How far can North Melbourne go?

Remove this Banner Ad

Roos34

Team Captain
Dec 8, 2004
341
4
Perth
AFL Club
North Melbourne
The next 4 weeks consists of Adelaide away, Melbourne mcg, brisbane gabba & hawthorn ethiad.

More than likely win 3 out of 4.

Are North a genuine top 4 contender? Remote flag threat?
 
You're beginning with North will likely beat three teams who are all in the bottom eight and then asking if they are a flag threat.

North need to stop the poor performances they produce at times before finals.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

If they make the 8 which they should then yes they are a remote flag chance, like any one else in the 8.
They have already beaten top 4 teams, so yes, they are a chance for top 4, though fairly remote as the other top 4 contenders are either very good or good an easier fixture coming up
 
The next 4 weeks consists of Adelaide away, Melbourne mcg, brisbane gabba & hawthorn ethiad.

More than likely win 3 out of 4.

Are North a genuine top 4 contender? Remote flag threat?

Short answer is yes they could finish top 4 with this draw.
Long answer is no they aren't a flag threat.

Lacking 1 genuine strong tall at both ends. Lacking a genuine leader with the combination of hardness, consistency and footskill.

Goldstein showed an unusual level of intensity last night but is generally too timid. Gibson, greenwood, Anthony, swallow, all have VFL disposal.
Too reliant on Harvey, who is a champion but icing on the cake come pressure finals.

Wells the same.

Thomas hasn't a particular role and easily unsettles the whole group. The Thomas non specific role is going to burn the side when it matters, particularly as he's an overachiever in the Gibson mould. If the side can rid itself of the Thomas curse where he inspires the opposition and turns the umpires against the side, it will go a long way.

Simply not enough complete footballers to win a flag. Glaring weaknesses whether physical, mental or talent wise throughout. When they click they are great.
Big pressure football and they'll fold at the knees, much like their captain and leading goal scorer do many times a game.
 
Wouldn't be surprised to see them push for top 4 however can't see them getting to a grand final. Next year they are probably going to go all out for a flag seeing as Petrie is rapidly declining and Daw/Tarrant aren't any good.
 
They just aren't that good. Is their midfield better than that of any of Geelong, Hawthorn, Freo, Sydney, Collingwood or Port? What about their forward line or defence? I'm not sure they match up with any of those teams in any areas.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

They just aren't that good. Is their midfield better than that of any of Geelong, Hawthorn, Freo, Sydney, Collingwood or Port? What about their forward line or defence? I'm not sure they match up with any of those teams in any areas.

Yep, still 3 years away.

Yep too many overachievers, not enough soldiers. Scott wastes too much time protecting the mental fragility of his pets to achieve something as difficult as a flag. Problem is, in keeping the overachievers heads up, the talent isn't coming in. Need a new captain, get rid of Thomas, Gibson, wright, Daw.

The Petrie retirement will throw a spanner in the works. If he's going to play mr nice guy football, he may as well retire this year.

If Goldstein, bastinac can't deliver intensity regularly, might as well look to trade them.

Getting a franchise club key forward and harder ruckman should be a priority along with a reliable crumber to replace Thomas. A key backman is a pipe dream at north so may as well get used to dopey Hansen, injured Grima and short arse Thompson.
 
A half decent team would have put them away in the third quarter, they were lucky to be playing the competition basket case.

Their best is excellent, but nobody knows when that side will show up, or for how much of a game. Against the top teams in September, that won't cut it.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

How far can North Melbourne go?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top