Autopsy Eagles v Blues - AFL Rd 23, 2024 - Sun August 18th 2:40 W / 4:40 E - (Optus Stadium)

[Forward Press]

There are entire Eagles game day threads this past two years that don't even reach triple digit posts, and this one will reach 100 two days before the game.

So given the media focus and pressure on Carlton...






Blues by 60+.

This dude, right here.

 

[CakeEater]

On what basis?

We've had less umpire assisted wins than you?

 

[Rob]

Harleys having a great time, laughing it up

 

[Asapartyhat]

On what basis?

Lol. On the basis that they tried really really hard and it's just not fair

 

[RAPPA]

Harleys having a great time, laughing it up

Hey played a few games in Carlton’s VFL team last year so not surprising he knows a few of the blokes

 

[The 747]

What is better, watching the Eagles or watching The Bounce?

 

[Antonio_RooLife]

What is better, watching the Eagles or watching The Bounce?

The Bounce is better than all of today's games

 

[WalshistheGOAT]

Hey played a few games in Carlton’s VFL team last year so not surprising he knows a few of the blokes

Was far less of a figjam in those games too. Seems the WA fame has gotten to his head a bit

 

[WalshistheGOAT]

The Bounce is better than all of today's games

Id rather drink a gallon of salt water than watch that junk

 

[Thrawn]

We've had less umpire assisted wins than you?

So none?

Ok then.

 

[Antonio_RooLife]

Blues must have just ended Pies season right?

 

[Byron_Clanger]

Well...add it to the file of all the other embarrassing performances from this club over the last three years. I don't even care if it's cucked Freo and Collingwood in the process. I can take losing, it's the games where they show one quarter of effort that pisses me off the most.

 

[Sarcoidevo]

Blues must have just ended Pies season right?

Yep Pies are out of Finals running

If Saints beat Blues next Sunday then ball is in Freo's court to beat Port

Last 2 games of the round

 

[Sarcoidevo]

On what basis?

On the basis that the Saints will beat you next Sunday and Freo will beat Port

 

[stallon]

There is no way Reid will stay at West Coast. Any player who looks that happy to be joking around after a 10 goal hamming doesn’t have their heart at the club.

Hes just a happy fella

 

[Stax on the mill]

Yep Pies are out of Finals running

If Saints beat Blues next Sunday then ball is in Freo's court to beat Port

Last 2 games of the round

Up to you mighty Sainters then.

 

[fnerd]

I did t deflect anything. I admitted I hated that thug hall.

You just mentioned gaff and his hit on that soft **** Brayshaw

So Andrew brayshaw is a soft campaigner for getting king hit as a teenager???

An act that if occurred in public would have likely seen gaff get jail time..

Ok then..

 

[Smotie2]

So Andrew brayshaw is a soft campaigner for getting king hit as a teenager???

An act that if occurred in public would have likely seen gaff likely get jail time..

Ok then..

He ducked and the video footage would've shown it in court
Any decent lawyer would've had it thrown out before trial.

 

[Smotie2]

We've had less umpire assisted wins than you?

You've got less umpire assisted premierships too lol

 

[Smotie2]

Do you have said lawyers number?

Might need it if ever find myself completely in the wrong and are looking to take no accountability for it

Take your Freo glasses off mate and watch it again.
When gaff swings his arm Brayshaw bends his knees and drops forward a as a result instead of gaff hiring his chest he hits his jaw.
All of gaffs previous football history proves his character and the fact this wasn't intentional. Unlike halls hit on stalker.

The lawyer would also argue about the strength of brayshaw jaw and have it examined by a medical professional.

 

[fnerd]

Take your Freo glasses off mate and watch it again.
When gaff swings his arm Brayshaw bends his knees and drops forward a as a result instead of gaff hiring his chest he hits his jaw.
All of gaffs previous football history proves his character and the fact this wasn't intentional. Unlike halls hit on stalker.

The lawyer would also argue about the strength of brayshaw jaw and have it examined by a medical professional.

Guess I’ll just have to defer on this one to your astounding legal mind then smootie

 

[My Cotchin Rules]

He ducked and the video footage would've shown it in court
Any decent lawyer would've had it thrown out before trial.

What a ridiculous response. Just because the victim reduced the damage from the king hit, by "ducking", does NOT mean it isn't assault, even if he intented to strike his chest! It's the intention behind it and Gaff intended to hit him. Would have been a plea from defence, well before even a contested mention!

 

[Smotie2]

What an uneducated response. Just because the victim reduced the damage from the king hit, by "ducking", does NOT mean it isn't assault, even if he intented to strike his chest! It's the intention behind it and Gaff intended to hit him. Would have been a plea from defence, well before even a contested mention!

I did t say he reduced the damage by ducking. I said he increased the damage by ducking. Gaff would've hit his chest otherwise and it would've been play on

 

[My Cotchin Rules]

I did t say he reduced the damage by ducking. I said he increased the damage by ducking. Gaff would've hit his chest otherwise and it would've been play on

It's still assault. He hit him. You said any good "lawyer" would get him off before a trial by reviewing the footage in court.
I can tell you now there is zero chance that gets anywhere near trial, let alone a contested mention. "Recklessly causing injury" is the conviction he would face in the real would. Defence would argue reckless instead of intention, which would get up with an early plea.

 

[CakeEater]

So none?

Ok then.

Um the one against us- where the umps missed a ball that was touched more than Dorotich's in Lygon Street that got paid a mark to gift you a goal in the last minute?