- Jun 21, 2014
- 9,428
- 10,531
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
More pissed off the crows have not had a go at the AFL publicly .
Probably a bit too soon, but surely there is a case against the AFL for attempted draft tampering?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More pissed off the crows have not had a go at the AFL publicly .
Because reasons.I still don't understand why we weren't allowed to trade in Dunstan and get Brad Crouchs contract increased for pick 2.
And why the club didn't release it to the media as a question.Because reasons.
And why the club didn't release it to the media as a question.
Why not?
And why the club didn't release it to the media as a question.
Why not?
Eff them, I'm over the Vfl, lets do damage this draftAFL would probably find some infringement at a Vic club and then punish the Crows for it, like with Melbourne.
Just because I said soI still don't understand why we weren't allowed to trade in Dunstan and get Brad Crouchs contract increased for pick 2.
Eff them, I'm over the Vfl, lets do damage this draft
We should have been, there was a loop hole to exploit so it wasnt illegal however the Victorian clubs didnt like it and the AFL marched to the beat of their drumI still don't understand why we weren't allowed to trade in Dunstan and get Brad Crouchs contract increased for pick 2.
Last year when Greenwood bailed, Hamish said openly if he can get 4 years elsewhere good luck to him.There is an issue with this strategy, we’ve gone too far the other way.
If you are an opposition club targeting one of our players what will you offer? A long term deal. Then when it comes to the trade, they know we won’t match so we will buckle. We’ve got a number of free agents coming up so watch this space.
Then if we continue to lose players 26 upwards to this strategy, what’s our list balance going to look like?
Because we were not aware if it. They told St Kilda they couldn’t do the trade rather than telling us.And why the club didn't release it to the media as a question.
Why not?
I thought it was because St Kilda didn't want to up Crouch's base salary due to his past injury history?I still don't understand why we weren't allowed to trade in Dunstan and get Brad Crouchs contract increased for pick 2.
We should have been, there was a loop hole to exploit so it wasnt illegal however the Victorian clubs didnt like it and the AFL marched to the beat of their drum
On SM-G973F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Do we actually know this or are we speculating?
The length of time and lack of news on this front is starting to worry me. Would not be even mildly surprised to see either Sydney or Poort pick him up from under our nosesDo you expect Hately to come directly into the best 22 and play a pure midfield role?
Yes - probably not full time initiallyDo you expect Hately to come directly into the best 22 and play a pure midfield role?
I thought I had seen everything, but Fox Footy are even worse than the AFL site!
They say that we are interested in getting pick 14 from the Dogs (fair enough), but then suggest that the pick 14 might become part of the Hately trade!!??
Then, they go on and compound by suggesting that we might also bring Dunstan back from St Kilda, regardless of the failure of this Brouch side deal, because we are looking to repatriate ex-SA players !!?? Give me strength!
Scott Thompson was drafted pick 16 and we traded pick 12 to get him.
Thommo's 1st 4 seasons yielded 9, 5, 13 and 12 games.
Not only will Hately be bucket loads cheaper but he will play more than 13 games in his 1st season