- Apr 2, 2013
- 11,698
- 17,804
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Don't really see the point. As long as the salary cap investigator does their job without fear or favour otherwise it is just ideal curiosity.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
If it makes you feel any better footy players earn only a fraction of what pro athletes in the States and Europe make in a season.It would only depress me more to know that player who spent all evening dropping marks and kicking to opposition players was earning more in a year than a heart surgeon.
Lol!! What about Natanui?? getting more than that and Wellingham has shown moreWhy I am for the disclosure of contracts is it holds football departments accountable. If West Coast are paying Wellingham 500k then someone needs to be shot... and it's not Wellingham's fault.
I really see no benefit.
Listing salaries won't stop salary cap cheating - teams just won't list that part.
The players don't negotiate, their managers do and they know full well the market rates.Publishing salaries helps the players negotiate - "If that guy makes $700,000, I should too - I am as good as him". It is fun for the fans but, really, it is a tool used by the players union.
Really, if you found that the guy who sits beside you and does the same job at work was making 20k more per year, would you not negotiate a pay increase? That is why employers want salaries to be secret.
Simply, it's none of their business.Ive never understood the hoorah in Australia about what people earn. Alot of people lie about it, like people I've known forever have lied right to my face about it or stood me down like I'm asking about some super private shit.
Look at this thread. The vast majority want to know salary so they can judge the player on their worth. Why on Earth would anyone want to open themselves to that possible judgement when it's completely unnecessary. I'm not talking just footy players here. I have no interest sharing my income for that very reason. There's nothing to be gained from it so what's the point?Telling people where you work is not the other person's business either - are people as uptight about that too?
Look at this thread. The vast majority want to know salary so they can judge the player on their worth. Why on Earth would anyone want to open themselves to that possible judgement when it's completely unnecessary. I'm not talking just footy players here. I have no interest sharing my income for that very reason. There's nothing to be gained from it so what's the point?
Practically all salaries are driven by the consumer. The AFL is not unique.The player's salaries come are funded by sponsors, tv rights deals , memberships etc. all of which are driven by the consumers which is us the fans.
The afl is unique in the fact that it's consumer is the vast majority of the australian public and is watched by millions of people every week.Practically all salaries are driven by the consumer. The AFL is not unique.
That is irrelevant.The afl is unique in the fact that it's consumer is the vast majority of the australian public and is watched by millions of people every week.
So you would have no interest at all at what salaries the eagles were paying?That is irrelevant.
Sure, but that doesn't justify them being forced to reveal their salary (whether it be anonymous or not).So you would have no interest at all at what salaries the eagles were paying?
No it doesn't. Contracts are complicated. Even if your idea was reality, we wouldn't receive the specifics. Furthermore, the most it could do is hold the AFL accountable but I don't see any evidence whatsoever that the AFL have been lenient on transgressions.Greater transperacy would only help deter cap cheating or discrepancies
West Coast members have no voting rights. Their membership is essentially a season pass. So I don't see how they could have any justifiable reasons whatsoever to demand specifics on salary.An argument can be made that members should know what the board are approving to pay players in the evaluation of their job success
ie if Carlton were paying Curnow 800k a year, the members would want some serious answers
The same can be said if they continue to pay Judd 800k+, the members may not be happy with that and could view it as fairly corrupt
As it currently stands, we dont really know what the club is doing with its salary cap and if its doing an effective job
Would be hilarious to see how much some of the spuds are on.I really see no benefit.
Listing salaries won't stop salary cap cheating - teams just won't list that part.