Play Nice Is it time to replace Woodside as sponsor?

Is it time to replace Woodside as sponsor?

  • Yes

    Votes: 29 18.2%
  • No

    Votes: 130 81.8%

  • Total voters
    159

Remove this Banner Ad

It shows how hard it is to effect change from an individual perspective and how hooked in we are to fossil fuels.

Change is necessary (inevitable really), urgent and needs to happen at a corporate and government level. Individual level is not going to come close to being adequate

Woodside is one of Australia's biggest greenhouse gas emitters. They also promote (either directly or indirectly) misinformation aimed at disrupting genuine efforts to deal with climate change (which they've made billions from) effectively.

Sending a message to them ain't a bad thing.

They'll go on existing and thriving for a while yet...with fingers well and truly inserted into the political system. It's weighted in their favour.
What misinformation do Woodside promote?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

From yesterday:


Fremantle President Dale Alcock has responded to an open letter sent to the club on Wednesday regarding the club’s Woodside partnership.

“I, on behalf of Fremantle Football Club, acknowledge that climate change and sustainability are key social issues,” Alcock told Radio 6PR.

“The issue is complex – it’s an important one – but it’s complex.

“The duty of our Board is to listen, to maintain balance, give things due consideration, not be reactive and then make the best decisions for our club.

“That’s the important role we’ve got to play here.

“We are respectful of the point of view of others – not just on this subject - but there’s a lot of issues that are impacting sport.”

Woodside joined Fremantle as a major sponsor in 2010 and the current partnership extends to the end of 2023.

“There’s obligations to abide by that contract and that’s what we’ll be doing,” Alcock said.

“With any contract, both parties will sit down and review it as it advances towards its conclusion.”

Alcock says Woodside is invested in many of Fremantle’s community programs and continues to work closely with Board and management on the club’s Reconciliation Action Plan.

“We can go straight to logos on jumpers, but there’s community programs that are deeply embedded in the WA community and the progress of our RAP plan at Fremantle we’ve worked on with Woodside,” Alcock told 6PR.

“If you look at community sport – all the way through to the elite level – you need corporate support, you need sponsorship.

“In Western Australia we don’t have too many (corporations) that are headquartered in Perth - and many of those that are in WA are resource related.

“Clearly half of our economy in Western Australia is resource related. It’s hard to avoid having relationships with resource companies and those resource companies are large employers – and large supporters – of our community.

“That is something we cannot disconnect from in Western Australia.”
Calling climate change a social issue is incorrect.
 
We should be asking for "Sponsor Free" jumper options (which all EPL clubs do). That way the club still gets the cash but you're not a walking billboard for these leaches.
Best and Less were selling them a few years back and maybe still do.
 
Go woke, go broke. Go get your 5th booster, how did all that crap work out for you? Conned. Just another scam the climate cult. Let's build heaps of desalination plants, it'll never rain again, wake up sheeple.
Carmen "I can't recall Lawrence" Haha. Go hide somewhere Carmen on your taxpayer funded bloated super,
I love fossil fuels.
 
This question is not going to go away. In fact, it's going to be asked more loudly, whether we like it or not.

The climate crisis is existential (let alone fricken expensive) and "approaching" a tipping point. Oil and gas companies are going to be more on the nose as time goes on. The heat, as it were, will only rise on the sponsorship.

Do it now or in 12 months' time, but Woodside won't be the sponsor in 202

This question is not going to go away. In fact, it's going to be asked more loudly, whether we like it or not.

The climate crisis is existential (let alone fricken expensive) and "approaching" a tipping point. Oil and gas companies are going to be more on the nose as time goes on. The heat, as it were, will only rise on the sponsorship.

Do it now or in 12 months' time, but Woodside won't be the sponsor in 2024.
Expensive? Haha, come back and talk about expensive in 5 years time when we're running on windmills.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

As soon as I heard the ungrateful woke brigade were trying this I emailed the club to hold off on deduting money for my 4 memberships.

Got an email back saying the club will continue the sponsorship as per the terms of the agreement so we're still members for 2023, yay!
View attachment 1540137

I mean, you do you, but threatening to leave the club over a sponsor change seems at least as looney to me as anything the original protestors are doing.
 
As soon as I heard the ungrateful woke brigade were trying this I emailed the club to hold off on deduting money for my 4 memberships.

Got an email back saying the club will continue the sponsorship as per the terms of the agreement so we're still members for 2023, yay!
View attachment 1540137
This reads like a cry for help. You ok?
 
Well they are only 7 million in debt..

Awkward Jay Z GIF by Complex
 
What misinformation do Woodside promote?
Their net zero targets are a farce. About 80% of carbon credits issued by Australia's clean energy regulator are flawed - they won't reduce the nation's carbon burden at all, and plenty will actually increase it.

On top of that their targets are only related to their operations and not the total scope of carbon emissions from the fossil fuels they produce (ie scope 3 emissions). They are also based on earlier estimations of their emissions that are likely to be less than half given the merger with BHP Petroleum.

I'm not anti-O&G but if companies are going to lie and mislead about their environmental impact then they need to be called out. Woodside has and will continue to leave a massive impact on our environment. I don't think people truly understand the scope of their impact. Pressuring to come clean and be more green shouldn't be disregarded through fear campaigns about job losses, weakened economy etc. t is possible to get a better balance and that starts with calling out their BS imo.
 
...Isn't lithium 100% recyclable though?

EDIT: Scratch that - it looks like Tesla lithium batteries internals are recyclable ...but with many current Li/ion battery recycling processes, the lithium itself either isn't recycled, or can't be easily recycled.

Lithium parts are recyclable. Nickel parts aren’t and Nickel processing and refining is just as bad as Lithium. And there’s lot more Nickel (or cobalt or manganese) in lithium batteries than actual lithium.
 
Isn’t that a win-win? Get the jumper you want and also boycott the clubs merchandise department?

Not really. I love the club and want them to prosper. I just, for very very personal reasons, don't want any merchandise with that corporation's name on it. I want the club to get the money.
 
Should be pretty easy for them to replace that $15,000,000 with a replacement that aligns with the players morals?

Those same morals include snorting

I guess they are fine with drug cartel operations, drug wars and family being ripped apart.

But not a sponsor who mines in Australia. The same country they live in that has wealth and prosperity.

**** their pseudo morals
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice Is it time to replace Woodside as sponsor?

Back
Top