Greens blame Coal miners for Qld floods

Remove this Banner Ad

"It's the single biggest cause - burning coal - for climate change and it must take its major share of responsibility for the weather events we are seeing unfolding now...It is costing billions of dollars, besides the pain, the anguish, the loss of life, the destruction..."

australian coal miners should be tried for manslaughter :D
Heaven help all these Green Hippy ****tas if they were living in the lead up to the Ice Age. What happened back then, not enough humans on the Earth to stop Global Cooling?

If the Greens are so keen on "reducing climate change" I suggest they all pool funds, buy a few fair Nuclear Bombs / missiles, completely destroy China and India, wipe 2B+ population from the Earth and reduce "our carbon footprint" as the pansies would say.

Before the Green Poo Shooters reply, shut your computer down, turn off your electricity, dispose of the car, sell the house and live in the tree tops with the monkeys. Thats a sure fire way you can help our Planet by "reducing our Carbon Footprint" and avoid the monster that is, "Climate Change".
 
Heaven help all these Green Hippy ****tas if they were living in the lead up to the Ice Age. What happened back then, not enough humans on the Earth to stop Global Cooling?

If the Greens are so keen on "reducing climate change" I suggest they all pool funds, buy a few fair Nuclear Bombs / missiles, completely destroy China and India, wipe 2B+ population from the Earth and reduce "our carbon footprint" as the pansies would say.

.

Poor use of resources. If you are going to Nuke people to reduce global warming, you need to aim at the West. Starting with Australia. Take out Melbourne, Sydney and Perth with a nuke each, and the rest would collapse. A dozen or so to the US, and another dozen or more to Europe. 30 nukes targetted at the biggest emmiters per capita would solve the problem.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Poor use of resources. If you are going to Nuke people to reduce global warming, you need to aim at the West. Starting with Australia. Take out Melbourne, Sydney and Perth with a nuke each, and the rest would collapse. A dozen or so to the US, and another dozen or more to Europe. 30 nukes targetted at the biggest emmiters per capita would solve the problem.

Another great myth perpetuated.

The environmental issue is the amount getting into the atmosphere and as such it should be addressed on a parts per million basis.

All the per capita rubbish is not addressing pollution.

If the developed world halves their per capita while China and India double theirs, China and India will still be less on a per capita but the world will still have increased amounts in the atmosphere.
 
Another great myth perpetuated.

The environmental issue is the amount getting into the atmosphere and as such it should be addressed on a parts per million basis.

All the per capita rubbish is not addressing pollution.
Per capita is very important if you only have a limited number of nukes.
Youve got to get the most bang for your buck.

If the developed world halves their per capita while China and India double theirs, China and India will still be less on a per capita but the world will still have increased amounts in the atmosphere.

If, If, If.

If the west got nuked because of Co2 levels, China and India would be spooked.
:D
 
Per capita is very important if you only have a limited number of nukes.
Youve got to get the most bang for your buck.
The most bang for your buck so to speak is where it would eliminate the most and that puts China at the top of the list.

Probably wouln't hurt to take out North Korea accidentally in the pursuit of world peace:rolleyes:


If, If, If.

If the west got nuked because of Co2 levels, China and India would be spooked.
:D
I realise you are not serious, but China would just take it as a sign of their superiority.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Greens blame Coal miners for Qld floods

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top