sr36
TheBrownDog
If Grundy becomes a decent forward, we can do what we do with all decent forwards - talk about moving them into the midfield. For once it will actually be a really good idea.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Grundy has never shown any forward craft, just because he is the best ruck in the league doesn't mean you can just play him CHF and expect him to do any good, his marking isn't great and either is his set shot kicking, he signed a 7 year deal to be a ruckman, so just let him ruckWes Fellowes played forward from time to time, as did Monkey.
Let’s not forget Josh Fraser, the guy whose career was cut short by playing in the ruck for ten plus years.
Finally he burnt out, and the club moved on to Jolly. Why would anyone want a repeat of that?
Whilst I don’t disagree with your comment re lack of burst speed, I am staggered by your assertion that he doesn’t have repeat effort endurance.Supremely agile for a ruckman but he's still a big lumbering beast with no burst of speed on take off and not enough agility to use trickery to gain separation on a defender.
I've also got some doubts about his ability to keep presenting on repeat leads as well, as that sort of endurance (repeat efforts at something closer to top speed) is certainly not his strong suit.
Glad I didn’t suggest he should play back pocket! There’d probably be a witch hunt for me.
We were beaten badly at centre half forward in the prelim, Mihochek was completely ineffective. For the first time in his career he was heavily targeted as a danger player, and the result was that we lost.
Grundy on the other hand amassed close to record stats as a ruckman that day, but kept palming the ball to his feet, to no obvious advantage, I can’t remember one occasion where he punched it forward a few metres to gain some ground, and catch the Giants out.
If you look to the right there's a reply button.Maybe I am, but you sound like David King with all that jargon. I just notice when players are being beaten by their opponents.
...and will be our No 1 ruckman for some time, he's the best in the business, play to your strengths.He might play more Forward but he still be our Number 1 Ruck
Kelly might work out as an option.We won’t know unless it’s tried, presuming it will ever be tried.
The reality is however that the alternatives are Reid, Mihochek and Cox. None of these names fill me with great confidence. if we are going to be a serious contender, we need to address the obvious void at CHF.
Josh Fraser should have been CHF not the ruck we turned him into.Grundy doesn't have the flimsy frame of Josh Fraser. He's also a ruck and rover which is invaluable.
Technically correct but Grundy is the best footballer that plays in that position, he's not just a ruckman IMHOno way, he's the best ruck in the AFL
That goal against Richmond with 4 seconds to go showed some small forward craft....lolGrundy has never shown any forward craft, just because he is the best ruck in the league doesn't mean you can just play him CHF and expect him to do any good, his marking isn't great and either is his set shot kicking, he signed a 7 year deal to be a ruckman, so just let him ruck
Thank you.If you look to the right there's a reply button.
Not obligated to use it, would be nice though so it doesn't look like you're talking to yourself
Grundy has never shown any forward craft, just because he is the best ruck in the league doesn't mean you can just play him CHF and expect him to do any good, his marking isn't great and either is his set shot kicking, he signed a 7 year deal to be a ruckman, so just let him ruck
That goal against Richmond with 4 seconds to go showed some small forward craft....lol
Obviously he can't play ruck for seven years, this is why Collingwood gave him a seven year contract...to confuse the opposition?Must be a full moon.
Maybe I am, but you sound like David King with all that jargon. I just notice when players are being beaten by their opponents.
Grundy rarely gets beaten by his opponent.
As for the rest of your comment my post has zero to do with David King or any similarities in the opinion of the Pies system. It merely explains forwards any forward can be curtailed by opposition pressure. That's the key to the Pies plan, outnumber in the contest AND outnumber when in possession or at least it was in 2018.
As for your idea, how do you think he'd go as a chf against the likes of McGovern, Davis, Tarrant etc. etc? these guys are all much much more mobile than Grundy. At best a resting deep forward and that's years away IMO.
Is that Phil Davis? He's less mobile than Ben Reid!
I'd have Phil Davis at Collingwood in a heartbeat!Is that Phil Davis? He's less mobile than Ben Reid!
I'd have Phil Davis at Collingwood in a heartbeat!