No Oppo Supporters General AFL Discussion #11 - Carlton Posters ONLY!

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Drugs in footy: testing for all

In 2012, then Collingwood, now Melbourne CEO Gary Pert said drug use among footballers was “volcanic”, the game’s biggest issue. This week’s twist was a third-hand claim that footballers were using mental health - now that it has been thankfully de-stigmatised - as a cover to avoid drug testing. Sixteen at one club, apparently, and it wasn’t the Blues.
 
Too right, doesn't bother me at all. He's entitled to give his new fan base something to smile about. It's even part of his job, really. When his playing career finishes, Bryce will always be more of a Blue than a Crow.
He's putting a positive spin on a mediocre year for his fans, something he's accustomed to unfortunately. And I don't think people should harbour by him pointing out the obvious if enjoying more wins.

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

and with nothing short of a pathetic whimper, this:

'Hands in the back' rule gone
The hands in the back rule interpretation is to be repealed, allowing a player to place his hands on the back of his opponent to protect his position in a marking contest – but not to push the player in the back.
Our take on the rule
The hands in the back rule had been in place for more than a decade but never proven particularly popular with players or fans because of the seemingly incidental contact that it penalised. Perhaps the most famous instance of the rule drawing ire came in 2007 when Richmond star Matthew Richardson was penalised in a moment that arguably cost the Tigers a close game against Essendon.
 
and with nothing short of a pathetic whimper, this:

'Hands in the back' rule gone
The hands in the back rule interpretation is to be repealed, allowing a player to place his hands on the back of his opponent to protect his position in a marking contest – but not to push the player in the back.
Our take on the rule
The hands in the back rule had been in place for more than a decade but never proven particularly popular with players or fans because of the seemingly incidental contact that it penalised. Perhaps the most famous instance of the rule drawing ire came in 2007 when Richmond star Matthew Richardson was penalised in a moment that arguably cost the Tigers a close game against Essendon.
Been in for a decade...never proven popular so now repealed :oops:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top