Not just computers Arr0w.That's one thing a computer can't do, feel for the game
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Not just computers Arr0w.That's one thing a computer can't do, feel for the game
ClearlyNot just computers Arr0w.
Some live by CD stats.
Amazing the amount of times I have seen someone quote CD stats.
In 2012, then Collingwood, now Melbourne CEO Gary Pert said drug use among footballers was “volcanic”, the game’s biggest issue. This week’s twist was a third-hand claim that footballers were using mental health - now that it has been thankfully de-stigmatised - as a cover to avoid drug testing. Sixteen at one club, apparently, and it wasn’t the Blues.
antithesis of Blues = ?is he having a laugh equating mental health issues with our status as a basketcase?
If you see someone doing this you know straight away that any discussion with them would be pointless as they just don't get it.Some live by CD stats.
Amazing the amount of times I have seen someone quote CD stats.
He's putting a positive spin on a mediocre year for his fans, something he's accustomed to unfortunately. And I don't think people should harbour by him pointing out the obvious if enjoying more wins.Too right, doesn't bother me at all. He's entitled to give his new fan base something to smile about. It's even part of his job, really. When his playing career finishes, Bryce will always be more of a Blue than a Crow.
That's a confusing mention of us in the quoted text ... poor attempt at humour by the author ?
papers - that's funny.....Let’s just mention Carlton in every news article. We just sell papers.
just thinking, Aphrodite and less relevant mods, it it worth a temporary thread on the rule changes? here is an explanatory article that I have just seen - might be worth having a dedicated whinge thread for a couple of weeks for these latest batch of "interpretations"........
More flow, less clutter: who will benefit from new AFL rules
Been in for a decade...never proven popular so now repealedand with nothing short of a pathetic whimper, this:
'Hands in the back' rule gone
The hands in the back rule interpretation is to be repealed, allowing a player to place his hands on the back of his opponent to protect his position in a marking contest – but not to push the player in the back.
Our take on the rule
The hands in the back rule had been in place for more than a decade but never proven particularly popular with players or fans because of the seemingly incidental contact that it penalised. Perhaps the most famous instance of the rule drawing ire came in 2007 when Richmond star Matthew Richardson was penalised in a moment that arguably cost the Tigers a close game against Essendon.
can I ask why we have aflx, banter & practice match threads on our main carlton page but no general aflw discussion thread?