Blackas87
Brownlow Medallist
Teams giving away free kicks is the reason. The free kick count doesn't have to be even.What are the reasons for this
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Teams giving away free kicks is the reason. The free kick count doesn't have to be even.What are the reasons for this
What??!?!?That also shows that the last 17 gf's have been played by clubs out of seperate states. Well done AFL.
Teams giving away free kicks is the reason. The free kick count doesn't have to be even.
The Selwoods and Danger alone would've had more than Adelaide.Free kick counts don't ever tell the whole picture, so the stats 46% (frees for non-Victorian side) to 54% (Victorian side) does not make it an obvious point. The main issue I have is the 50/50 calls can seriously go in favor of one side, and when it's an obvious free to the other side, it does not get paid or the umpire says "I didn't see it". This leads to a miscue of the stats.
Bias is a natural phenomena, there's nothing really wrong with it iif it's at a reasonable level. However, there are times it's obvious to any AFL fan that the game is clearly not umpired on a consistent level for both teams. In most cases if the team is clearly the better side, and if they're playing to a home crowd, then the probability is high that the free kick count will be in their favor (or in the least draw even). But in the Cats v Crows game, the Crows lost the free kick count 17 to 23.
I hope the umpires umpire in the spirit of the game this coming GF. Just let the better team win, that's all I ask!
Not really pre-emptive, OP is still sooking about 2016Gotta love a pre-emptive sook
Most of the difference is the 3 Sydney GFs. Dirty cheatsI just looked up the stats (of free kicks) of every Grand Final between a Victorian and non-Victorian team since 2000 and this is what I got
2001
Brisbane - 22
Essendon - 19
2002
Collingwood - 24
Brisbane - 16
2003
Brisbane - 13
Collingwood - 18
2007
Geelong - 28
Port Adelaide - 25
2012
Sydney - 10
Hawthorn - 21
2013
Hawthorn - 14
Fremantle - 13
2014
Sydney - 18
Hawthorn - 18
2015
Hawthorn - 14
West Coast - 13
2016
Sydney - 8
Western Bulldogs - 20
So that is
Non-Victorian - 138 free kicks
Victorian - 162 free kicks
Or
Non-Victorian - 46% of free kicks
Victorian - 54% of free kicks
It also means of the 9 Grand Finals with Victorian and Non-Victorian teams playing since 2000, the Victorian team have won 7 of them (free kick wise), the non-Victorian team has won it once and there was one draw.
What are the reasons for this, and could this be a problem for Adelaide next week?
Brisbane 2002/03 were far more physical sides than Collingwood so no surprise to see they also conceded more free kicks in those games.
Yep, so many missed HTB decisions not paid against Buddy and Kennedy. It's as though the rule didn't exist for these two.Been fine except for last years debacle
Lol 2016I just looked up the stats (of free kicks) of every Grand Final between a Victorian and non-Victorian team since 2000 and this is what I got
2001
Brisbane - 22
Essendon - 19
2002
Collingwood - 24
Brisbane - 16
2003
Brisbane - 13
Collingwood - 18
2007
Geelong - 28
Port Adelaide - 25
2012
Sydney - 10
Hawthorn - 21
2013
Hawthorn - 14
Fremantle - 13
2014
Sydney - 18
Hawthorn - 18
2015
Hawthorn - 14
West Coast - 13
2016
Sydney - 8
Western Bulldogs - 20
So that is
Non-Victorian - 138 free kicks
Victorian - 162 free kicks
Or
Non-Victorian - 46% of free kicks
Victorian - 54% of free kicks
It also means of the 9 Grand Finals with Victorian and Non-Victorian teams playing since 2000, the Victorian team have won 7 of them (free kick wise), the non-Victorian team has won it once and there was one draw.
What are the reasons for this, and could this be a problem for Adelaide next week?
He's making that thread by Wednesday, be patient.
And on Thursday I look forward to his thread about the Swans getting an extra days break despite Hawthorn finishing on top in 2012 after the Preliminary Final.
Give the kid time and a break, he's just having fun on school holidays.
I just looked up the stats (of free kicks) of every Grand Final between a Victorian and non-Victorian team since 2000 and this is what I got
2001
Brisbane - 22
Essendon - 19
2002
Collingwood - 24
Brisbane - 16
2003
Brisbane - 13
Collingwood - 18
2007
Geelong - 28
Port Adelaide - 25
2012
Sydney - 10
Hawthorn - 21
2013
Hawthorn - 14
Fremantle - 13
2014
Sydney - 18
Hawthorn - 18
2015
Hawthorn - 14
West Coast - 13
2016
Sydney - 8
Western Bulldogs - 20
So that is
Non-Victorian - 138 free kicks
Victorian - 162 free kicks
Or
Non-Victorian - 46% of free kicks
Victorian - 54% of free kicks
It also means of the 9 Grand Finals with Victorian and Non-Victorian teams playing since 2000, the Victorian team have won 7 of them (free kick wise), the non-Victorian team has won it once and there was one draw.
What are the reasons for this, and could this be a problem for Adelaide next week?
Not sure of the 1st 2 but the Port Hawks game you got to get over mate. In the last 3 minutes Port receive 2 very soft frees. The first is to number 47 (sorry I don't know who that is) Has his back to the play stopping Spangher going to the ball but gets the free! Then the Polec free against Roughead. Wow! Close to the perfect tackle but yep a bit of in the back. Minute late Ebert marks, plays on kick smothered by Hodge. As they turn Ebert clearly holds Hodge - play on! Jonas dives in Stratton tackles with Hodge assistance. Hodge gets the free when it should have been Stratton. Very harsh but certainly equivalent on technicality to the two previously mentioned Port frees. Last 10 seconds ball kicked to Ports 50, Monfries holding Lake's arm - play on. Lake falls on it and holds it in. That's it! Time to cut the mythology, face the facts and realise it was 3-9 in the first quarter and 13-16 overall as to why they lost and nothing to do with umpiring.(Hawks v Pies, Adelaide v Hawks, Port v Hawks).
There have been 3 PF's in the last 10 years that have been decided by less than a goal where the loser was absolutely crushed by the umpires in the final quarter (Hawks v Pies, Adelaide v Hawks, Port v Hawks).
Not much in it really. Only glaring exception being 2016.
You know the umpires got the Bulldogs over the line in 2016 because without the assistance this year they were back to the mediocrity they belong in.
Last night's game wasn't that bad in terms of umpiring I think, the soft Dusty shirt grab aside. Tigers deserve the grand final spot.
Last year's prelim involving GWS, a different story.
Without a doubt should be precisely 50% each, with absolutely no exceptions. Obviously this is corruption by the VFL...
You need to send this damning evidence to the authorities immediately. If you need help drafting up an email give me a PM.