Faith's Merged Top 16's

Remove this Banner Ad

Sep 29, 2007
31,610
20,996
The Kop
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Socceroos-LFC-Crows-Adel.United
Everytime i hear some new info i'll update my top 16.
At this stage its as follows:

1 Melbourne J.Watts (I actually rate Nat 1 but Watts will go 1. Nats a freak never seen anything like him before)
2 West Coast N.Natanui
3 Fremantle S.Hill (Huge upside, put a few kg's on and will be a gun)
4 Port Adelaide T.Vickerry
5 Essendon D.Rich
6 Carlton M.Hurley
7 Brisbane J.Ziebell
8 Richmond S.Sidebottom (Picks 8-10 are tough Richmond will like someone like SideB)
9 North Melbourne S.McKernan (Ive been told he is a future star)
10 Adelaide H.Hartlett
11 Collingwood J.Lisle (Collingwood like this bloke)
12 Sydney L.Johnstone
13 St. Kilda C.Yarran (Needs to work harder, if he learns to will be 2nd best player from this draft after Nat)
14 Western Bulldogs A.Cordy
15 Geelong T.Swift (Geelong can afford to take this chance)
16 Hawthorn J.Trengove (I rate him in top 10, but have feeling he will slip)
 
Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

Everytime i hear some new info i'll update my top 16.
At this stage its as follows:

1 Melbourne J.Watts
2 West Coast N.Natanui
3 Fremantle S.Hill
4 Port Adelaide T.Vickerry
5 Essendon D.Rich
6 Carlton M.Hurley
7 Brisbane J.Ziebell
8 Richmond S.Sidebottom
9 North Melbourne S.McKernan
10 Adelaide H.Hartlett
11 Collingwood J.Lisle
12 Sydney L.Johnstone
13 St. Kilda C.Yarran
14 Western Bulldogs A.Cordy
15 Geelong T.Swift
16 Hawthorn J.Trengove

Interesting you have us take Lisle - I have Heard that we are Interested in him.

I would be Annoyed that we took him over Swift,Trengove and Blease but I would not Slit my Wrist
 
Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

If we pick Mckernan over Hartlett someone needs to get the sack

exactly what we dont need vs exactly what we need
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

I would take Lisle over these 3 blokes anyday of the week.
Out of Interest what is the Reason for that?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

Interesting you have us take Lisle - I have Heard that we are Interested in him.

I would be Annoyed that we took him over Swift,Trengove and Blease but I would not Slit my Wrist

Swift out for 2 years;
Trengrove knee and you have key forwards;
Blease too inconsistent;

Lisle hard running defender, which you dont have many of.
Can play up forward and through midf
 
Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

Did you put McKernan at 9 because his brother played for Nth?
 
Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

I wouldn't be unhappy passing on Rich but I am not sure Hill is the one for us

hope I am wrong
 
Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

Swift out for 2 years;
Trengrove knee and you have key forwards;
Blease too inconsistent;

Lisle hard running defender, which you dont have many of.
Can play up forward and through midf
Fair Enough on Swift and Trengove but Blease has Ton of Potental.

Did you reckon we get Lisle or have you heard something about that?
 
Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

Bias...

Your an Adelaide supporter and Hartlett just happens to fall to you?
We will not over look him. the word around is that we are very keen.
 
Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

Bias...

Your an Adelaide supporter and Hartlett just happens to fall to you?
We will not over look him. the word around is that we are very keen.

what is he going to gain from being bias on a phantom draft? he simply rates hartlett at that position, hes not choosing the real draft
 
Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

I'm not saying they gain anything, i'm saying her/his view is unrealistically scewed in thier favour,
 
Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

I would be ropeable if we took Isles there is only 4 in my mind we should even be looking at:

1-Sidebottom
2-Swift
3-Trengrove
4-Blease

In Regards to Swift and Trengrove:
Do we all forget so soon the lessons learned from over looking Judd and Selwood because of injury?

The fact is these kids are young, there bodies are growing and subsequently they are much more susecptible to injury, but they will come on and eveyone who over looked them will again ask themselves why?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

I would be ropeable if we took Isles there is only 4 in my mind we should even be looking at:

1-Sidebottom
2-Swift
3-Trengrove
4-Blease

In Regards to Swift and Trengrove:
Do we all forget so soon the lessons learned from over looking Judd and Selwood because of injury?

The fact is these kids are young, there bodies are growing and subsequently they are much more susecptible to injury, but they will come on and eveyone who over looked them will again ask themselves why?

Well Collingwood are definitely interested in him, but whether or not they'll take him with 11 is another matter.
 
Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

Well Collingwood are definitely interested in him, but whether or not they'll take him with 11 is another matter.
I know we are Intrested in Lisle but I just can't see him going at 11 but We are talking about Hine so can't 100% rule it out.

If someone how he is Fell to Pick 29 We would Defiantly Draft Him
 
Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

for the idiots saying they would be angry if the pies took lisle. Grow a freaking brain. I think a guy being paid to watch all these kids might have a better idea than you do. Infact you can pretty much expect that Hine will not go with the norm thats seen in phantoms, he barely ever does.
 
Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

for the idiots saying they would be angry if the pies took lisle. Grow a freaking brain. I think a guy being paid to watch all these kids might have a better idea than you do. Infact you can pretty much expect that Hine will not go with the norm thats seen in phantoms, he barely ever does.
I said I would not be Angry if we took Lisle but a Bit Annoyed but does not make me Right, It's Called having an Opinion and People have Different Opinions
 
Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

I said I would not be Angry if we took Lisle but a Bit Annoyed but does not make me Right, It's Called having an Opinion and People have Different Opinions

You probably would have been spitting chips in 2005 when the Pies took Pendlebury with pick 5... but that turned out ok.

Its very easy to let BigFooty and Youtube cloud your judgement, but club recruiters see these blokes play a lot more than we do.
 
Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

Very good and informed moch draft FAITH.

I think if Yarran slips past a couple of teams in the 10, that's where he'll slide.

I agree with you that Port would pass on Rich if he's there.

Good effort.

And to all the internet recruiters out there, stop going ape sh*t because someone has you taking someone other then the concencus BigFooty best.

Go over the last few BF mocks by random w***ers nd see how accurate they are, and how Gordis was a first round star last year.
 
Re: Faith's Top 16 As At 6/11/08.....

how much would you stake on that?

If the Dockers "skip" on Rich and he falls through to Essendon, you wil be as happy as we were when you passed on Palmer. Rich will be a gun, no doubts. Why take the risk on another interstate player when you have homegrown talent that won't leave! (Unless we go for Hill which will be like a JON pick)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Faith's Merged Top 16's

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top