Nah
Thank you, I also agree that I add a lot of value.
I don't agree with you that the structure was the same (won't sit here trying to argue my point though)... however I fully agree with you that intensity and execution were the biggest factors in the change of performance. In particular, when we were attacking but forced out onto the wings, we looked for (and found) options to bring it across into the corridor instead of kicking to a contest along the boundary line. Higher risk, but look where it got us. Tackling intensity and pressure really stepped up too.
And as much as I don't like to point fingers, Dawson and Pearce being out helped us immensely too, massive change in mindset and we could actually get some decent running play from the backline all the way to our forward 50.
So you joined the forum to tell me I'm wrong and then won't mount a rational argument!?
What you are describing is decision making which falls firmly in the land of execution!