Dogs land a beauty in Ugle-Hagan - but can they keep him?

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Roos should just stay in his lane and offer his advice to the club he’s actually employed at who are on track for their first ever wooden spoon. Instead of the team who’s on top of the ladder.

Why do you think that?
 
Dogs are on top of the ladder while still having a lot of young talent and plenty of upside from guys like Jamarra, Weightman, Smith and Sam Darcy in a few months time 😎 Plus most of the sides key movers still have years left. Some bottom sides are more reliant on old players than the Dogs
Don’t sleep on Garcia.
 
He’s also a premiership coach and is most definitely not scared of Luke Beveridge apparently.

Won one flag 16 years ago, playing with the most boring game plan of all time with a bloated salary cap. Better roll out the red carpet for him to tell David Noble "stay the course Dave, you're doing super!"
 
Why do you think that?
Because Paul Roos career as a coach is barely over .500. And his career highlight at Melbourne was trading pick 2 in the 2013 draft that could have netted them Kelly or Bontempelli instead wanted to trade down so they could secure Dom Tyson and Christian Salem.
 
Because Paul Roos career as a coach is barely over .500. And his career highlight at Melbourne was trading pick 2 in the 2013 draft that could have netted them Kelly or Bontempelli instead wanted to trade down so they could secure Dom Tyson and Christian Salem.

Maybe Dom Tyson is why he came to North. How's he going Paul?
 
Because Paul Roos career as a coach is barely over .500. And his career highlight at Melbourne was trading pick 2 in the 2013 draft that could have netted them Kelly or Bontempelli instead wanted to trade down so they could secure Dom Tyson and Christian Salem.

You forgot Billings….








Oh yes, never mind. I will see myself out.
 
Because Paul Roos career as a coach is barely over .500. And his career highlight at Melbourne was trading pick 2 in the 2013 draft that could have netted them Kelly or Bontempelli instead wanted to trade down so they could secure Dom Tyson and Christian Salem.

I don't think this is very good evidence at all
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

If you can link me to another time its happened then I'll gladly admit its not odd.
Ok I'll have a look later on

Hey what about Eddie McGuire and James Brayshaw when they were on The Footy Show? Must have happened every week. Did Melbourne employ Gary Lyon, too? Or was he like an unpaid consulant?
 
Hey what about Eddie McGuire and James Brayshaw when they were on The Footy Show? Must have happened every week. Did Melbourne employ Gary Lyon, too? Or was he like an unpaid consulant?

They questioned players work habits and said they were in terrible form and shouldnt be selected this week? Once again happy to see it if you got it.

Funny thing is Bevo didn't even go that hard at him, all he said was our club knows what best for our players. Not sure what's so wrong about that "angle" from Bevo.
 
I don't think this is very good evidence at all
Haha I love that you’re defending him on the evidence of Jamarra’s first game. What have you got to say about the 3 games since then? Do you think that Jamarra shouldn’t currently be playing senior footy ?
 
None, including the Dogs. But many players picked in the past very early with picks given to them outside the normal draft order have been mediocre and their teams have failed to make an impression. And they were gifts that didn't involve losing other picks as compensation. The Dogs are very lucky to get Darcy and Ugle-Hagan, but nothing is guaranteed 🤷‍♂️
With the draft points match system, what picks did the Dogs pay solely to land JUH?
 
With the draft points match system, what picks did the Dogs pay solely to land JUH?
In total we had to stump up 2,400 points (3,000 minus 20% discount).
We got lucky that Collingwood helped us out with points as part of the Treloar deal. We traded picks back to meet the total.
 
In total we had to stump up 2,400 points (3,000 minus 20% discount).
We got lucky that Collingwood helped us out with points as part of the Treloar deal. We traded picks back to meet the total.

I don't understand the draft points thing and I refuse to learn. Is this what being a boomer is like? Feels kinda nice
 
With the draft points match system, what picks did the Dogs pay solely to land JUH?

It seems that the points for picks 29, 33, 41, 42, 52 and 54 were all needed.

We had traded in picks to cover it and then only had one further pick at 55 after all the shuffling caused by picks dropping out (including 6 of ours).
 
I don't understand the draft points thing and I refuse to learn. Is this what being a boomer is like? Feels kinda nice
I guess that's kind of like being a Boomer, but only if you own a bunch of stuff first
 
Does that include the draft rules where we reward teams for being terrible? Or do you only have problems with decent teams getting top draft picks that they give up almost of all their draft capital for?
Given the hit and miss rate of 2nd and 3rd round picks there's not a club in the land that wouldn't take pick 1 over the equivalent so-called draft points.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Dogs land a beauty in Ugle-Hagan - but can they keep him?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top