Society/Culture Hypocrisy of The Left - part 3

Remove this Banner Ad

From this thread and the other, I'd say the majority aren't concerned at all about men's feelings.

This is a workable example of SDE.

Men are constantly being invited to conversations about mental health.

This whole episode is to defend a child trafficking pedophile. It’s transparently artificial.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Context is important.

Yelling "small dick" at a random - over the line
In response to a violent misogynist who has done far worse, publicly and privately - fair game.
The problem with that is that randoms are watching and getting the message that it's acceptable to use this as a pejorative and that it has something to do with your masculinity or worth as a person. This is particularly true when it's someone like Greta who I assume is a feminist. Whereas when Tate uses such language it can be viewed as part of a toxic mindset.

We're trying to move away from toxic masculinity and such names, whether it's big dick energy as a compliment, or small dick energy as an insult, reinforce it.

When I was younger I had a friend who was a solid guy, affectionately known as Fatman - would I call other people that? No. This guy wore it like a badge of honor (he was more powerlifter shaped than obese anyway).

Again, context.
Affectionate nicknames in a personal relationship are quite different from what's happening here.
 
We are always concerned about men's feelings.
We have barely begun to even acknowledge men's feelings, or get men to acknowledge their own, let alone be concerned about them.

The problem here is the context the issue is raised.

RWNJs always suddenly become concerned with an issue when it benefits their position
This is just tribalism rather than concentrating on whether the use of such names is appropriate.
 
Last edited:
This is a workable example of SDE.

Men are constantly being invited to conversations about mental health.

This whole episode is to defend a child trafficking pedophile. It’s transparently artificial.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Are you saying my post is an example of SDE?

'Men are constantly being invited to conversations about mental health.' Not on here they're not, certainly not in one of these two threads.

'This whole episode is to defend a child trafficking pedophile. It’s transparently artificial.' I'm going to assume you're referring to twitter or some other social media platform, coz there ain't no defending of peds in here.
 
Are you saying my post is an example of SDE?

'Men are constantly being invited to conversations about mental health.' Not on here they're not, certainly not in one of these two threads.

'This whole episode is to defend a child trafficking pedophile. It’s transparently artificial.' I'm going to assume you're referring to twitter or some other social media platform, coz there ain't no defending of peds in here.
Yes, generalised comments.

having said that, this thread is directly linked to defenders of Tate (some on here, plenty vomiting on social media) so the 2 can't be seperated.

The use of the term SDE has only been applied to men who are misogynist, excuse rape and trafficking and see women as objects to be groomed. All these men have small dick energy, and hopefully do feel shame and mental anguish about their attitudes.
 
I haven't aimed a these put downs I though of on the spot at any female in particular, just using them as example counterpoints to make the point that these 'clap backs' are indeed toxic regardless of the gender/sex being targeted.

Whether male or female, making derisive comments about a person's physical body should be out bounds no matter the political persuasion of the individual someone is disagreeing with; it's basic common sense and decency.

I'm fairly satisfied with the size of my appendage so any pathetic juvenile comments about it don't elicit any response from me, you can keep speculating about it if that's the kind of thing you're into.

It seems I was right though in that misandry disguised as put downs aimed at supposed 'evil' Right Wingers (without taking into consideration that there would be many young Leftwing males that would also be impacted by such puerile put downs) is deemed to be acceptable 'cos 'Right Wingers are evil' and everything goes when it comes to taking them down.

But similar comments directed at women are met with outrage and severely frowned upon. I shouldn't be surprised as hypocrisy is a fairly common trait among the radical left that pretends to be all inclusive but definitely favours certain demographics over others.
lol 'misandry'. Loud and clear, where you're coming from.

All of you MGTOW, MRA or whatever acronym is being used now, are nothing more than vermin. Insecure, misogynistic, rape culture enthusiasts.

Posters coming in here to complain about the term without acknowledging it's in reference to a hero of a rape culture advocate are transparent in their motivation.

Small dick energy dweebs.

I could point out the term is not a direct reference to bodies, but that's not what you're here for. Is it?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Thanks. Why energy?
NFI. Think it's got something to with spirit sometimes being a synonym for energy; they're filled with a strange kind of energy, something they possess that supposedly denotes a larger than average penis.

Kind of overlaps with the chad/alpha/sigma bullshit if you ask me.
 
This inclination towards privacy doesn't appear to get taken into account when men are concerned. Even had an AFL players (Ricky Henderson) junk captured by dressing room camera while Basil Zempilas made dick jokes. That's just one incident but it shows the mentality when a TV network actually thought this could go to air.
Yeah you would never hear tiny T**ty jokes when discussing AFLW players.
 
It's OK to have a small dick or even no dick.
Yeah it is.

But if you're going to be a misogynist or who mouths Tate like stuff or excuses child trafficking and rape, you're going to cop it good and proper.

Just a reminder, plenty of posters are more concerned about the insult, than the crimes.

It is a working definition of small dick energy from some small dicked little pissants.
 
You just made one.
No he didn't.
Yeah it is.

But if you're going to be a misogynist or who mouths Tate like stuff or excuses child trafficking and rape, you're going to cop it good and proper.
Malifice didn't even mention Tate, he mentioned defending men plural with small dicks, and inferring conservatives have small dicks as well.

Just a reminder, plenty of posters are more concerned about the insult, than the crimes.
The crimes are up to the police so there's not really much to talk about. I guess you could talk about how fake this alpha stuff is.
 
No he didn't.

The crimes are up to the police so there's not really much to talk about.
Like a lot of small dick energy weasels, he made a joke under the guise of equivocation.

No, there's plenty to talk about. Pointing out the deceptive, weak way you types insert a non-issue into something meaningful. That can be talked about all day.
 
Like a lot of small dick energy weasels, he made a joke under the guise of equivocation.
He referenced what the equivalent would be to commentators making jokes about an AFL players junk, which IS what happened.

No, there's plenty to talk about. Pointing out the deceptive, weak way you types insert a non-issue into something meaningful. That can be talked about all day.
So what you want to talk about is effectively your own blind assumptions.
That's not a conversation.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Society/Culture Hypocrisy of The Left - part 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top