News Insightful and Inciteful - 2022 Media Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Come home big fella.

AFL: Sydney Swans table four-year offer to forward prodigy Logan McDonald as he weighs up future​


Sydney is willing to give forward prodigy Logan McDonald a four-year extension as it plans for life after superstar Lance Franklin.

News Corp reported in February that McDonald was the sole top-six pick from the 2020 AFL draft yet to re-sign beyond his automatic two-year rookie contract.

Sydney’s bold bid to retain the West Australian even took McDonald’s agent, Ben Williams, of Players Ink, by surprise, as seen in Stan’s new documentary, Show Me The Money, released on March 10.

But McDonald, who kicked nine goals in seven games in his debut season, and Williams appear underwhelmed at the potential remuneration in an off-season discussion that includes McDonald’s father, Darren.

Williams described the proposal as “probably not what we were expecting”, which McDonald, 19, agreed with then followed up with: “I don’t think it’s a bad offer.”

“The Swans are very keen to extend Logan,” Williams said.

“It’s quite unusual to get a four-year offer as your first extension, but we believe we know where he’s going to get to and it’s my job to make sure that he’s locked in for the right price for that.

“It’s really good in the sense you’ve got some security should you take it, but you’ve got to figure out how much better you’re going to get, because you don’t necessarily want to be locked in for four years if you’re going to do this.

“Because if he signs a deal, then he outperforms that contract by a lot, that’s my worst nightmare.”

The Crows’ bid on Western Bulldogs Next Generation Academy prospect Jamarra Ugle-Hagan at No.1 in McDonald’s draft class before nabbing local product Thilthorpe.

But they did contemplate picking McDonald, with at least part of their decision to overlook him believed to be because there was some fear he would return to WA at some point.

“We’ll keep talking to the Swans and being a gun key forward they don’t come around too often they’re always in demand,” Williams said.

“The two clubs in WA need that sort of player as well, so Logan will always have the option to go home should he choose to.”

Williams believes McDonald is in “a great spot”, given Franklin just turned 35 and is entering the final season of his nine-year megadeal.

But a fascinating conversation followed between player and agent, starting with Williams asking the No.4 draft pick how many games he expected to play in 2022.

McDonald: “Hopefully 20, but I think my position in the team’s a tricky one because I don’t ruck and ‘Bud’ (Franklin)’s there.”

Williams: “No, you’re in a good position there, Loges. You’re happy there?”

McDonald: “Yeah, I’m happy. Very happy.”

Williams: “We’re planning on you being the No.1 (forward) but does that happen next year or does it happen the year after?”
 

Log in to remove this ad.

From The Age


AFL funding ladder revealed: $100m gap between top and bottom clubs​


Geelong, Collingwood, Hawthorn and West Coast each received at least $100 million less than both expansion teams Greater Western Sydney and Gold Coast and more than $50 million less than St Kilda in AFL funding over the past decade.
In a funding table that reveals remarkable and growing differences in allocations to clubs, the Saints were clearly the most subsidised of the Victorian clubs, obtaining close to $17 million more than the next Melbourne club, the Western Bulldogs, in variable funding over the decade to 2021. The Saints have a large debt of $9.5 million, behind only the Brisbane Lions, but did reduce their debt by $4.26 million last year.

Approximate 10-year totals (2012-21)​

Including 2021 estimates.
Table with 2 columns and 18 rows. Currently displaying rows 1 to 18.
GWS$203,000,000
Gold Coast$198,000,000
Bris Lions$160,000,000
St Kilda$156,000,000
Western Bulldogs$139,000,000
North Melbourne$134,000,000
Melbourne$132,000,000
Port Adelaide$122,000,000
Sydney$117,000,000
Richmond$106,000,000
Carlton$105,000,000
Essendon$100,000,000
Adelaide$99,700,000
Fremantle$99,000,000
Hawthorn$96,500,000
Geelong$95,800,000
West Coast$93,500,000
Collingwood$93,300,000

Operating Profit (excluding variable funding)​

Figures are 2017-2020 aggregates

Table with 2 columns and 18 rows. Currently displaying rows 1 to 18. Sorted descending by column "X.2"

Team Amount ▼
West Coast$32,189,339
Richmond$11,721,615
Hawthorn$11,433,381
Collingwood$11,216,330
Essendon$4,849,837
Adelaide$3,182,438
Geelong$2,971,862
Carlton$48,995
Fremantle−$897,112
Gold Coast−$4,525,763
Western Bulldogs−$7,896,547
Sydney−$11,586,960
Port Adelaide−$14,560,551
North Melbourne−$15,718,784
Melbourne−$19,112,672
St Kilda−$32,660,014
Bris Lions−$35,227,747
GWS−$50,015,600
 
From The Age


AFL funding ladder revealed: $100m gap between top and bottom clubs​


Geelong, Collingwood, Hawthorn and West Coast each received at least $100 million less than both expansion teams Greater Western Sydney and Gold Coast and more than $50 million less than St Kilda in AFL funding over the past decade.
In a funding table that reveals remarkable and growing differences in allocations to clubs, the Saints were clearly the most subsidised of the Victorian clubs, obtaining close to $17 million more than the next Melbourne club, the Western Bulldogs, in variable funding over the decade to 2021. The Saints have a large debt of $9.5 million, behind only the Brisbane Lions, but did reduce their debt by $4.26 million last year.

Approximate 10-year totals (2012-21)​

Including 2021 estimates.
Table with 2 columns and 18 rows. Currently displaying rows 1 to 18.
GWS$203,000,000
Gold Coast$198,000,000
Bris Lions$160,000,000
St Kilda$156,000,000
Western Bulldogs$139,000,000
North Melbourne$134,000,000
Melbourne$132,000,000
Port Adelaide$122,000,000
Sydney$117,000,000
Richmond$106,000,000
Carlton$105,000,000
Essendon$100,000,000
Adelaide$99,700,000
Fremantle$99,000,000
Hawthorn$96,500,000
Geelong$95,800,000
West Coast$93,500,000
Collingwood$93,300,000

Operating Profit (excluding variable funding)​

Figures are 2017-2020 aggregates

Table with 2 columns and 18 rows. Currently displaying rows 1 to 18. Sorted descending by column "X.2"

Team Amount ▼
West Coast$32,189,339
Richmond$11,721,615
Hawthorn$11,433,381
Collingwood$11,216,330
Essendon$4,849,837
Adelaide$3,182,438
Geelong$2,971,862
Carlton$48,995
Fremantle−$897,112
Gold Coast−$4,525,763
Western Bulldogs−$7,896,547
Sydney−$11,586,960
Port Adelaide−$14,560,551
North Melbourne−$15,718,784
Melbourne−$19,112,672
St Kilda−$32,660,014
Bris Lions−$35,227,747
GWS−$50,015,600
Pretty concerning that less than half the clubs turn a profit.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Incoming Nisbett email: "We don't have as much money as reported - please pass around the hat again, our grandchildren need more caviar."
1281379.jpg
 
Personally would much rather go back to a 16 team comp.

i think 14 is the sweet spot in terms of talent and even long term viability of the comp/quality.

Effectively remove the bottom 10 players from each club

Will never happen as nobody in the media is willing to bring it up as undoubtedly it'd have to be at least 2 Vic clubs that fold
 
From The Age


AFL funding ladder revealed: $100m gap between top and bottom clubs​


Geelong, Collingwood, Hawthorn and West Coast each received at least $100 million less than both expansion teams Greater Western Sydney and Gold Coast and more than $50 million less than St Kilda in AFL funding over the past decade.
In a funding table that reveals remarkable and growing differences in allocations to clubs, the Saints were clearly the most subsidised of the Victorian clubs, obtaining close to $17 million more than the next Melbourne club, the Western Bulldogs, in variable funding over the decade to 2021. The Saints have a large debt of $9.5 million, behind only the Brisbane Lions, but did reduce their debt by $4.26 million last year.

Approximate 10-year totals (2012-21)​

Including 2021 estimates.
Table with 2 columns and 18 rows. Currently displaying rows 1 to 18.
GWS$203,000,000
Gold Coast$198,000,000
Bris Lions$160,000,000
St Kilda$156,000,000
Western Bulldogs$139,000,000
North Melbourne$134,000,000
Melbourne$132,000,000
Port Adelaide$122,000,000
Sydney$117,000,000
Richmond$106,000,000
Carlton$105,000,000
Essendon$100,000,000
Adelaide$99,700,000
Fremantle$99,000,000
Hawthorn$96,500,000
Geelong$95,800,000
West Coast$93,500,000
Collingwood$93,300,000

Operating Profit (excluding variable funding)​

Figures are 2017-2020 aggregates

Table with 2 columns and 18 rows. Currently displaying rows 1 to 18. Sorted descending by column "X.2"

Team Amount ▼
West Coast$32,189,339
Richmond$11,721,615
Hawthorn$11,433,381
Collingwood$11,216,330
Essendon$4,849,837
Adelaide$3,182,438
Geelong$2,971,862
Carlton$48,995
Fremantle−$897,112
Gold Coast−$4,525,763
Western Bulldogs−$7,896,547
Sydney−$11,586,960
Port Adelaide−$14,560,551
North Melbourne−$15,718,784
Melbourne−$19,112,672
St Kilda−$32,660,014
Bris Lions−$35,227,747
GWS−$50,015,600
Lol at all those Norf and Bulldog fans that try and say their clubs are solvent. They always argue that they deserve more revenue because they don't get as many marquee or prime time slots. Last time I looked, neither do many of the non-Vic clubs. West Coast seems to play a shitload of late Sunday games.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top