabbit
Draftee
Heard Prahran Assumption beat Assumption 1st Xv111 today!
Rooster1979
Team Captain
- Thread starter
- #158
Of course they would. As talented as Assumption 1st XVIII would be, I think all D3 sides would beat them. Body size and experience count for a lot in football. Assumption 2nd XVIII however would towel up some reserve sides.
i would beg to differ. i played for assumption 1st 18 when we played ivanhoe assumption many years ago and were able to defeat them quite well. I think Prahran Assumption may have a fair few good recruits
Agrre with Theflyer.
Assumption have fielded some teams capable of outstanding football for that age.
From memory, they beat us easily twice, once by a goal at kilmore's ground when we had a good side and they went through the year undefeated and we beat them comforatbly once.
It depends on the quality of the side Asssumption has of course, but I'd say that is a good sign for Prahran.
Assumption have fielded some teams capable of outstanding football for that age.
From memory, they beat us easily twice, once by a goal at kilmore's ground when we had a good side and they went through the year undefeated and we beat them comforatbly once.
It depends on the quality of the side Asssumption has of course, but I'd say that is a good sign for Prahran.
How many changes occur in Assumptions team each year compared to Prahran?
Rooster1979
Team Captain
- Thread starter
- #162
I agree the Assumption team will be good, especially in underage football. However, over a season, I'd have them pretty short for the wooden spoon in D3.
Also agree they will fluctuate in standard more wildly and quickly than senior clubs, but really, they are essentially a non elite U18 side?
Rooster1979
Team Captain
- Thread starter
- #163
I'd say Assumption average 22 changes a year to the starting lineup of 22.
nikko teen58
All Australian
Just got home from our first practice match for the year. We played Laverton Magpies at the glorious Whitten Oval. What a magnificent ground to get dumped on. Keenly contested even game. Biggest improver ----- The Puff Machine?
Could anyone tell me how much their club membership is this year? [$200 AT UHSVU].
LavertonMagpie
All Australian
Was a great game under trying lighting conditions
We had a great game and you guys had a lot of pace, some good targets and a good side all round. Thanks for the game and best wishes for the 2011 season. FYI our stats said you guys won 7.11 to 5.1 for the senior game and we won the reserves by 4 points. Cheers.
Crusader Rabbit
Draftee
They generally have between 5 and 10 tac cup players in their squads a year.
Who do?
league B&F - Glen Francis Ivanhoe. came home with a wet sail in 2010 and with a full pre-season behind him he will be very good. He is a big strong boy.
- Banned
- #172
To kick things off:
I'll have a go at a ladder
Prahran: with Assumption equals very good team
Powerhouse: if they keep what they got and add a couple, they will be hard to beat
Hawthorn: appeared to have picked up players from higher grades, should improve
Elsternwick: hard to position, looked to have picked up a few good players, but they can't afford to have lost any, somewhere between 4 - 6
UHS-VU: Who knows what students they can pluck, they could be anything 5-9
Yarra Valley: young team, just missed out on finals last year, good depth, should figure in finals this year, somewhere between 5-7
Albert Park: have an aging but good list, need to keep everyone from last year, depth was poor last year. Somewhere between 6 - 8
Monash took D4 by storm last year and must be respected. Somewhere between 6 - 9
Ivanhoe: my disappointing team from 2010, I thought they be red hot but were too up and down. Will cause teams trouble if they can all stay fit.
West Brunswick: A club with a lot a pride that can win tough games to avoid relegation. Good but not good enough to make finals. Somewhere between 7 - 10
Mt Lilydale: there is always one promoted team that struggles the next year. Have a huge home ground advantage but I don't think it will be enough. Going back down
Kew: Struggled last year (lucky/unlucky to get promoted as the 3rd team from D4) Losing Greg Bell is huge, will need a massive change in player personal to avoid the drop.
This is just my opinion not based on any facts whatsoever. Take with a grain of salt.
I'll have a go at a ladder
Prahran: with Assumption equals very good team
Powerhouse: if they keep what they got and add a couple, they will be hard to beat
Hawthorn: appeared to have picked up players from higher grades, should improve
Elsternwick: hard to position, looked to have picked up a few good players, but they can't afford to have lost any, somewhere between 4 - 6
UHS-VU: Who knows what students they can pluck, they could be anything 5-9
Yarra Valley: young team, just missed out on finals last year, good depth, should figure in finals this year, somewhere between 5-7
Albert Park: have an aging but good list, need to keep everyone from last year, depth was poor last year. Somewhere between 6 - 8
Monash took D4 by storm last year and must be respected. Somewhere between 6 - 9
Ivanhoe: my disappointing team from 2010, I thought they be red hot but were too up and down. Will cause teams trouble if they can all stay fit.
West Brunswick: A club with a lot a pride that can win tough games to avoid relegation. Good but not good enough to make finals. Somewhere between 7 - 10
Mt Lilydale: there is always one promoted team that struggles the next year. Have a huge home ground advantage but I don't think it will be enough. Going back down
Kew: Struggled last year (lucky/unlucky to get promoted as the 3rd team from D4) Losing Greg Bell is huge, will need a massive change in player personal to avoid the drop.
This is just my opinion not based on any facts whatsoever. Take with a grain of salt.
I can only comment on Ivanhoe, but I think we will be more consistant and less reliant on individuals this year, and in turn finish higher up the ladder.
having said that I couldn't name 1 opposition player nor know who has come and gone at other clubs so haven't a clue.
just watch our for Glen Francis.
having said that I couldn't name 1 opposition player nor know who has come and gone at other clubs so haven't a clue.
just watch our for Glen Francis.
- Status
