Society/Culture Hypocrisy of The Left - part 3

[Lethality]

But, the poster just made a joke.

I think you misread it?

He mentioned what an unacceptable equivalent would be.

 

[Carringbush2010]

Yes, generalised comments.

having said that, this thread is directly linked to defenders of Tate (some on here, plenty vomiting on social media) so the 2 can't be seperated.

The use of the term SDE has only been applied to men who are misogynist, excuse rape and trafficking and see women as objects to be groomed. All these men have small dick energy, and hopefully do feel shame and mental anguish about their attitudes.

'From this thread and the other, I'd say the majority aren't concerned at all about men's feelings.'

I don't know how you correlate this with small dick energy.

As for this 'having said that, this thread is directly linked to defenders of Tate (some on here, plenty vomiting on social media) so the 2 can't be seperated.'

I've seen one poster defend him, no one else. Unless you can link other posters defending him?

As for this 'The use of the term SDE has only been applied to men who are misogynist, excuse rape and trafficking and see women as objects to be groomed. All these men have small dick energy, and hopefully do feel shame and mental anguish about their attitudes.'

And? Are you attempting to educate me on what SDE is? (not required BTW) If you're suggesting that misogynists have SDE and should feel shame (I'd probably go a lot further than wish anguish on such people) I'd tell you I don't think you'll find much opposition to your sentiment.

 

[Gethelred]

'From this thread and the other, I'd say the majority aren't concerned at all about men's feelings.'

I don't know how you correlate this with small dick energy.

As for this 'having said that, this thread is directly linked to defenders of Tate (some on here, plenty vomiting on social media) so the 2 can't be seperated.'

I've seen one poster defend him, no one else. Unless you can link other posters defending him?

As for this 'The use of the term SDE has only been applied to men who are misogynist, excuse rape and trafficking and see women as objects to be groomed. All these men have small dick energy, and hopefully do feel shame and mental anguish about their attitudes.'

And? Are you attempting to educate me on what SDE is? (not required BTW) If you're suggesting that misogynists have SDE and should feel shame (I'd probably go a lot further than wish anguish on such people) I'd tell you I don't think you'll find much opposition to your sentiment.

Where you'd differ is what constitutes misogyny, seeing as you're a negative liberty good/positive liberty bad sort of a fellow.

 

[Gralin]

The facts don't care about your feelings crowd have really picked this to have feelings on.

I'm shocked, it couldn't possibly have anything to do with one of their own getting a big public L could it

 

[Lethality]

The facts don't care about your feelings crowd have really picked this to have feelings on.

Such terms can be detrimental to everybody.

 

[JyeDye]

Forget toxic masculinity, this is all coming across as fragile masculinity. A violent misogynist gets his comeuppance from a teenaged girl and the upshot of it all is we're worried about men's feelings.

Isn't that the whole point? Insults like this make people insecure and fragile about body characteristics that they can't change.

 

[JyeDye]

There's a conversation to be had around this, even if a number of those suddenly terribly concerned about positive body image seem to have done so in order to criticize Greta Thunberg. I also think there's a fair chance this thread will go the same way the other one did.

I don't think the SRP is mature enough to have a respectful conversation about this. We'll see.

This is how I feel. Majority of people are bringing it up with other true agendas, and others are dismissing it because of who it was directed at. Although the conversation spawned more so because of faux outrage, it doesn't mean that it should be immediately dismissed, at least that's how I feel.

I had a quick look online to see what perspectives were on this kind of insult before the Tate/Greta stuff just to see a more unbiased point of view, worth a read before a bunch of mud started getting slung:



Honestly I struggle to see how it's a beneficial term whatsoever and believe people saying it's okay are using some pretty backwards logic because it's typically used against people who deserve to be insulted anyways, that doesn't mean it's okay. I think there is a conversation to be had here, but unfortunately right now is not the time or place for it.

 

[perthblue]

Yes it is body shaming, yes it is sexist. Nobody will care because it’s about men.

 

[Taylor]

I think use of the phrase both in the good and bad is very low brow/low intelligence.

But I don't think it's body shaming. It's not actually referring to the body of the man it's being directed at, it's the way they carry themselves.

The essence of a man isn't his penis.

We all know it's the balls and their firmness extending all the way to steel or brass.

Humanity has had an obsession with sex, I don't think there is any thing or any part else that has so much slang in just english as the equipment in your undies.

 

[Cap]

We have barely begun to even acknowledge men's feelings, or get men to acknowledge their own, let alone be concerned about them.


This is just tribalism rather than concentrating on whether the use of such names is appropriate.

Lol.

You mean suddenly being concerned about small penises because your favourite Bro outed himself trying to own a teenage girl?

men's mental health is something most normal men are engaged with...some male communities have other focuses.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

This thread wouldn’t exist but for a child rapist snd sex trafficker being exposed.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Ghost Patrol]

These SDE clowns have spent years demonizing the left as the cause of all their problems, but now they want our sympathy?

 

[Lethality]

Lol.

You mean suddenly being concerned about small penises because your favourite Bro outed himself trying to own a teenage girl?

I don't follow or care about Tate. This is about the use of the term in general.

Men's mental health is something most normal men are engaged w

Addressing men's mental health includes tackling problematic terms, body shaming, toxic masculinity etc

 

[Lethality]

This thread wouldn’t exist but for a child rapist snd sex trafficker being exposed.

So? It's still a valid conversation

 

[Lethality]

These SDE clowns have spent years demonizing the left as the cause of all their problems, but now they want our sympathy?

The "SDE clowns" also use the term. I suspect they're just calling the left out on their hypocrisy in this case.

The sympathy is for people who are affected by the term as it reinforces toxicity, stereotypes, and body dysphoria

 

[Gralin]

The "SDE clowns" also use the term. I suspect they're just calling the left out on their hypocrisy in this case.

The sympathy is for people who are affected by the term as it reinforces toxicity, stereotypes, and body dysphoria

And yet you've not shown a single drop of sympathy for the victims of the guy the term was used against.

Interesting

 

[Lethality]

And yet you've not shown a single drop of sympathy for the victims of the guy the term was used against.

Interesting

The term is used against everyone. As the OP has stated this is not about Tate.

 

[Gralin]

The term is used against everyone. As the OP has stated this is not about Tate.

 

[Gralin]

You just spent pages in the Tate thread telling us the same thing, that it's not about Tate.
Every single time you've been given an opportunity to denounce what he's said and done or show any, and I do mean any empathy for his victims you've just gone right back your MRA bullshit.
You want to talk hypocrisy, you don't give a shit about this situation beyond your ability to use it to portray men as victims ahead of everyone else

 

[Lethality]

Every single time you've been given an opportunity to denounce what he's said and done

I think it goes without saying that rape and human trafficking is bad. Do you really need me to denounce it?

You want to talk hypocrisy, you don't give a s**t about this situation beyond your ability to use it to portray men as victims ahead of everyone else

I'm not portraying them as the primary victims, I just think the word is toxic and I'm disappointed that the left use it.

 

[Lethality]

...

This has nothing to do with Tate or Greta. I intentionally made a new thread without mentioning them to have a discussion on the merits of the term SDE without associating it to political slants. Don't derail the thread by trying to turn it back into a mudslinging match.

You're a mod, do better.

 

[Gralin]

I think it goes without saying that rape and human trafficking is bad. Do you really need me to denounce it?

Again, to you the bigger/only issue is clearly SDE and men as the victim

I'm not portraying them as the primary victims, I just think the word is toxic and I'm disappointed that the left use it.

They're the only thing you talk about. Men as victims is almost your entire personality on here

 

[Lethality]

Again, to you the bigger/only issue is clearly SDE and men as the victim

SDE is the political discussion that has emerged. I assume we're all on the same page when it comes to human trafficking.

They're the only thing you talk about. Men as victims is almost your entire personality on here

I also posted about how this affects women. I asked phantom13 if BDE is fair to women. So far he has dodged the question which is telling.

 

[Gralin]

SDE is the political discussion that has emerged. I assume we're all on the same page when it comes to human trafficking.

How would anyone know?

I also posted about how this affects women. I asked phantom13 if BDE is fair to women. So far he has dodged the question which is telling.

Yes and I posted an article from a woman talking about BDE and how women and non binary people can have it and how it's got nothing to do with genitals and you just said the article was too old to be relevant because you didn't like that it didn't agree with you

 

[Carringbush2010]

Where you'd differ is what constitutes misogyny, seeing as you're a negative liberty good/positive liberty bad sort of a fellow.

This is what constitutes misogyny according to a google search, which I'd agree with.



Not sure how you've come to the conclusion ' seeing as you're a negative liberty good/positive liberty bad sort of a fellow.'

I'm a staunch supporter of liberalism, so I'll disagree with your assessment of me.