Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
Reckon both Ceglar or Neale could fill in down back as well as Sav.
Ceglar no too slow (and 32 anyway).
Neale needs to be developed as hawks long term replacement.
We need to rookie a kpd.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Reckon both Ceglar or Neale could fill in down back as well as Sav.
Pure_Ownage worst case scenario we put blitz back and have Stanley and Ceglar in the ruck.
Grundy is 28, is owed (approx.) a million a year for the next 5 years, has a recent history of breaking down and Collingwood are paying $300k for suitors to take him off their hands.LOL Collingwood supposedly happy to take pick 27 for Grundy, but don't want pick 25 for Henry. Idiots.
Assuming we do 33 plus 25 for Henry…
So 2 x second rounders, 2 x third rounders and esava for Henry?
Hmmm why though? That’s not good at all.
Is it a lie if he didn't know what the truth was to begin with?
Have a feeling we will target Busslinger with 7.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reckon both Ceglar or Neale could fill in down back as well as Sav.
Assuming we do 33 plus 25 for Henry…
So 2 x second rounders, 2 x third rounders and esava for Henry?
Hmmm why though? That’s not good at all.
2023 Draft has a few underage superstars that would go early this year
Harley Reid and Ashton Moir
No chance as nice in hellHave a feeling we will target Busslinger with 7.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't think we were put through the ringer.
But Collingwood certainly managed to gently bend us over in the "brace" position and offer very little in the way of lubricant. I think Mackie is just strategically returning the favour.
I don’t understand why we would have dealt for #25 unless we had a commitment from Collingwood that it would be part of a deal for Henry. It seemed like a terrible deal on face value unless we had a specific purpose for #25.
I'm dumbfounded. As soon as it happened all I thought was that there was obviously a plan for that pick. If it was purely a gamble and pays off before Wednesday, then I like Mackie's big balls.I don’t understand why we would have dealt for #25 unless we had a commitment from Collingwood that it would be part of a deal for Henry. It seemed like a terrible deal on face value unless we had a specific purpose for #25.
As a few others have said, it may already be done. They need something for their Wednesday night show.I don’t understand why we would have dealt for #25 unless we had a commitment from Collingwood that it would be part of a deal for Henry. It seemed like a terrible deal on face value unless we had a specific purpose for #25.
Deledio didn't have a brother playing for us.
Or just draft him with pick 25.Furthest I’d go for Henry is 25 + 33 for Henry+ 41.
Effectively it’s:
Henry + 41 for Esava +38 + 48 + 55 + FR2 (32ish) + FR4 (60ish)
Hmmmm. It’s already a lot.
I’d walk away if that isn’t agreed.
Does this work?
Pies
IN: 25+33
OUT: Henry + 50
Port
IN: Sav + 64
OUT: 33
Cats
IN: Henry + 50
OUT: 25 + 64
???
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
As a few others have said, it may already be done. They need something for their Wednesday night show.
Could live with it.
Yeah it’s hardly Jeremy Cameron after the clock ticks over is itCrocmedia must be spewing that the Horne Francis and Jackson deals have already dropped.
Bowes, Dunkley and Grundy tomorrow…. Means everyone’s hanging out for the cliffhangers of Rory Lobb and Ollie Henry during the live TV coverage on Wednesday night