![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/collingwood.png)
- Moderator
- #1,251
Try 5 of there best
Hopefully they can make up those 79 points.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: GWS Giants v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 65% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Try 5 of there best
IMO WC at full strength are the only team that could complete with Marby, but I don't think even then they would beat them.Hopefully they can make up those 79 points.
IMO WC at full strength are the only team that could complete with Marby, but I don't think even then they would beat them.
These 6 by all accounts would be in WC best 22 who did not play Saturday - Omar Saad, Tom Drake, Abdi Fittax, Jona Horro, Blake Ross, Perry Petrakios, still a massive mountain to climb you would think, but not all lost given makeup of WC team will be very different if they face each other again this year.Was at the game yesterday
Marby way to good and smashed wc on every line
I also think holland is just to good of a coach aswell
Who were the big wc guns who didn’t play as I thought all these best players were out there
Relegation battle still on
Uptherox will Eliot play this week
Here is the Women's forumIs there a women's forum on big footy still? Noted that the preliminary final for women is being played at Buckley Park. That joint is an absolute cow paddock. Even in the summer it's not fit for cricket so no idea how it can be fit for a women's prelim final. We aren't serious about women's footy if we are sending them there to play.
On SM-S928B using BigFooty.com mobile app
These 6 by all accounts would be in WC best 22 who did not play Saturday - Omar Saad, Tom Drake, Abdi Fittax, Jona Horro, Blake Ross, Perry Petrakios, still a massive mountain to climb you would think, but not all lost given makeup of WC team will be very different if they face each other again this year.
Harsh on Rupo, lot of players lostMy ratings on all 11 teams this season
Marby A
WC A
Hillside A+
St Albans B
Oak Park A++
CB F
Tulla F
MV C+
Roxy C
Rupo F
KP F
What would you give them ?Harsh on Rupo, lot of players lost
But at least in div 2 they will get a decent profit when they play the kangas at their ground & vice versa - especially if there is a night match scheduled.What would you give them ?
D for getting relegated
Interested to see criteria on how Hillside is an A+ and the other top 4 sides are As and BsMy ratings on all 11 teams this season
Marby A
WC A
Hillside A+
St Albans B
Oak Park A++
CB F
Tulla F
MV C+
Roxy C
Rupo F
KP F
Interested to see criteria on how Hillside is an A+ and the other top 4 sides are As and Bs
Fair post.. St Albans paying out some coin as well but so do the other 2 in Marby and Hillside but they ended up top 3. Think it’s a fair call as club got value for there investment and ST Albans probably at the same level as last season but one would assume spending slightly more in 24 than 23.No criteria
Hillside have improved and give themselves a double chance
St A find themselves again playing a knock out final. Have they improved![]()
I like this debate:No criteria
Hillside have improved and give themselves a double chance
St A find themselves again playing a knock out final. Have they improvedNice concept.
I feel (and already know of a number)But at least in div 2 they will get a decent profit when they play the kangas at their ground & vice versa - especially if there is a night match scheduled.
Providing they hang on to majority of their group and add some they will be competitive in div 2.
On SM-G970F using BigFooty.com mobile app
West Coburg lol
Maybe trying to inject some cash into ES.Strange east Sunbury is hosting? I thought EDFL were all about the venues being gated.
On SM-G970F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Marby beat HS with 34 points, beat StA with 37 and beat WC with 39.I like this debate:
Marby A and average 40 points per game.
WC A and average 23 points per game.
On this basis there could be a discussion around ladder position versus resources / cash?
Marby beat HS with 34 points, beat StA with 37 and beat WC with 39.
Points doesn't always translate to $$$ and or talent. But if you have the resources, you'd be made not to use them.
Not saying Marby is an A+, IMO they are better than the rest by some margin.
$$$ help attract good players to any club. If every club was paying the cap how may of these good players would be at the top 5 clubs on reduced payments.Marby are the best side in it - they just need to perform in finals to prove that.
Points are irrelevant I think because part of being a good club is having the ability to recruit and attract good players to the club
I agree. Also I think they have gone the wrong way about it,. Yes they have recruited, but if they win GF ( which I don't think they can win ) and go up to A grade. Players such as Fort Caruso, Nat Caruso, Rob Costello, are all well past A Grade football. Then you have Jake Gatto, Alessio Gobbo, who both are not good enough to be A grade players. Then you could add their captain Prestia and 100 goal kicker Covelli, who I believe will both struggle in A gradeInterested to see criteria on how Hillside is an A+ and the other top 4 sides are As and Bs
For a relegated club they were actually in a pretty good space. Good depth and not a shit fight off field.Marby are the best side in it - they just need to perform in finals to prove that.
Points are irrelevant I think because part of being a good club is having the ability to recruit and attract good players to the club
Marby the only team who would compete in Prem. WC/Hillside would be bottom 2 or 3 quite easily.Hillside are in no position to go up to premier - the thing they do have going for them is decent numbers with thirds, fourths and strong U18’s coming through
Based on current senior playing lists Marby are best suited to go up, followed by West Coburg.