- Aug 11, 2008
- 8,962
- 12,263
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Yawn.
(Bet you'll rebut this point as well)
(Bet you'll rebut this point as well)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Heaven help all these Green Hippy ****tas if they were living in the lead up to the Ice Age. What happened back then, not enough humans on the Earth to stop Global Cooling?"It's the single biggest cause - burning coal - for climate change and it must take its major share of responsibility for the weather events we are seeing unfolding now...It is costing billions of dollars, besides the pain, the anguish, the loss of life, the destruction..."
australian coal miners should be tried for manslaughter
Heaven help all these Green Hippy ****tas if they were living in the lead up to the Ice Age. What happened back then, not enough humans on the Earth to stop Global Cooling?
If the Greens are so keen on "reducing climate change" I suggest they all pool funds, buy a few fair Nuclear Bombs / missiles, completely destroy China and India, wipe 2B+ population from the Earth and reduce "our carbon footprint" as the pansies would say.
.
If the Greens are so keen on "reducing climate change" I suggest they all pool funds, buy a few fair Nuclear Bombs / missiles, completely destroy China and India, wipe 2B+ population from the Earth and reduce "our carbon footprint" as the pansies would say.
Poor use of resources. If you are going to Nuke people to reduce global warming, you need to aim at the West. Starting with Australia. Take out Melbourne, Sydney and Perth with a nuke each, and the rest would collapse. A dozen or so to the US, and another dozen or more to Europe. 30 nukes targetted at the biggest emmiters per capita would solve the problem.
Per capita is very important if you only have a limited number of nukes.Another great myth perpetuated.
The environmental issue is the amount getting into the atmosphere and as such it should be addressed on a parts per million basis.
All the per capita rubbish is not addressing pollution.
If the developed world halves their per capita while China and India double theirs, China and India will still be less on a per capita but the world will still have increased amounts in the atmosphere.
The most bang for your buck so to speak is where it would eliminate the most and that puts China at the top of the list.Per capita is very important if you only have a limited number of nukes.
Youve got to get the most bang for your buck.
I realise you are not serious, but China would just take it as a sign of their superiority.If, If, If.
If the west got nuked because of Co2 levels, China and India would be spooked.