Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 87,714
- 93,526
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
This year they did a fair bit.Did they play him on the wing like we did?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This year they did a fair bit.Did they play him on the wing like we did?
His kicking and ball handling are poor - but Berry does have genuine weapons (as Mutineer pointed out), which Hately never had.You actually make Berry sound half decent. No mention of the constant fumbling, which is a huge liability, especially in finals when the pressure is increased.
B- player at best.
If you can't survive at wing, you don't have any genuine business being an inside midfielder. The days of someone who can only play on the inside are slowly going the way of a pure tap ruckman or the stay at home key forward, especially seeing the ever growing need for lads that can transition from the contest and do damage.
If you're talking Sam Berry you're a mile of the mark, he hits the contest with serious intent, tackles like a demon, has decent burst speed, decent hops and top end endurance. His kicking has been ordinary but even that was showing some improvement. I can only imagine your recollection of Hately the Crow is a bit foggy?
Yes endurance, hops and acceleration.Endurance? Not so sure. Berry is a mile of being an AFL standard midfielder, slow hands, fumbles badly, no outside game, small in stature.
Yes endurance, hops and acceleration.
Victorian Draft Combine:
2km time trial: 6:10 minutes
Running vertical leap (R/L): 81/94
20m sprint: 3.02 seconds
10. Workhorse
Berry can run and run and run, proving his elite levels of endurance with a 21.7 in the Yo Yo test and finishing fifth in the 2km trial at the AFL Victoria Country combine.
Small in stature c'mon the guy is a bull.
Hately could play wing. Not amazingly but can get to the right spots and is good overhead.
I want Berry to succeed but his output for someone in year 4 and negative traits are really concerning.
I agree but those weapons are not enough to move us forward IMO. Way too limited.His kicking and ball handling are poor - but Berry does have genuine weapons (as Mutineer pointed out), which Hately never had.
I think his limitations will prevent him from becoming an A-grade player, but he's definitely an upgrade on Hately.I agree but those weapons are not enough to move us forward IMO. Way too limited.
Would have neitherI think his limitations will prevent him from becoming an A-grade player, but he's definitely an upgrade on Hately.
Berry is a mid-low grade AFL player. Hately is a good to very good SANFL/VFL footballer.
It's not as if we're spoiled for alternatives right now.Would have neither
Hately was a pretty good overhead mark who didn't mind going back with the flight and was hard to move off the ball, so could have been a decent half-back/winger, if he could have kicked 10 meters further (or lower).Hately could play wing. Not amazingly but can get to the right spots and is good overhead.