Rumour GFC 2024 Player Trading, Drafting FA, Rumours and Wish lists Pt 2

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ask and we'll try our best to assist - so here's 2024 Provisional AFL Draft Order

As normal, would like to acknowledge & thank Lore for creating this, keeping it up to date and making it available for all users on BF to use and keep track of the picks ahead of the upcoming draft





I'll also sticky this post to ensure it's easily accessible for discussion of our hypothetical trader


Also,

2024 Free Agency Period

The AFL introduced free agency at the end of the 2012 season, giving players another vehicle where they can transfer from one club to another. Free agency is a common form of player movement in major football and sporting codes around the world.

Free Agency Opens: Friday October 4 at 9.00am
Free Agency Closes: Friday October 11 at 5.00pm


Continental Tyres AFL Trade Period

Trade Period Opens: Monday October 7 at 9.00am
Trade Period Closes: Wednesday October 16 at 7.30pm
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Heard today from 2 separate sources that no club will go near smith as he's not well so to speak. Dogs will have to throw in plenty to offload him it seems
He's OOC.

There's nothing holding him there, and there's no incentive for the Dogs to have to give something up to get him off their books.

If the Dogs think he's more trouble than he's worth then they don't have to do anything. They could just cut him, and hopefully get him the help he needs and put footy on hold.

Are you sure you're not thinking of Oliver?
 
Heard today from 2 separate sources that no club will go near smith as he's not well so to speak. Dogs will have to throw in plenty to offload him it seems

If that’s the case, Cats will be doing what they did with Mitch Clark, Jack Steven and Tyson Stengle.
Bet on culture and club outreach to help get these guys mentally back to a good place.

I’d imagine getting Baz away from the Melbourne bubble would help immensely.
Sometimes you just need a change of scenery or a change up in your life to make it all click.

Does it always work? No and you’d be naive to think it always will.

But I back our guys to wrap their arms around blokes and bring the best out of them.
We’ve done it with plenty of troubled or complicated blokes in the past.

Don’t be surprised if Bailey gets the same help from Hocko, Craig Drummond, the coaching crew and the lads.
Can see Jezza mentoring him
 

Log in to remove this ad.

He's OOC.

There's nothing holding him there, and there's no incentive for the Dogs to have to give something up to get him off their books.

If the Dogs think he's more trouble than he's worth then they don't have to do anything. They could just cut him, and hopefully get him the help he needs and put footy on hold.

Are you sure you're not thinking of Oliver?
Nah I reckon they know who they're talking about.

I think there seem to be a couple of significant differences to Oliver's situation
 
I can see the first sentence being on the money and the second sentence a misinterpreted comment
I can't. I reckon that info would be out if true by now.

If it is true though and for whatever reason the press never mentions it... then we will get confirmation with the trade deal and how little we/or whoever he goes to give for him.
 
Nah I reckon they know who they're talking about.

I think there seem to be a couple of significant differences to Oliver's situation
If they know who they're talking about then it doesn't make sense...

The Dogs haven't got any commitment to Smith. There's no reason for them to attach anything to the deal to get rid of him, they can just just cut him and nothing happens.

OP is suggesting a Bowes esque deal where the Dogs have to provide something to get opposition clubs to do the deal. It makes zero sense from a Dogs POV, Smith isn't contracted.

It would be like us doing this:

"Hey guys, here's James Willis and a first round pick. We were going to delist him anyway, but we just thought we'd be charitable for the sake of it"

I suggested they might be thinking of Oliver because that at least checks out.

The Dees would need to offer an incentive to get a club to take Oliver onboard, that's not the case with Smith.
 
Chris Scott gave a pretty good indication today in his press conference re Duncan and Rohan.

Stopped short of saying both would 100% be there next season, but seemed to indicate that contracts had been put in front of both. Rohan (when fit) has some assets (when fit) and still has his leg speed and marking for his size. And can impact games. Duncan I fear is cooked and might fall into the category of "I played on one year too many" if we assess this time next year.

If Duncan is best 22 next season I think we have problems.
Rohan was told last year this would be his last. Too get a extra year is a bonus for him, but as he has kept his speed I can see why.
 
I’ve heard the exact opposite.
He only played on this year to help the club transition to Conway, he was gonna finish up last year.
Yep he was going to Retire. The club really twisted his arm to play on.
And he has limped through.
hopefully he can get on a strong run from now on.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Comes back to what would you prefer?

The experience, on and off-field coaching, and spasmodic brilliance of Mitch Duncan?

...Or pick 78 in the draft? Keep in mind we'll already be taking several picks just before then.

It's chalk and cheese. If we've got a Dempsey or Humphries stashed away then we'll find them regardless, we don't need the list spot and the token pick in expense of Duncan.

Finding the next Jake Tarca and giving him a two year deal over the one year deal that Duncan will command makes zero sense.
Seems to me like we can turn pick 78 into a winner though
 
I would look at Max King. Has confidence issues atm but he's always been at a crap club. Has the capability.
 
Talk about this draft being deep and even from 5 - 30.

Is Smith worth the squeeze if the Dogs push too hard?

Dont want to give up too much for him. Not saying he has no value nor we should only give massive unders but Rd1 and Rd2 this year seems overs...

Rd1 and FR3 maybe but Rd1 this year is the starting place.

And anything FR1 or FR2 must be maintained.

With Tassie coming and the Tuggers gutting and reloading the picking will be slim in future years.

Lots to consider especially with the AFL and their academy darlings just getting kissed on the dick year on year now with picks and concessions still.

GO Catters
 
Talk about this draft being deep and even from 5 - 30.

Is Smith worth the squeeze if the Dogs push too hard?

Dont want to give up too much for him. Not saying he has no value nor we should only give massive unders but Rd1 and Rd2 this year seems overs...

Rd1 and FR3 maybe but Rd1 this year is the starting place.

And anything FR1 or FR2 must be maintained.

With Tassie coming and the Tuggers gutting and reloading the picking will be slim in future years.

Lots to consider especially with the AFL and their academy darlings just getting kissed on the dick year on year now with picks and concessions still.

GO Catters
I think the dogs are moving past him at a rate of knots and I don't think they'll feel hard done by when he is traded out.

That said I think the real midfield talent in this year looks top 10 and I wouldn't take anything at our pick over baz.
 
I would look at Max King. Has confidence issues atm but he's always been at a crap club. Has the capability.
Yeah Nah... Another SuperHypedSpud.
Very little footy nous and forward craft, less than his brother who is just BOG average in my opinion.
Rory Lobb has them(King Bros) covered and thats not saying much TBH.
 
Talk about this draft being deep and even from 5 - 30.

Is Smith worth the squeeze if the Dogs push too hard?

Dont want to give up too much for him. Not saying he has no value nor we should only give massive unders but Rd1 and Rd2 this year seems overs...

Rd1 and FR3 maybe but Rd1 this year is the starting place.

And anything FR1 or FR2 must be maintained.

With Tassie coming and the Tuggers gutting and reloading the picking will be slim in future years.

Lots to consider especially with the AFL and their academy darlings just getting kissed on the dick year on year now with picks and concessions still.

GO Catters
Perfect scenario to use a Future 1st.
A nice pick in the teens(15-19) this year would be kinda nice with plenty of quality players available this year IMO.
 
Yeah Nah... Another SuperHypedSpud.
Very little footy nous and forward craft, less than his brother who is just BOG average in my opinion.
Rory Lobb has them(King Bros) covered and thats not saying much TBH.
Would caveat by saying Ben looks pretty good. 3rd in the Coleman in a side that didn't make the 8
 
Prob with FR1 next year tku really think we’ll be this high again?

Don’t wanna give FR1 for Baz and give away pick 8-11
next year

Go Catters
 
Last edited:
Yeah Nah... Another SuperHypedSpud.
Very little footy nous and forward craft, less than his brother who is just BOG average in my opinion.
Rory Lobb has them(King Bros) covered and thats not saying much TBH.
This is a very poor take. He went from 22 goals in 2020, 38 goals in 2021 and then 52 goals in 2022. Was clearly on the way up before struck by injury. Someone with very little footy nous doesn't kick 52 goals in a year.

You can argue he is not a good list fit or injury prone etc but he clearly has a high level of talent which St Kilda is struggling to get enough out of him. We would struggle to get a player of his talent in the top 10 of any draft
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top