Society/Culture Hypocrisy of The Left - part 3

[Barry_Badrinath]

This is Part 3 of this thread.

We roll threads over about every 10,000 posts.

Started in Part 1: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/hypocrisy-of-the-left.1079388/

Continued from Part 2: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/hypocrisy-of-the-left-part-2.1141142/

Continued in Part 4

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/hypocrisy-of-the-left-part-4.1389268/

 

[Noidenous]

You’re right it isn’t a race, yet you condone the religion so heavily that you oppress the majority of those believers, who happen to be middle eastern. In this case anyway.

You’re a dog mate

There's no Islamic presence in Asia? Not even far South East Asia?

Keep spinning your bullshit narrative, fool.

 

[Mofra]

United Nations action.

Incorrect.
The US and ECC recognised Bosnia and Herzegovina as the war broke out in 1992, but the was no unilateral UN resolution.

The peace agreement was signed by the 'Contact group' which was primarily the NATO powers + Russia.

 

[TimmeT]

Yugoslavia?

wasnt there a genocide of muslim bosnians？

 

[Len Nicodemo]

There's no Islamic presence in Asia? Not even far South East Asia?

Keep spinning your bullshit narrative, fool.

? Your point? All I know is I am talking to a person who is ok with abusing women because of their religion and you call it FREE SPEECH.

Oh, dig us up another GIF mate.

 

[Royal Flush]

Incorrect.
The US and ECC recognised Bosnia and Herzegovina as the war broke out in 1992, but the was no unilateral UN resolution.

The peace agreement was signed by the 'Contact group' which was primarily the NATO powers + Russia.

1999 support of NATO to bomb Serbia

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

 

[Bradesmaen]

wasnt there a genocide of muslim bosnians？

Sure, as well as other ethnic groups, however it wasn't based on Muslims was it now? I mean really, I'd expect people to have a knowledge of important events in the 90s.

 

[Noidenous]

Incorrect.
The US and ECC recognised Bosnia and Herzegovina as the war broke out in 1992, but the was no unilateral UN resolution.

The peace agreement was signed by the 'Contact group' which was primarily the NATO powers + Russia.

UNPROFOR was a peacekeeping taskforce, not an active conflict effort.

Considered 'warlike' due to the hostile nature of the surroundings.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Australia

 

[Noidenous]

? Your point? All I know is I am talking to a person who is ok with abusing women because of their religion and you call it FREE SPEECH.

Oh, dig us up another GIF mate.

Hahahaha.

You don't know shit. You've painted some idiotic hypothetical, had someone stonewall it and now you're dancing the 'racist!' dance.

 

[Len Nicodemo]

UNPROFOR was a peacekeeping taskforce, not an active conflict effort.

Considered 'warlike' due to the hostile nature of the surroundings.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Australia

Oh yeah peace keeping, that’s never been code for anything else....

 

[Len Nicodemo]

Hahahaha.

You don't know shit. You've painted some idiotic hypothetical, had someone stonewall it and now you're dancing the racist dance.

I didn’t paint a hypothetical

https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp...bused-on-melbourne-train-20190113-p50r56.html

 

[Noidenous]

I didn’t paint a hypothetical

https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp...bused-on-melbourne-train-20190113-p50r56.html

Ooh, I know how to answer this one Lefty style.

'Just because it happens once, doesn't means it happens to ALL Muslims'

 

[Noidenous]

Oh yeah peace keeping, that’s never been code for anything else....

So now you're a conspiracy theorist?

 

[Len Nicodemo]

Ooh, I know how to answer this one Lefty style.

'Just because it happens once, doesn't means it happens to ALL Muslims'

No, but you’re happy condoning it in the name of free speech right?

 

[Len Nicodemo]

So now you're a conspiracy theorist?

Realist

 

[TimmeT]

Sure, as well as other ethnic groups, however it wasn't based on Muslims was it now? I mean really, I'd expect people to have a knowledge of important events in the 90s.

the attack and ethnic cleansin of muslims was a major part of the war inbosnia

 

[Len Nicodemo]

Who does this country govern ? Australian citizens ,what are you suggesting people who live in Canada or Mexico are governed by the Australian constitution ?

The Constitution states that the Commonwealth "shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth" (section 116).

Which part of the constitution would be violated ? the US supreme court has said it is legal in the US so it would most likely be the same in Australia.

The only part you could claim is violated would be prohibiting free exercise of religion but that's not happening at all, no Muslim is being prevented from exercising their religious belief.

Ah yes I believe they are. I’d suggest you look up the protests against building places of religious belief, I.e mosques

 

[Mofra]

UNPROFOR was a peacekeeping taskforce, not an active conflict effort.

Considered 'warlike' due to the hostile nature of the surroundings.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Australia

Semantics.
The boots on the ground got the same allowances.

 

[Royal Flush]

the attack and ethnic cleansin of muslims was a major part of the war inbosnia

That was the American narrative
There is another truth.
All ethnic cleansing occured by all sides in the civil war.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

 

[Len Nicodemo]

How much further?

It's sort of strange when left wingers side with the employer against the employee. Would you feel the same if Walmart sacked a woman for having an abortion?

If Walmart sacked a woman for that reason it’s discrimination. This isn’t about employer v employee rights. He isn’t siding with one party because of that, he is making a stand on discrimination irrespective of whether it’s carried out by an employee or employer.

 

[Noidenous]

Semantics.
The boots on the ground got the same allowances.

Not semantics at all, no matter how much you want it to fit your narrative.

Going back to the original point, do you think Muslims will consider attacking through covert means for the Bosnian affair?

No, they won't.

Do you think they might just have an axe to grind over the constant WAR operations?

'Yeah, sure, we let people in from countries we're at war with all the time. It makes complete logistic, operational and political sense to do so.'

 

[Noidenous]

No, but you’re happy condoning it in the name of free speech right?

I couldn't give a winged proverbial, to be honest.

Show me something of note.

So much of a realist that you can't separate culture from race.

 

[Mofra]

Not semantics at all, no matter how much you want it to fit your narrative.

I don't have a narrative, I'm merely correcting you.

 

[Len Nicodemo]

I couldn't give a winged proverbial, to be honest.

Show me something of note.

So much of a realist that you can't separate culture from race.

Ok, for your simpleton mind, DO YOU CONDONE RACIAL / RELIGIOUS ABUSE OF THE WOMAN?

 

[Len Nicodemo]

Not semantics at all, no matter how much you want it to fit your narrative.

Going back to the original point, do you think Muslims will consider attacking through covert means for the Bosnian affair?

No, they won't.

Do you think they might just have an axe to grind over the constant WAR operations?

'Yeah, sure, we let people in from countries we're at war with all the time. It makes complete logistic, operational and political sense to do so.'

Do we let the militia in do we? Or refugees? Big difference.

 

[Noidenous]

I don't have a narrative, I'm merely correcting you.

Correcting incorrectly.

Consider yourself corrected.