The mean machine, I am pleased that I am not the only one that thinks he doesn't mark well,he would be one of the weakest in the fwd line. Makes me feel betterWhen the others mark, they grip that ball,like they should!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/the-lance-chance-20130601-2niyq.html
This is in tomorrow's Age, if you are interested in reading it.
Thank you jake Niall
Risky move to match the offer if its beyond us as Bud may turn around and say 'what the hell, I'll stay for 6 years at 1.5m'. Not that he's not worth it but we can't afford it.Niall is possibly the best writer in the game. No hyperbole - just facts, sense and damn good writing.
When it comes to compensation - if we matched a GWS offer that Buddy accepts and then force the trade - would GWS willingly part with a Whitfield/Cameron calibre of player and then a first rounder this year as well? We know that Sheeds has said he'd trade Skoda Stadium for Nic Nat - but come Round 23 (and possibly even now) Sheedy doesn't really have a say in the matter. Losing Buddy will be a bitter pill - but should we get Whitfield and pick 1/2 in the draft coming back then it softens the blow. If we get pick 16 only then it's all for nought.
Niall is possibly the best writer in the game. No hyperbole - just facts, sense and damn good writing.
When it comes to compensation - if we matched a GWS offer that Buddy accepts and then force the trade - would GWS willingly part with a Whitfield/Cameron calibre of player and then a first rounder this year as well? We know that Sheeds has said he'd trade Skoda Stadium for Nic Nat - but come Round 23 (and possibly even now) Sheedy doesn't really have a say in the matter. Losing Buddy will be a bitter pill - but should we get Whitfield and pick 1/2 in the draft coming back then it softens the blow. If we get pick 16 only then it's all for nought.
@ brown blood, tbh I haven't seen the other 1/2 dozen stories that you refer to and i'm sure they would be interesting to read but for mine the thing I liked most about this article was the closing - never has a truer word been spoken. As for who reads this "crap" - I did and enjoyed it and you obviously did to base your comment of lazy journalism.
When it comes to matching amounts in order to force a trade, i think the hawks should only have to match 80-90% of the amount, due to the extra allowance GWS has above a normal salary cap.That would really throw a spanner in the works for GWS if we match the offer and we request a trade!
You should learn the art of pretending, spud. It's worked for me for half a century.What nonsense! A woman is never wrong. Blokes are taught that at a very young age. And boy is it reinforced during a relationship!!!
H2F, Where did 3rd hand Barrett hear this news?It MUST have come from somewhere! GWS? AFL? Did Barrett just hear gossip, as usual I guess. He can't just make it up, surely..If that news isn't correct, he should be sued for his lies.
This is so true.When it comes to matching amounts in order to force a trade, i think the hawks should only have to match 80-90% of the amount, due to the extra allowance GWS has above a normal salary cap.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/the-lance-chance-20130601-2niyq.html
This is in tomorrow's Age, if you are interested in reading it.
Don't think so.Can we actually trade Buddy before the free-agency negotiations commence?
Haddo, I respect the opinions of most on here.. Especially if they have being around the BF traps longer than me.
Do you think at his age, (27 next year) that he would make the switch to a brand new sport??
That would be a very brave thing to do.
Can we actually trade Buddy before the free-agency negotiations commence?