Rumour GFC 2019 Player Trading, Drafting FA, Rumours and Wish lists.

[foxdog50]

Papley will probably go for a top 10 pick as well. Meanwhile Kelly is looking at 2nd rounders and Petrucelle.

Surely it can't be.... I think we will get unders for TK.
It be 2019 & 2020 1st round picks which be picks in mid teens.

 

[Baudolino]

I'd move Danger to a half back flank

I think Danger forward is too hungry and his goal kicking isn't good enough, I'd like to see him bursting out of the back line and hitting up the mids.

This is genuinely one of the worst takes I have ever read. And that's saying a lot.

 

[rocker_oz33]

Smith originally cost us picks 49 & 53

We'd be lucky to get back a pick in the 50s this time right?

Thats like buying a car.
Like one of those project type's and working on it for years then not getting finshed.

Then saying stuff l'll sell at a loss .

 

[catman2006]

Smith originally cost us picks 49 & 53

We'd be lucky to get back a pick in the 50s this time right?

We get anywhere near pick 50 for Smith we win trade week

 

[winty]

Had a quick squizz on the Suns board to see if they had any insight about Smith possibly moving back north, and nearly fell off my seat laughing when I saw they had a thread on their board asking if they should merge with Southport Sharks.

 

[cats_09]

This is genuinely one of the worst takes I have ever read. And that's saying a lot.

Can you imagine his defensive accountability or lack there of - he's a see ball, get ball type player and not sure we'd get the best from him in defence

 

[thecatattack]

I'd move Danger to a half back flank. Dont want 30 year olds in the midfield.

So you wanna move our best midfielder, out of the midfield the season after he came 2nd in the Brownlow, due to an arbitrary age cutoff?

 

[David the Cat]

Danger to a half back flank......that takes the cake

Whoever supports that needs to give it away.....really....no clue!

 

[James1970]

Can you imagine his defensive accountability or lack there of - he's a see ball, get ball type player and not sure we'd get the best from him in defence

The only way it would work is if Danger, running off half back, never stopped until he was 25 out, then gave off a handball.

 

[rocker_oz33]

Did someone say cake.


Mmmmmmm cake.

 

[rocker_oz33]

Crows have already lose CEY and Greenwood.

Jenkins gone but no home yet.
Eddie big pants Betts on the move.

Thats 4 out of their best 22/24.

 

[Two Planks]

Crows don't want pick 1, they really want Lukoscius.

Crouch, Greenwood and pick 4
For
Lukoscius and pick 15

 

[cynical]

I agree about Sam doubt we could give him away if we wanted too, happy for Narkle in the mid but only 1 of Parfitt or Constable not both mid would still be slow...

True they are both slow but we need to develop a new midfield and that's what we currently have.

Would like to see which one if any can be a consistently good onballer, we really need to draft some quality mids but its hard with late first rounders.

 

[catman2006]

Crows have already lose CEY and Greenwood.

Jenkins gone but no home yet.
Eddie big pants Betts on the move.

Thats 4 out of their best 22/24.

Just shows how average crows were they could lose 6-7 players and be better off

 

[bulletproof]

Danger to a half back flank......that takes the cake

Whoever supports that needs to give it away.....really....no clue!

Well he got one thing right, he would be a good half back flanker...

 

[rocker_oz33]

Just shows how average crows were they could lose 6-7 players and be better off

True that.

 

[CatRiot]

Shame we don't have a Round 4 draft selection, as we could've sent that with Z Smith, for a Round 3 selection.

I am unsure if Pick 90 + Z Smith will give us a Pick in the 50s. Probably not.

 

[Commando]

Few have mentioned shopping Menegola

It this because he’s FA after next year?

I actually think he’s a decent player just had an injury interrupted season

 

[Max Milburn]

Danger to a half back flank......that takes the cake

Whoever supports that needs to give it away.....really....no clue!

We obviously came far too close to making the GF for someone's liking.

 

[CatRiot]

If Liam Ryan was drafted with Pick 26, its a fair chance that Sokol will go inside Top 35 btw.
Which means if we want a mid-sized natural goal kicker in Taheny or Sokol, we may need to pull the trigger early. Sokol under Pick 30, Taheny under Pick 24.
Crows for sure will be sniffiing with Pick 23 or 28 for Taheny, as they will probably trade out Jenkins and Betts.

 

[cynical]

Danger to a half back flank......that takes the cake

Whoever supports that needs to give it away.....really....no clue!

Easy to be critical when you never offer anything.

Danger lasted half a game against Richmond.

He is an aging player, he is a one way runner in the midfield with poor skills.

Look at Dusty he played mostly forward in the GF.

Danger isn't a good forward though he competes for everything, (even if Hawkins and Sav are competing) and his goal kicking is poor.

As a backman if he goes hard at the ball that is fine, he can provide explosive run from defence. I think it is certainly worth trying.

As for those who say he cant defend, not all defenders need to defend. Most teams have some offensive defenders. Don't think Danger would get bodied by small/med forwards.

We can leave him in the middle and stifle the development of our younger mids and finish there abouts again. Or we can move him forward and have it be the Danger show at the expense of everyone else.

 

[CatRiot]

Total BS that Suns got a Priority pick in draft...

 

[Baudolino]

Easy to be critical when you never offer anything.

Danger lasted half a game against Richmond.

He is an aging player, he is a one way runner in the midfield with poor skills.

Look at Dusty he played mostly forward in the GF.

Danger isn't a good forward though he competes for everything, (even if Hawkins and Sav are competing) and his goal kicking is poor.

As a backman if he goes hard at the ball that is fine, he can provide explosive run from defence. I think it is certainly worth trying.

As for those who say he cant defend, not all defenders need to defend. Most teams have some offensive defenders. Don't think Danger would get bodied by small/med forwards.

We can leave him in the middle and stifle the development of our younger mids and finish there abouts again. Or we can move him forward and have it be the Danger show at the expense of everyone else.

 

[Shadow89]

Easy to be critical when you never offer anything.

Danger lasted half a game against Richmond.

He is an aging player, he is a one way runner in the midfield with poor skills.

Look at Dusty he played mostly forward in the GF.

Danger isn't a good forward though he competes for everything, (even if Hawkins and Sav are competing) and his goal kicking is poor.

As a backman if he goes hard at the ball that is fine, he can provide explosive run from defence. I think it is certainly worth trying.

As for those who say he cant defend, not all defenders need to defend. Most teams have some offensive defenders. Don't think Danger would get bodied by small/med forwards.

We can leave him in the middle and stifle the development of our younger mids and finish there abouts again. Or we can move him forward and have it be the Danger show at the expense of everyone else.

You should be looking at a ban for posting something this stupid. Forwards would kick goals at will with Danger in defence. He can't even defend in the middle, what makes you think he'll be able to defend 40 metres closer to goal, where he's even more exposed?

Absolutely ridiculous.

 

[dazbroncos]

it must be school holidays again....

Some of the grade 3 ideas on here are spectacular..

GO CAtters