- Aug 30, 2021
- 19,471
- 38,624
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Shouldn’t you be posting on the Collingwood board?The perfect cover
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shouldn’t you be posting on the Collingwood board?The perfect cover
They don't even post positively about the club.Maybe there are no Crow fans here?
Clearly the negative types hate the club, that's why they bag it at every opportunity.
And the positive types couldn't seriously be happy about the anti-dynasty we're dishing up. Maybe they're "positive" in the same way Port haters are positive that Ken is awesome and will definitely lead Port Powers to premiership glory, he just needs another 10 years or so
And on cue, you attack someone who provides a balanced account (imho) of the latest positives and negatives of the club.Oh Jack,
If you wanted a new reputation and start, maybe lay off the tired old tropes?
We didn’t play on the weekendThis thread:
Cheer up you sad sacks. We actually WON on the weekend if you didn't notice
View attachment 1983266
Kirky
You can if you look at the year posters have joined.I cannot believe there are people genuinely over 12 years old in this thread.
Interesting comment coming from someone who has spent days agitating about the quality of posting and moderating on this board.
I'm sorry that you don't like it, but the mods are not the opinion police. Posts aren't going to be deleted because they are too negative or because you specifically don't like them.
This board has many negative opinions of the club because the club has not won a premiership in 25 years. That is the root of it. Not a moderation conspiracy.
It's also ironic that complaining about the standard of the board feeds into itself. Getting upset about someone else's opinion so you feel the need to call them out personally, rather than addressing the actual content they've posted, is trash tier stuff that most people don't care about. That in itself lowers the standard of the board, the very standard that is often being cited as the reason for complaint in the first place.
This is a board with diverse opinions. It is not and will not be crafted to house only the opinions you deem worthy.
He was never that articulate.
This thread:
Cheer up you sad sacks. We actually WON on the weekend if you didn't notice
View attachment 1983266
In SmithJust wait for the selection thread to kick into gear tomorrow
He did a Tafe course on witty retorts
It was a free course
Protecting the cartel as always.Interesting comment coming from someone who has spent days agitating about the quality of posting and moderating on this board.
I'm sorry that you don't like it, but the mods are not the opinion police. Posts aren't going to be deleted because they are too negative or because you specifically don't like them.
This board has many negative opinions of the club because the club has not won a premiership in 25 years. That is the root of it. Not a moderation conspiracy.
It's also ironic that complaining about the standard of the board feeds into itself. Getting upset about someone else's opinion so you feel the need to call them out personally, rather than addressing the actual content they've posted, is trash tier stuff that most people don't care about. That in itself lowers the standard of the board, the very standard that is often being cited as the reason for complaint in the first place.
This is a board with diverse opinions. It is not and will not be crafted to house only the opinions you deem worthy.
Protecting the cartel as always.
This is why we, I mean they, pay the mods what they do.
Hmmmm maybe there is some truth to this Cartel business. Poor OccamsRazorRay is the only one suspended in this thread. Mutineer and Jeffcrowe have disappeared without a trace.
I am beginning to understand why Alex is on fire faked his own death.
First of all, me asking why they don’t do it every week is not sinking the boots in and no one answered why it’s not the case. I would have thought it if it was instructional and they saw benefit they would. Again asking the question, no sinking the boot in.
The last 2 quotes are not me sinking the boot in about what they’ve done, it’s stating that given their history of ******* up that we shouldn’t just blindly accept what they’ve done as being good. The last comment was in sinking the boots into your lot.
If you consider any of that sinking the boot in you’re pretty precious
I had this ready to go but didn’t post
True story
Murphy in....Just wait for the selection thread to kick into gear tomorrow